Developer Tools · head to head
Blacksmith vs Yarn

Blacksmith
Developer Tools
2x faster GitHub Actions with 60% cost savings
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Blacksmith per-minute pricing model requires estimating usage to predict costs; Yarn yarn 2+ (Berry) has limited ESM support which can be a constraint for some projects
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Blacksmith and Yarn actually diverge.
| Attribute | Blacksmith | Yarn |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Unknown | free |
| Platforms | GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS | Web, Linux, macOS, Windows |
| Founded | Unknown | 2016 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Developer Tools).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Blacksmith
- Bare metal runners
- Multiple OS support
- ARM support
- Docker layer caching
- Sticky disks
- GitHub Actions observability
- Free tier
- Static IPs
Only in Yarn
Nothing recorded that Blacksmith does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Blacksmith
- Replacing GitHub Actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructurenot Yarn
- Accelerating CI build times for organizations with heavy CI loadnot Yarn
- Reducing cloud spend on GitHub Actions by 60% or morenot Yarn
- Supporting ARM architecture builds without GitHub runnersnot Yarn
Yarn
- Monorepo teams managing dependencies across 50+ interdependent packagesnot Blacksmith
- Enterprise JavaScript projects ensuring reproducible builds across CI/CDnot Blacksmith
- Open-source projects with plugin ecosystems coordinating versionsnot Blacksmith
- Teams requiring consistent package installs regardless of network conditionsnot Blacksmith
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Blacksmith
- Per-minute pricing model requires estimating usage to predict costs
- macOS M4 pricing ($0.08/min) is significantly higher than GitHub Actions
- Docker layer caching and sticky disks are paid add-ons at $0.50/GB/mo
- Static IP add-on costs $100/IP/mo
Yarn
- Yarn 2+ (Berry) has limited ESM support which can be a constraint for some projects
- Smaller ecosystem and community compared to npm, though still substantial
Pricing, plan by plan
Blacksmith
Free- Ubuntu x64$0.004/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- Ubuntu ARM$0.0025/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- Windows x64$0.008/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- macOS M4$0.08/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
Yarn
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Yarn review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Blacksmith if
- You need bare metal runners.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS.
- You also want multiple os support.
Questions people ask
- Is Blacksmith or Yarn better?
- Neither clearly leads. Blacksmith starts at Free and Yarn at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Blacksmith or Yarn?
- Blacksmith starts at Free and Yarn at Free.
- Does Blacksmith or Yarn run on more platforms?
- Blacksmith runs on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS. Yarn runs on Web, Linux, macOS, Windows.
- Can I use Blacksmith for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Blacksmith best used for?
- Blacksmith is most often used for replacing github actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructure, accelerating ci build times for organizations with heavy ci load, reducing cloud spend on github actions by 60% or more, supporting arm architecture builds without github runners. Of those, replacing github actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructure and accelerating ci build times for organizations with heavy ci load are not what Yarn is typically brought in for.
- What can Blacksmith do that Yarn cannot?
- Blacksmith covers Bare metal runners, Multiple OS support, ARM support, Docker layer caching.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Blacksmith: How much do Blacksmith runners cost compared to GitHub Actions?
Blacksmith offers 60-75% cost savings depending on OS. Ubuntu x64 costs $0.004/min vs GitHub at $0.012/min. All plans include 3,000 free minutes monthly.
SourceYarn: What is Yarn's main advantage over npm?
Yarn downloads packages in parallel, significantly reducing installation time. It uses a yarn.lock file for deterministic installs, ensuring identical package versions across machines and preventing version conflicts common with npm.
SourceBlacksmith: Can I use Docker layer caching with Blacksmith?
Yes, Docker layer caching is available as an add-on at $0.50/GB/mo. Managed Docker layer persistence is included with the base service.
SourceYarn: Can I use Yarn in offline environments?
Yes, Yarn supports secure offline environments. The yarn.lock file enables reproducible installs without requiring new downloads.
SourceBlacksmith: What is the SLA for Enterprise plans?
Enterprise Blacksmith plans include a 99.9% SLA guarantee along with 24/7 priority support, dedicated Slack channels, white-glove onboarding, and CI optimization support.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Blacksmith vs WarpBuild
- Blacksmith vs Depot
- Blacksmith vs Namespace
- Blacksmith vs Earthly
- Blacksmith vs Nx Cloud
- Blacksmith vs OpsLevel
- Blacksmith vs Garden
- Blacksmith vs ConfigCat
- Blacksmith vs Dagger
- Blacksmith vs Nix
- Blacksmith vs Rust
- Blacksmith vs Ansible
- Blacksmith vs Refact
- Blacksmith vs Restate
- Blacksmith vs RubyMine
- Blacksmith vs Soketi
- Blacksmith vs SonarQube
- Blacksmith vs Sourcegraph
- Blacksmith vs pnpm
- Blacksmith vs Turborepo
- Blacksmith vs Prettier
- Blacksmith vs Bazel
- Blacksmith vs Vite
- Blacksmith vs Moonrepo
- Blacksmith vs Pants Build
- Blacksmith vs Buildkite
- Blacksmith vs Helm
- Blacksmith vs Azure DevOps
- Blacksmith vs Helix
- Blacksmith vs JetBrains Rider
- Blacksmith vs Spacelift
- Blacksmith vs Argo CD
- Yarn vs WarpBuild
- Yarn vs Depot
- Yarn vs Namespace
- Yarn vs Earthly
- Yarn vs Nx Cloud
- Yarn vs OpsLevel
- Yarn vs Garden
- Yarn vs ConfigCat
- Yarn vs Dagger
- Yarn vs Nix
- Yarn vs Rust
- Yarn vs Ansible
- Yarn vs Refact
- Yarn vs Restate
- Yarn vs RubyMine
- Yarn vs Soketi
- Yarn vs SonarQube
- Yarn vs Sourcegraph
- Yarn vs pnpm
- Yarn vs Turborepo
- Yarn vs Prettier
- Yarn vs Bazel
- Yarn vs Vite
- Yarn vs Moonrepo
- Yarn vs Pants Build
- Yarn vs Buildkite
- Yarn vs Helm
- Yarn vs Azure DevOps
- Yarn vs Helix
- Yarn vs JetBrains Rider
- Yarn vs Spacelift
- Yarn vs Argo CD

