Developer Tools · head to head
Blacksmith vs Cody

Blacksmith
Developer Tools
2x faster GitHub Actions with 60% cost savings
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Blacksmith per-minute pricing model requires estimating usage to predict costs; Cody sourcegraph now publishes a single Enterprise plan starting at $16K, with no free or individual Pro tier listed on the pricing page
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Blacksmith and Cody actually diverge.
| Attribute | Blacksmith | Cody |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Unknown | freemium |
| Platforms | GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS | Web |
| Founded | Unknown | 2013 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Developer Tools).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Blacksmith
- Bare metal runners
- Multiple OS support
- ARM support
- Docker layer caching
- Sticky disks
- GitHub Actions observability
- Free tier
- Static IPs
Only in Cody
Nothing recorded that Blacksmith does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Blacksmith
- Replacing GitHub Actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructurenot Cody
- Accelerating CI build times for organizations with heavy CI loadnot Cody
- Reducing cloud spend on GitHub Actions by 60% or morenot Cody
- Supporting ARM architecture builds without GitHub runnersnot Cody
Cody
- Code completion and intelligent autocomplete in IDEsnot Blacksmith
- Developer chat with codebase context awarenessnot Blacksmith
- Automated debugging and error identificationnot Blacksmith
- Customizable prompts for workflow automationnot Blacksmith
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Blacksmith
- Per-minute pricing model requires estimating usage to predict costs
- macOS M4 pricing ($0.08/min) is significantly higher than GitHub Actions
- Docker layer caching and sticky disks are paid add-ons at $0.50/GB/mo
- Static IP add-on costs $100/IP/mo
Cody
- Sourcegraph now publishes a single Enterprise plan starting at $16K, with no free or individual Pro tier listed on the pricing page
- sourcegraph.com/cody redirects to the documentation rather than a Cody product or pricing page
- AI features are metered as credits included per user, and exceeding the allocation requires buying a higher volume bucket
- Volume credit buckets are sold as an add-on rather than included
- A customer success manager and premium support are optional paid extras on top of the Enterprise plan
- Standard support is 24x5 rather than 24x7, with round-the-clock coverage sold as an upgrade
- The published $16K figure is a starting price that scales with team size, so the actual cost is quoted rather than listed
Pricing, plan by plan
Blacksmith
Free- Ubuntu x64$0.004/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- Ubuntu ARM$0.0025/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- Windows x64$0.008/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- macOS M4$0.08/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
Cody
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Cody review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Blacksmith if
- You need bare metal runners.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS.
- You also want multiple os support.
Questions people ask
- Is Blacksmith or Cody better?
- Neither clearly leads. Blacksmith starts at Free and Cody at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Blacksmith or Cody?
- Blacksmith starts at Free and Cody at Free.
- Does Blacksmith or Cody run on more platforms?
- Blacksmith runs on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS. Cody runs on Web.
- Can I use Blacksmith for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Blacksmith best used for?
- Blacksmith is most often used for replacing github actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructure, accelerating ci build times for organizations with heavy ci load, reducing cloud spend on github actions by 60% or more, supporting arm architecture builds without github runners. Of those, replacing github actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructure and accelerating ci build times for organizations with heavy ci load are not what Cody is typically brought in for.
- What can Blacksmith do that Cody cannot?
- Blacksmith covers Bare metal runners, Multiple OS support, ARM support, Docker layer caching.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Blacksmith: How much do Blacksmith runners cost compared to GitHub Actions?
Blacksmith offers 60-75% cost savings depending on OS. Ubuntu x64 costs $0.004/min vs GitHub at $0.012/min. All plans include 3,000 free minutes monthly.
SourceCody: Is Cody free?
Cody offers a free tier for individual developers via VS Code, JetBrains, Visual Studio, and the web app. Unlimited free usage is available for solo developers.
SourceBlacksmith: Can I use Docker layer caching with Blacksmith?
Yes, Docker layer caching is available as an add-on at $0.50/GB/mo. Managed Docker layer persistence is included with the base service.
SourceCody: What does Cody Enterprise cost?
Cody Enterprise pricing is custom and requires contacting Sourcegraph sales. It is available for Sourcegraph Enterprise customers and must be quoted based on your deployment and usage needs.
SourceBlacksmith: What is the SLA for Enterprise plans?
Enterprise Blacksmith plans include a 99.9% SLA guarantee along with 24/7 priority support, dedicated Slack channels, white-glove onboarding, and CI optimization support.
SourceCody: What LLMs does Cody use?
Cody uses the latest large language models for code completions, chat, and debugging. It leverages Sourcegraph's advanced Search API to pull codebase context from local and remote repositories.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Blacksmith vs WarpBuild
- Blacksmith vs Depot
- Blacksmith vs Namespace
- Blacksmith vs Earthly
- Blacksmith vs Nx Cloud
- Blacksmith vs OpsLevel
- Blacksmith vs Garden
- Blacksmith vs ConfigCat
- Blacksmith vs Dagger
- Blacksmith vs Nix
- Blacksmith vs Rust
- Blacksmith vs Ansible
- Blacksmith vs Refact
- Blacksmith vs Restate
- Blacksmith vs RubyMine
- Blacksmith vs Soketi
- Blacksmith vs SonarQube
- Blacksmith vs Sourcegraph
- Blacksmith vs Turborepo
- Blacksmith vs Visual Studio Code
- Blacksmith vs ESLint
- Blacksmith vs pnpm
- Blacksmith vs Sweep
- Blacksmith vs GitHub Copilot
- Blacksmith vs Bazel
- Blacksmith vs Fig
- Blacksmith vs GoLand
- Blacksmith vs Warp
- Blacksmith vs Claude Code
- Blacksmith vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Blacksmith vs Cortex
- Blacksmith vs Deno
- Blacksmith vs PhpStorm
- Cody vs WarpBuild
- Cody vs Depot
- Cody vs Namespace
- Cody vs Earthly
- Cody vs Nx Cloud
- Cody vs OpsLevel
- Cody vs Garden
- Cody vs ConfigCat
- Cody vs Dagger
- Cody vs Nix
- Cody vs Rust
- Cody vs Ansible
- Cody vs Refact
- Cody vs Restate
- Cody vs RubyMine
- Cody vs Soketi
- Cody vs SonarQube
- Cody vs Sourcegraph
- Cody vs Turborepo
- Cody vs Visual Studio Code
- Cody vs ESLint
- Cody vs pnpm
- Cody vs Sweep
- Cody vs GitHub Copilot
- Cody vs Bazel
- Cody vs Fig
- Cody vs GoLand
- Cody vs Warp
- Cody vs Claude Code
- Cody vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Cody vs Cortex
- Cody vs Deno
- Cody vs PhpStorm

