Developer Tools · head to head
Blacksmith vs Puppeteer

Blacksmith
Developer Tools
2x faster GitHub Actions with 60% cost savings
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Blacksmith per-minute pricing model requires estimating usage to predict costs; Puppeteer chrome and Firefox only, with no Safari or WebKit story
- They diverge on capability: Blacksmith covers Bare metal runners, Puppeteer covers DevTools Protocol.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Blacksmith and Puppeteer actually diverge.
| Attribute | Blacksmith | Puppeteer |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Unknown | Open source, no licence fee |
| Platforms | GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS | Linux, macOS, Windows |
| Category | Developer Tools | Testing |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Blacksmith
- Bare metal runners
- Multiple OS support
- ARM support
- Docker layer caching
- Sticky disks
- GitHub Actions observability
- Free tier
- Static IPs
Only in Puppeteer
- DevTools Protocol
- Headless by default
- PDF and screenshots
- Network interception
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Blacksmith
- Replacing GitHub Actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructurenot Puppeteer
- Accelerating CI build times for organizations with heavy CI loadnot Puppeteer
- Reducing cloud spend on GitHub Actions by 60% or morenot Puppeteer
- Supporting ARM architecture builds without GitHub runnersnot Puppeteer
Puppeteer
- Generating PDFs or screenshots of rendered pages on a servernot Blacksmith
- Scraping sites that require JavaScript executionnot Blacksmith
- Automating browser tasks where a full test framework is unnecessarynot Blacksmith
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Blacksmith
- Per-minute pricing model requires estimating usage to predict costs
- macOS M4 pricing ($0.08/min) is significantly higher than GitHub Actions
- Docker layer caching and sticky disks are paid add-ons at $0.50/GB/mo
- Static IP add-on costs $100/IP/mo
Puppeteer
- Chrome and Firefox only, with no Safari or WebKit story
- Not a test framework: assertions, retries and reporting need Jest or similar bolted on
- Bundles a Chromium download, which makes installs large and awkward in constrained CI images
Pricing, plan by plan
Blacksmith
Free- Ubuntu x64$0.004/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- Ubuntu ARM$0.0025/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- Windows x64$0.008/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- macOS M4$0.08/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
Puppeteer
Free- PuppeteerFree
- Full functionality
- Unlimited tests
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose Blacksmith if
- You need bare metal runners.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS.
- You also want multiple os support.
Choose Puppeteer if
- You need devtools protocol.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows.
- You also want headless by default.
Questions people ask
- Is Blacksmith or Puppeteer better?
- Neither clearly leads. Blacksmith starts at Free and Puppeteer at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Blacksmith or Puppeteer?
- Blacksmith starts at Free and Puppeteer at Free.
- Does Blacksmith or Puppeteer run on more platforms?
- Blacksmith runs on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS. Puppeteer runs on Linux, macOS, Windows.
- Can I use Blacksmith for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Blacksmith best used for?
- Blacksmith is most often used for replacing github actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructure, accelerating ci build times for organizations with heavy ci load, reducing cloud spend on github actions by 60% or more, supporting arm architecture builds without github runners. Of those, replacing github actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructure and accelerating ci build times for organizations with heavy ci load are not what Puppeteer is typically brought in for.
- What can Blacksmith do that Puppeteer cannot?
- Blacksmith covers Bare metal runners, Multiple OS support, ARM support, Docker layer caching. Puppeteer covers DevTools Protocol, Headless by default, PDF and screenshots, Network interception.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Blacksmith: How much do Blacksmith runners cost compared to GitHub Actions?
Blacksmith offers 60-75% cost savings depending on OS. Ubuntu x64 costs $0.004/min vs GitHub at $0.012/min. All plans include 3,000 free minutes monthly.
SourcePuppeteer: Is Puppeteer free?
Yes, open source from the Chrome team.
Blacksmith: Can I use Docker layer caching with Blacksmith?
Yes, Docker layer caching is available as an add-on at $0.50/GB/mo. Managed Docker layer persistence is included with the base service.
SourcePuppeteer: Puppeteer or Playwright?
Playwright came from the same original team, adds WebKit and Firefox support, automatic waiting and a test runner. Puppeteer stays a focused Chrome automation library, which is simpler if automation rather than testing is the goal.
Blacksmith: What is the SLA for Enterprise plans?
Enterprise Blacksmith plans include a 99.9% SLA guarantee along with 24/7 priority support, dedicated Slack channels, white-glove onboarding, and CI optimization support.
SourcePuppeteer: Can Puppeteer generate PDFs?
Yes, and it is one of the most common uses — rendering a page and printing it to PDF server-side.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Blacksmith vs Visual Studio Code
- Blacksmith vs ESLint
- Blacksmith vs pnpm
- Blacksmith vs Turborepo
- Blacksmith vs GitHub Copilot
- Blacksmith vs Penpot
- Blacksmith vs Keycloak
- Blacksmith vs Rust
- Blacksmith vs CLion
- Blacksmith vs GNAT Pro
- Blacksmith vs IAR Embedded Workbench
- Blacksmith vs GNU Emacs
- Blacksmith vs Keil MDK
- Blacksmith vs Vite
- Blacksmith vs Bazel
- Blacksmith vs CodeSandbox
- Blacksmith vs Eclipse IDE
- Blacksmith vs Moonrepo
- Blacksmith vs CircleCI
- Blacksmith vs Insomnia
- Blacksmith vs BrowserStack
- Blacksmith vs BugHerd
- Blacksmith vs Cypress
- Blacksmith vs Playwright
- Blacksmith vs GitHub Actions
- Blacksmith vs Selenium
- Blacksmith vs Vitest
- Blacksmith vs Zephyr Scale
- Puppeteer vs Visual Studio Code
- Puppeteer vs ESLint
- Puppeteer vs pnpm
- Puppeteer vs Turborepo
- Puppeteer vs GitHub Copilot
- Puppeteer vs Penpot
- Puppeteer vs Keycloak
- Puppeteer vs Rust
- Puppeteer vs CLion
- Puppeteer vs GNAT Pro
- Puppeteer vs IAR Embedded Workbench
- Puppeteer vs GNU Emacs
- Puppeteer vs Keil MDK
- Puppeteer vs Vite
- Puppeteer vs Bazel
- Puppeteer vs CodeSandbox
- Puppeteer vs Eclipse IDE
- Puppeteer vs Moonrepo
- Puppeteer vs CircleCI
- Puppeteer vs Insomnia
- Puppeteer vs BrowserStack
- Puppeteer vs BugHerd
- Puppeteer vs Cypress
- Puppeteer vs Playwright
- Puppeteer vs GitHub Actions
- Puppeteer vs Selenium
- Puppeteer vs Vitest
- Puppeteer vs Zephyr Scale

