Developer Tools · head to head
Blacksmith vs Vitest

Blacksmith
Developer Tools
2x faster GitHub Actions with 60% cost savings
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Blacksmith per-minute pricing model requires estimating usage to predict costs; Vitest assumes Vite: projects on webpack or other bundlers lose the main advantage
- They diverge on capability: Blacksmith covers Bare metal runners, Vitest covers Shares Vite config.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Blacksmith and Vitest actually diverge.
| Attribute | Blacksmith | Vitest |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Unknown | Open source, no licence fee |
| Platforms | GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS | Linux, macOS, Windows |
| Category | Developer Tools | Testing |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Blacksmith
- Bare metal runners
- Multiple OS support
- ARM support
- Docker layer caching
- Sticky disks
- GitHub Actions observability
- Free tier
- Static IPs
Only in Vitest
- Shares Vite config
- Jest-compatible API
- Fast watch mode
- ESM and TypeScript native
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Blacksmith
- Replacing GitHub Actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructurenot Vitest
- Accelerating CI build times for organizations with heavy CI loadnot Vitest
- Reducing cloud spend on GitHub Actions by 60% or morenot Vitest
- Supporting ARM architecture builds without GitHub runnersnot Vitest
Vitest
- Unit testing an application already built with Vite, without a second build confignot Blacksmith
- Migrating from Jest for faster watch-mode feedbacknot Blacksmith
- Testing TypeScript and ESM code without transform configurationnot Blacksmith
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Blacksmith
- Per-minute pricing model requires estimating usage to predict costs
- macOS M4 pricing ($0.08/min) is significantly higher than GitHub Actions
- Docker layer caching and sticky disks are paid add-ons at $0.50/GB/mo
- Static IP add-on costs $100/IP/mo
Vitest
- Assumes Vite: projects on webpack or other bundlers lose the main advantage
- Younger than Jest, so some plugins and matchers in the Jest ecosystem have no equivalent
- Jest compatibility is close but not exact, and unusual Jest configurations still need work to port
Pricing, plan by plan
Blacksmith
Free- Ubuntu x64$0.004/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- Ubuntu ARM$0.0025/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- Windows x64$0.008/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- macOS M4$0.08/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
Vitest
Free- VitestFree
- Full functionality
- Unlimited tests
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose Blacksmith if
- You need bare metal runners.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS.
- You also want multiple os support.
Choose Vitest if
- You need shares vite config.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows.
- You also want jest-compatible api.
Questions people ask
- Is Blacksmith or Vitest better?
- Neither clearly leads. Blacksmith starts at Free and Vitest at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Blacksmith or Vitest?
- Blacksmith starts at Free and Vitest at Free.
- Does Blacksmith or Vitest run on more platforms?
- Blacksmith runs on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS. Vitest runs on Linux, macOS, Windows.
- Can I use Blacksmith for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Blacksmith best used for?
- Blacksmith is most often used for replacing github actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructure, accelerating ci build times for organizations with heavy ci load, reducing cloud spend on github actions by 60% or more, supporting arm architecture builds without github runners. Of those, replacing github actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructure and accelerating ci build times for organizations with heavy ci load are not what Vitest is typically brought in for.
- What can Blacksmith do that Vitest cannot?
- Blacksmith covers Bare metal runners, Multiple OS support, ARM support, Docker layer caching. Vitest covers Shares Vite config, Jest-compatible API, Fast watch mode, ESM and TypeScript native.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Blacksmith: How much do Blacksmith runners cost compared to GitHub Actions?
Blacksmith offers 60-75% cost savings depending on OS. Ubuntu x64 costs $0.004/min vs GitHub at $0.012/min. All plans include 3,000 free minutes monthly.
SourceVitest: Is Vitest free?
Yes, open source under the MIT licence.
Blacksmith: Can I use Docker layer caching with Blacksmith?
Yes, Docker layer caching is available as an add-on at $0.50/GB/mo. Managed Docker layer persistence is included with the base service.
SourceVitest: Is Vitest compatible with Jest?
The API is deliberately Jest-compatible and most migrations are mechanical, though unusual configurations and some ecosystem plugins need attention.
Blacksmith: What is the SLA for Enterprise plans?
Enterprise Blacksmith plans include a 99.9% SLA guarantee along with 24/7 priority support, dedicated Slack channels, white-glove onboarding, and CI optimization support.
SourceVitest: Do I need Vite to use Vitest?
It works without a Vite app but the main benefit — sharing one config and transform pipeline — only applies if you are already using Vite.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Blacksmith vs Visual Studio Code
- Blacksmith vs ESLint
- Blacksmith vs pnpm
- Blacksmith vs Turborepo
- Blacksmith vs GitHub Copilot
- Blacksmith vs Penpot
- Blacksmith vs Keycloak
- Blacksmith vs Rust
- Blacksmith vs CLion
- Blacksmith vs GNAT Pro
- Blacksmith vs IAR Embedded Workbench
- Blacksmith vs GNU Emacs
- Blacksmith vs Keil MDK
- Blacksmith vs Vite
- Blacksmith vs Bazel
- Blacksmith vs CodeSandbox
- Blacksmith vs Eclipse IDE
- Blacksmith vs Moonrepo
- Blacksmith vs CircleCI
- Blacksmith vs Insomnia
- Blacksmith vs BrowserStack
- Blacksmith vs BugHerd
- Blacksmith vs Cypress
- Blacksmith vs Playwright
- Blacksmith vs GitHub Actions
- Blacksmith vs Selenium
- Blacksmith vs Puppeteer
- Blacksmith vs Zephyr Scale
- Vitest vs Visual Studio Code
- Vitest vs ESLint
- Vitest vs pnpm
- Vitest vs Turborepo
- Vitest vs GitHub Copilot
- Vitest vs Penpot
- Vitest vs Keycloak
- Vitest vs Rust
- Vitest vs CLion
- Vitest vs GNAT Pro
- Vitest vs IAR Embedded Workbench
- Vitest vs GNU Emacs
- Vitest vs Keil MDK
- Vitest vs Vite
- Vitest vs Bazel
- Vitest vs CodeSandbox
- Vitest vs Eclipse IDE
- Vitest vs Moonrepo
- Vitest vs CircleCI
- Vitest vs Insomnia
- Vitest vs BrowserStack
- Vitest vs BugHerd
- Vitest vs Cypress
- Vitest vs Playwright
- Vitest vs GitHub Actions
- Vitest vs Selenium
- Vitest vs Puppeteer
- Vitest vs Zephyr Scale

