Developer Tools · head to head
Blacksmith vs Selenium

Blacksmith
Developer Tools
2x faster GitHub Actions with 60% cost savings
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Selenium
Testing
Browser automation framework and the W3C WebDriver standard
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Blacksmith per-minute pricing model requires estimating usage to predict costs; Selenium flaky tests are the standing complaint: explicit waits and synchronisation are the tester’s job, where newer tools handle it automatically
- They diverge on capability: Blacksmith covers Bare metal runners, Selenium covers W3C WebDriver.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Blacksmith and Selenium actually diverge.
| Attribute | Blacksmith | Selenium |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Unknown | Open source, no licence fee |
| Platforms | GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS | Linux, macOS, Windows, Web |
| Category | Developer Tools | Testing |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Blacksmith
- Bare metal runners
- Multiple OS support
- ARM support
- Docker layer caching
- Sticky disks
- GitHub Actions observability
- Free tier
- Static IPs
Only in Selenium
- W3C WebDriver
- Many language bindings
- Selenium Grid
- Broad browser support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Blacksmith
- Replacing GitHub Actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructurenot Selenium
- Accelerating CI build times for organizations with heavy CI loadnot Selenium
- Reducing cloud spend on GitHub Actions by 60% or morenot Selenium
- Supporting ARM architecture builds without GitHub runnersnot Selenium
Selenium
- Cross-browser testing where Safari and legacy browsers must be coverednot Blacksmith
- Teams whose test suites are written in Java or C# rather than JavaScriptnot Blacksmith
- Distributing a large suite across a grid of machinesnot Blacksmith
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Blacksmith
- Per-minute pricing model requires estimating usage to predict costs
- macOS M4 pricing ($0.08/min) is significantly higher than GitHub Actions
- Docker layer caching and sticky disks are paid add-ons at $0.50/GB/mo
- Static IP add-on costs $100/IP/mo
Selenium
- Flaky tests are the standing complaint: explicit waits and synchronisation are the tester’s job, where newer tools handle it automatically
- Setup involves drivers, versions and grid infrastructure that Playwright and Cypress bundle away
- Slower to run than tools that talk to browsers over a debugging protocol rather than WebDriver
Pricing, plan by plan
Blacksmith
Free- Ubuntu x64$0.004/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- Ubuntu ARM$0.0025/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- Windows x64$0.008/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- macOS M4$0.08/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
Selenium
Free- SeleniumFree
- Full functionality
- Unlimited tests
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose Blacksmith if
- You need bare metal runners.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS.
- You also want multiple os support.
Choose Selenium if
- You need w3c webdriver.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Web.
- You also want many language bindings.
Questions people ask
- Is Blacksmith or Selenium better?
- Neither clearly leads. Blacksmith starts at Free and Selenium at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Blacksmith or Selenium?
- Blacksmith starts at Free and Selenium at Free.
- Does Blacksmith or Selenium run on more platforms?
- Blacksmith runs on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS. Selenium runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Web.
- Can I use Blacksmith for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Blacksmith best used for?
- Blacksmith is most often used for replacing github actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructure, accelerating ci build times for organizations with heavy ci load, reducing cloud spend on github actions by 60% or more, supporting arm architecture builds without github runners. Of those, replacing github actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructure and accelerating ci build times for organizations with heavy ci load are not what Selenium is typically brought in for.
- What can Blacksmith do that Selenium cannot?
- Blacksmith covers Bare metal runners, Multiple OS support, ARM support, Docker layer caching. Selenium covers W3C WebDriver, Many language bindings, Selenium Grid, Broad browser support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Blacksmith: How much do Blacksmith runners cost compared to GitHub Actions?
Blacksmith offers 60-75% cost savings depending on OS. Ubuntu x64 costs $0.004/min vs GitHub at $0.012/min. All plans include 3,000 free minutes monthly.
SourceSelenium: Is Selenium free?
Yes, open source with no licence fee. Paid costs come from grid infrastructure or services like BrowserStack.
Blacksmith: Can I use Docker layer caching with Blacksmith?
Yes, Docker layer caching is available as an add-on at $0.50/GB/mo. Managed Docker layer persistence is included with the base service.
SourceSelenium: Selenium or Playwright?
Playwright handles waiting automatically and is faster to set up, which removes most flakiness complaints. Selenium wins on language breadth, browser coverage including Safari, and existing suites you already have.
Blacksmith: What is the SLA for Enterprise plans?
Enterprise Blacksmith plans include a 99.9% SLA guarantee along with 24/7 priority support, dedicated Slack channels, white-glove onboarding, and CI optimization support.
SourceSelenium: Is Selenium still relevant?
Yes. Its WebDriver protocol is a W3C standard implemented by every major browser, and very large existing suites are not rewritten cheaply.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Blacksmith vs Visual Studio Code
- Blacksmith vs ESLint
- Blacksmith vs pnpm
- Blacksmith vs Turborepo
- Blacksmith vs GitHub Copilot
- Blacksmith vs Penpot
- Blacksmith vs Keycloak
- Blacksmith vs Rust
- Blacksmith vs CLion
- Blacksmith vs GNAT Pro
- Blacksmith vs IAR Embedded Workbench
- Blacksmith vs GNU Emacs
- Blacksmith vs Keil MDK
- Blacksmith vs Vite
- Blacksmith vs Bazel
- Blacksmith vs CodeSandbox
- Blacksmith vs Eclipse IDE
- Blacksmith vs Moonrepo
- Blacksmith vs CircleCI
- Blacksmith vs Insomnia
- Blacksmith vs BrowserStack
- Blacksmith vs BugHerd
- Blacksmith vs Cypress
- Blacksmith vs Playwright
- Blacksmith vs GitHub Actions
- Blacksmith vs Puppeteer
- Blacksmith vs Vitest
- Blacksmith vs Zephyr Scale
- Selenium vs Visual Studio Code
- Selenium vs ESLint
- Selenium vs pnpm
- Selenium vs Turborepo
- Selenium vs GitHub Copilot
- Selenium vs Penpot
- Selenium vs Keycloak
- Selenium vs Rust
- Selenium vs CLion
- Selenium vs GNAT Pro
- Selenium vs IAR Embedded Workbench
- Selenium vs GNU Emacs
- Selenium vs Keil MDK
- Selenium vs Vite
- Selenium vs Bazel
- Selenium vs CodeSandbox
- Selenium vs Eclipse IDE
- Selenium vs Moonrepo
- Selenium vs CircleCI
- Selenium vs Insomnia
- Selenium vs BrowserStack
- Selenium vs BugHerd
- Selenium vs Cypress
- Selenium vs Playwright
- Selenium vs GitHub Actions
- Selenium vs Puppeteer
- Selenium vs Vitest
- Selenium vs Zephyr Scale
