Developer Tools · head to head
Blacksmith vs Caddy

Blacksmith
Developer Tools
2x faster GitHub Actions with 60% cost savings
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Blacksmith per-minute pricing model requires estimating usage to predict costs; Caddy smaller ecosystem than Nginx, so third-party guides and modules are fewer
- They diverge on capability: Blacksmith covers Bare metal runners, Caddy covers Automatic HTTPS.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Blacksmith and Caddy actually diverge.
| Attribute | Blacksmith | Caddy |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Unknown | Open source, no licence fee |
| Platforms | GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS | Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker |
| Category | Developer Tools | Cloud |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Blacksmith
- Bare metal runners
- Multiple OS support
- ARM support
- Docker layer caching
- Sticky disks
- GitHub Actions observability
- Free tier
- Static IPs
Only in Caddy
- Automatic HTTPS
- Caddyfile
- Reverse proxy
- Single binary
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Blacksmith
- Replacing GitHub Actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructurenot Caddy
- Accelerating CI build times for organizations with heavy CI loadnot Caddy
- Reducing cloud spend on GitHub Actions by 60% or morenot Caddy
- Supporting ARM architecture builds without GitHub runnersnot Caddy
Caddy
- Sites and services where expired certificates have caused outages beforenot Blacksmith
- Small deployments where Nginx configuration is more effort than the problem warrantsnot Blacksmith
- Reverse proxying internal services with TLS without a certificate workflownot Blacksmith
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Blacksmith
- Per-minute pricing model requires estimating usage to predict costs
- macOS M4 pricing ($0.08/min) is significantly higher than GitHub Actions
- Docker layer caching and sticky disks are paid add-ons at $0.50/GB/mo
- Static IP add-on costs $100/IP/mo
Caddy
- Smaller ecosystem than Nginx, so third-party guides and modules are fewer
- Adding plugins means rebuilding the binary rather than loading a module
- Under very high throughput Nginx generally still benchmarks ahead
- Automatic certificate issuance needs outbound internet access, which complicates air-gapped deployments
Pricing, plan by plan
Blacksmith
Free- Ubuntu x64$0.004/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- Ubuntu ARM$0.0025/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- Windows x64$0.008/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- macOS M4$0.08/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
Caddy
Free- CaddyFree
- Full functionality
- Commercial use permitted
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose Blacksmith if
- You need bare metal runners.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS.
- You also want multiple os support.
Choose Caddy if
- You need automatic https.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker.
- You also want caddyfile.
Questions people ask
- Is Blacksmith or Caddy better?
- Neither clearly leads. Blacksmith starts at Free and Caddy at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Blacksmith or Caddy?
- Blacksmith starts at Free and Caddy at Free.
- Does Blacksmith or Caddy run on more platforms?
- Blacksmith runs on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS. Caddy runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker.
- Can I use Blacksmith for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Blacksmith best used for?
- Blacksmith is most often used for replacing github actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructure, accelerating ci build times for organizations with heavy ci load, reducing cloud spend on github actions by 60% or more, supporting arm architecture builds without github runners. Of those, replacing github actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructure and accelerating ci build times for organizations with heavy ci load are not what Caddy is typically brought in for.
- What can Blacksmith do that Caddy cannot?
- Blacksmith covers Bare metal runners, Multiple OS support, ARM support, Docker layer caching. Caddy covers Automatic HTTPS, Caddyfile, Reverse proxy, Single binary.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Blacksmith: How much do Blacksmith runners cost compared to GitHub Actions?
Blacksmith offers 60-75% cost savings depending on OS. Ubuntu x64 costs $0.004/min vs GitHub at $0.012/min. All plans include 3,000 free minutes monthly.
SourceCaddy: Is Caddy free?
Yes, open source under the Apache 2.0 licence, free for commercial use.
Blacksmith: Can I use Docker layer caching with Blacksmith?
Yes, Docker layer caching is available as an add-on at $0.50/GB/mo. Managed Docker layer persistence is included with the base service.
SourceCaddy: What does automatic HTTPS mean?
Caddy obtains certificates from Let’s Encrypt or ZeroSSL on first request and renews them before expiry, with no cron job or configuration.
Blacksmith: What is the SLA for Enterprise plans?
Enterprise Blacksmith plans include a 99.9% SLA guarantee along with 24/7 priority support, dedicated Slack channels, white-glove onboarding, and CI optimization support.
SourceCaddy: Caddy or Nginx?
Caddy is dramatically simpler to configure and removes certificate management. Nginx has the larger ecosystem and better peak throughput.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Blacksmith vs WarpBuild
- Blacksmith vs Depot
- Blacksmith vs Namespace
- Blacksmith vs Earthly
- Blacksmith vs Nx Cloud
- Blacksmith vs OpsLevel
- Blacksmith vs Garden
- Blacksmith vs ConfigCat
- Blacksmith vs Dagger
- Blacksmith vs Nix
- Blacksmith vs Rust
- Blacksmith vs Ansible
- Blacksmith vs Refact
- Blacksmith vs Restate
- Blacksmith vs RubyMine
- Blacksmith vs Soketi
- Blacksmith vs SonarQube
- Blacksmith vs Sourcegraph
- Blacksmith vs HAProxy
- Blacksmith vs Packer
- Blacksmith vs Pulumi
- Blacksmith vs Portworx
- Blacksmith vs Podman
- Blacksmith vs Rancher
- Blacksmith vs Porter
- Blacksmith vs Flux
- Blacksmith vs Contabo
- Blacksmith vs Coolify
- Blacksmith vs Crossplane
- Blacksmith vs Dokku
- Blacksmith vs Encore
- Blacksmith vs Vagrant
- Blacksmith vs Buildah
- Blacksmith vs Kustomize
- Blacksmith vs Skopeo
- Blacksmith vs containerd
- Caddy vs WarpBuild
- Caddy vs Depot
- Caddy vs Namespace
- Caddy vs Earthly
- Caddy vs Nx Cloud
- Caddy vs OpsLevel
- Caddy vs Garden
- Caddy vs ConfigCat
- Caddy vs Dagger
- Caddy vs Nix
- Caddy vs Rust
- Caddy vs Ansible
- Caddy vs Refact
- Caddy vs Restate
- Caddy vs RubyMine
- Caddy vs Soketi
- Caddy vs SonarQube
- Caddy vs Sourcegraph
- Caddy vs HAProxy
- Caddy vs Packer
- Caddy vs Pulumi
- Caddy vs Portworx
- Caddy vs Podman
- Caddy vs Rancher
- Caddy vs Porter
- Caddy vs Flux
- Caddy vs Contabo
- Caddy vs Coolify
- Caddy vs Crossplane
- Caddy vs Dokku
- Caddy vs Encore
- Caddy vs Vagrant
- Caddy vs Buildah
- Caddy vs Kustomize
- Caddy vs Skopeo
- Caddy vs containerd

