Developer Tools · head to head
Blacksmith vs HAProxy

Blacksmith
Developer Tools
2x faster GitHub Actions with 60% cost savings
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Blacksmith per-minute pricing model requires estimating usage to predict costs; HAProxy configuration syntax is dense and unforgiving, with a steep initial learning curve
- They diverge on capability: Blacksmith covers Bare metal runners, HAProxy covers High throughput.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Blacksmith and HAProxy actually diverge.
| Attribute | Blacksmith | HAProxy |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Unknown | Open source, no licence fee |
| Platforms | GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS | Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted |
| Category | Developer Tools | Cloud |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Blacksmith
- Bare metal runners
- Multiple OS support
- ARM support
- Docker layer caching
- Sticky disks
- GitHub Actions observability
- Free tier
- Static IPs
Only in HAProxy
- High throughput
- Layer 4 and 7
- Health checking
- Rate limiting and ACLs
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Blacksmith
- Replacing GitHub Actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructurenot HAProxy
- Accelerating CI build times for organizations with heavy CI loadnot HAProxy
- Reducing cloud spend on GitHub Actions by 60% or morenot HAProxy
- Supporting ARM architecture builds without GitHub runnersnot HAProxy
HAProxy
- Load balancing at traffic levels where proxy efficiency shows up in the hardware billnot Blacksmith
- Precise traffic control — rate limits, sticky sessions, complex routing rulesnot Blacksmith
- TCP load balancing for databases and non-HTTP servicesnot Blacksmith
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Blacksmith
- Per-minute pricing model requires estimating usage to predict costs
- macOS M4 pricing ($0.08/min) is significantly higher than GitHub Actions
- Docker layer caching and sticky disks are paid add-ons at $0.50/GB/mo
- Static IP add-on costs $100/IP/mo
HAProxy
- Configuration syntax is dense and unforgiving, with a steep initial learning curve
- No automatic certificate management, unlike newer servers that treat it as default behaviour
- The built-in stats page is basic, so real observability needs exporters and dashboards
- A dedicated load balancer is more machinery than small deployments need
Pricing, plan by plan
Blacksmith
Free- Ubuntu x64$0.004/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- Ubuntu ARM$0.0025/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- Windows x64$0.008/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- macOS M4$0.08/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
HAProxy
Free- HAProxyFree
- Full functionality
- No usage limits
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose Blacksmith if
- You need bare metal runners.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS.
- You also want multiple os support.
Choose HAProxy if
- You need high throughput.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted.
- You also want layer 4 and 7.
Questions people ask
- Is Blacksmith or HAProxy better?
- Neither clearly leads. Blacksmith starts at Free and HAProxy at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Blacksmith or HAProxy?
- Blacksmith starts at Free and HAProxy at Free.
- Does Blacksmith or HAProxy run on more platforms?
- Blacksmith runs on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS. HAProxy runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted.
- Can I use Blacksmith for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Blacksmith best used for?
- Blacksmith is most often used for replacing github actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructure, accelerating ci build times for organizations with heavy ci load, reducing cloud spend on github actions by 60% or more, supporting arm architecture builds without github runners. Of those, replacing github actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructure and accelerating ci build times for organizations with heavy ci load are not what HAProxy is typically brought in for.
- What can Blacksmith do that HAProxy cannot?
- Blacksmith covers Bare metal runners, Multiple OS support, ARM support, Docker layer caching. HAProxy covers High throughput, Layer 4 and 7, Health checking, Rate limiting and ACLs.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Blacksmith: How much do Blacksmith runners cost compared to GitHub Actions?
Blacksmith offers 60-75% cost savings depending on OS. Ubuntu x64 costs $0.004/min vs GitHub at $0.012/min. All plans include 3,000 free minutes monthly.
SourceHAProxy: Is HAProxy free?
Yes, the community version is open source. HAProxy Technologies sells HAProxy Enterprise separately.
Blacksmith: Can I use Docker layer caching with Blacksmith?
Yes, Docker layer caching is available as an add-on at $0.50/GB/mo. Managed Docker layer persistence is included with the base service.
SourceHAProxy: HAProxy or Nginx?
HAProxy is a specialist load balancer with deeper balancing and health-check features. Nginx also serves static content and is more approachable, which is why it is more common as a general web server.
Blacksmith: What is the SLA for Enterprise plans?
Enterprise Blacksmith plans include a 99.9% SLA guarantee along with 24/7 priority support, dedicated Slack channels, white-glove onboarding, and CI optimization support.
SourceHAProxy: Does HAProxy handle TLS certificates automatically?
No. Certificate issuance and renewal are external, unlike Caddy where it is automatic.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Blacksmith vs WarpBuild
- Blacksmith vs Depot
- Blacksmith vs Namespace
- Blacksmith vs Earthly
- Blacksmith vs Nx Cloud
- Blacksmith vs OpsLevel
- Blacksmith vs Garden
- Blacksmith vs ConfigCat
- Blacksmith vs Dagger
- Blacksmith vs Nix
- Blacksmith vs Rust
- Blacksmith vs Ansible
- Blacksmith vs Refact
- Blacksmith vs Restate
- Blacksmith vs RubyMine
- Blacksmith vs Soketi
- Blacksmith vs SonarQube
- Blacksmith vs Sourcegraph
- Blacksmith vs Caddy
- Blacksmith vs Fastly
- Blacksmith vs Jaeger
- Blacksmith vs Vultr
- Blacksmith vs Contabo
- Blacksmith vs Koyeb
- Blacksmith vs Fireworks AI
- Blacksmith vs Go
- Blacksmith vs Proxmox VE
- Blacksmith vs VictoriaMetrics
- Blacksmith vs Northflank
- Blacksmith vs Oracle Cloud
- Blacksmith vs Orca Security
- Blacksmith vs Cilium
- Blacksmith vs Thanos
- Blacksmith vs Longhorn
- Blacksmith vs minikube
- Blacksmith vs OpenTelemetry
- HAProxy vs WarpBuild
- HAProxy vs Depot
- HAProxy vs Namespace
- HAProxy vs Earthly
- HAProxy vs Nx Cloud
- HAProxy vs OpsLevel
- HAProxy vs Garden
- HAProxy vs ConfigCat
- HAProxy vs Dagger
- HAProxy vs Nix
- HAProxy vs Rust
- HAProxy vs Ansible
- HAProxy vs Refact
- HAProxy vs Restate
- HAProxy vs RubyMine
- HAProxy vs Soketi
- HAProxy vs SonarQube
- HAProxy vs Sourcegraph
- HAProxy vs Caddy
- HAProxy vs Fastly
- HAProxy vs Jaeger
- HAProxy vs Vultr
- HAProxy vs Contabo
- HAProxy vs Koyeb
- HAProxy vs Fireworks AI
- HAProxy vs Go
- HAProxy vs Proxmox VE
- HAProxy vs VictoriaMetrics
- HAProxy vs Northflank
- HAProxy vs Oracle Cloud
- HAProxy vs Orca Security
- HAProxy vs Cilium
- HAProxy vs Thanos
- HAProxy vs Longhorn
- HAProxy vs minikube
- HAProxy vs OpenTelemetry

