Developer Tools · head to head
Blacksmith vs Porter

Blacksmith
Developer Tools
2x faster GitHub Actions with 60% cost savings
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Blacksmith has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Blacksmith per-minute pricing model requires estimating usage to predict costs; Porter pricing based on vCPU and memory can be expensive for small projects
- They diverge on capability: Blacksmith covers Bare metal runners, Porter covers Rapid deployment.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Blacksmith and Porter actually diverge.
| Attribute | Blacksmith | Porter |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $6/month |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS | AWS, GCP, Azure |
| Category | Developer Tools | Cloud |
Identical on both: pricing model (Unknown), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Blacksmith
- Bare metal runners
- Multiple OS support
- ARM support
- Docker layer caching
- Sticky disks
- GitHub Actions observability
- Free tier
- Static IPs
Only in Porter
- Rapid deployment
- Multi-cloud support
- Framework agnostic
- DevOps automation
- Enterprise compliance
- Cost optimization
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Blacksmith
- Replacing GitHub Actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructurenot Porter
- Accelerating CI build times for organizations with heavy CI loadnot Porter
- Reducing cloud spend on GitHub Actions by 60% or morenot Porter
- Supporting ARM architecture builds without GitHub runnersnot Porter
Porter
- Deploying Next.js applications with serverless backendsnot Blacksmith
- Scaling microservices across multiple cloud providersnot Blacksmith
- Running applications without dedicated DevOps staffnot Blacksmith
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Blacksmith
- Per-minute pricing model requires estimating usage to predict costs
- macOS M4 pricing ($0.08/min) is significantly higher than GitHub Actions
- Docker layer caching and sticky disks are paid add-ons at $0.50/GB/mo
- Static IP add-on costs $100/IP/mo
Porter
- Pricing based on vCPU and memory can be expensive for small projects
- Vendor lock-in to Porter platform despite multi-cloud support
- Limited customization for complex infrastructure requirements
Pricing, plan by plan
Blacksmith
Free- Ubuntu x64$0.004/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- Ubuntu ARM$0.0025/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- Windows x64$0.008/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- macOS M4$0.08/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
Porter
$6/month- Standard$undefined/usage
- RAM: $6 per month per GB
- vCPU: $13 per month per vCPU
- Unlimited applications
- Enterprise$undefined/custom
- Volume discounts available
- All Standard features
- Premium support
Which should you pick?
Choose Blacksmith if
- You need bare metal runners.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS.
- You also want multiple os support.
Choose Porter if
- You need rapid deployment.
- You work on AWS, GCP, Azure.
- You also want multi-cloud support.
Questions people ask
- Is Blacksmith or Porter better?
- Neither clearly leads. Blacksmith starts at Free and Porter at $6/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Blacksmith or Porter?
- Blacksmith has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Blacksmith and $6/month for Porter.
- Does Blacksmith or Porter run on more platforms?
- Blacksmith runs on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS. Porter runs on AWS, GCP, Azure.
- Can I use Blacksmith for free?
- Yes. Blacksmith has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Porter starts at $6/month.
- What is Blacksmith best used for?
- Blacksmith is most often used for replacing github actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructure, accelerating ci build times for organizations with heavy ci load, reducing cloud spend on github actions by 60% or more, supporting arm architecture builds without github runners. Of those, replacing github actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructure and accelerating ci build times for organizations with heavy ci load are not what Porter is typically brought in for.
- What can Blacksmith do that Porter cannot?
- Blacksmith covers Bare metal runners, Multiple OS support, ARM support, Docker layer caching. Porter covers Rapid deployment, Multi-cloud support, Framework agnostic, DevOps automation.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Blacksmith: How much do Blacksmith runners cost compared to GitHub Actions?
Blacksmith offers 60-75% cost savings depending on OS. Ubuntu x64 costs $0.004/min vs GitHub at $0.012/min. All plans include 3,000 free minutes monthly.
SourcePorter: How is Porter priced?
Porter uses pay-as-you-go pricing: $6 per month per GB of RAM and $13 per month per vCPU. You only pay for the resources your applications use, not cloud instance capacity.
SourceBlacksmith: Can I use Docker layer caching with Blacksmith?
Yes, Docker layer caching is available as an add-on at $0.50/GB/mo. Managed Docker layer persistence is included with the base service.
SourcePorter: Does Porter include cloud provider costs?
Porter pricing excludes underlying cloud provider costs (AWS, Azure, GCP), though cloud credits can offset those expenses.
SourceBlacksmith: What is the SLA for Enterprise plans?
Enterprise Blacksmith plans include a 99.9% SLA guarantee along with 24/7 priority support, dedicated Slack channels, white-glove onboarding, and CI optimization support.
SourcePorter: Do startups get special pricing?
Yes, nonprofits receive 50% off standard rates, and startups may qualify for special pricing programs.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Blacksmith vs WarpBuild
- Blacksmith vs Depot
- Blacksmith vs Namespace
- Blacksmith vs Earthly
- Blacksmith vs Nx Cloud
- Blacksmith vs OpsLevel
- Blacksmith vs Garden
- Blacksmith vs ConfigCat
- Blacksmith vs Dagger
- Blacksmith vs Nix
- Blacksmith vs Rust
- Blacksmith vs Ansible
- Blacksmith vs Refact
- Blacksmith vs Restate
- Blacksmith vs RubyMine
- Blacksmith vs Soketi
- Blacksmith vs SonarQube
- Blacksmith vs Sourcegraph
- Blacksmith vs Render
- Blacksmith vs Railway
- Blacksmith vs Qovery
- Blacksmith vs Fly.io
- Blacksmith vs Zeabur
- Blacksmith vs CapRover
- Blacksmith vs Coolify
- Blacksmith vs Encore
- Blacksmith vs Heroku
- Blacksmith vs Microsoft Azure
- Blacksmith vs SST
- Blacksmith vs Wasabi
- Blacksmith vs Akamai
- Blacksmith vs Alibaba Cloud
- Blacksmith vs Buildah
- Blacksmith vs Chef
- Blacksmith vs Cilium
- Porter vs WarpBuild
- Porter vs Depot
- Porter vs Namespace
- Porter vs Earthly
- Porter vs Nx Cloud
- Porter vs OpsLevel
- Porter vs Garden
- Porter vs ConfigCat
- Porter vs Dagger
- Porter vs Nix
- Porter vs Rust
- Porter vs Ansible
- Porter vs Refact
- Porter vs Restate
- Porter vs RubyMine
- Porter vs Soketi
- Porter vs SonarQube
- Porter vs Sourcegraph
- Porter vs Render
- Porter vs Railway
- Porter vs Qovery
- Porter vs Fly.io
- Porter vs Zeabur
- Porter vs CapRover
- Porter vs Coolify
- Porter vs Encore
- Porter vs Heroku
- Porter vs Microsoft Azure
- Porter vs SST
- Porter vs Wasabi
- Porter vs Akamai
- Porter vs Alibaba Cloud
- Porter vs Buildah
- Porter vs Chef
- Porter vs Cilium

