Developer Tools · head to head
Blacksmith vs containerd

Blacksmith
Developer Tools
2x faster GitHub Actions with 60% cost savings
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

containerd
Cloud
Industry-standard container runtime, and the engine inside Docker
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Blacksmith per-minute pricing model requires estimating usage to predict costs; containerd not a developer-facing tool: there is no build command and the CLI is deliberately minimal, so it needs companions like nerdctl or Buildah
- They diverge on capability: Blacksmith covers Bare metal runners, containerd covers Full container lifecycle.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Blacksmith and containerd actually diverge.
| Attribute | Blacksmith | containerd |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Unknown | Open source, no licence fee |
| Platforms | GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS | Linux, Windows |
| Category | Developer Tools | Cloud |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Blacksmith
- Bare metal runners
- Multiple OS support
- ARM support
- Docker layer caching
- Sticky disks
- GitHub Actions observability
- Free tier
- Static IPs
Only in containerd
- Full container lifecycle
- CRI support
- OCI compliant
- Snapshotter plugins
- Namespaces
- Stable API
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Blacksmith
- Replacing GitHub Actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructurenot containerd
- Accelerating CI build times for organizations with heavy CI loadnot containerd
- Reducing cloud spend on GitHub Actions by 60% or morenot containerd
- Supporting ARM architecture builds without GitHub runnersnot containerd
containerd
- Running the container runtime under a Kubernetes cluster after the Docker shim removalnot Blacksmith
- Building a platform or PaaS that needs to execute containersnot Blacksmith
- Reducing the moving parts on nodes that only ever run Kubernetes workloadsnot Blacksmith
- Embedding container execution inside another productnot Blacksmith
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Blacksmith
- Per-minute pricing model requires estimating usage to predict costs
- macOS M4 pricing ($0.08/min) is significantly higher than GitHub Actions
- Docker layer caching and sticky disks are paid add-ons at $0.50/GB/mo
- Static IP add-on costs $100/IP/mo
containerd
- Not a developer-facing tool: there is no build command and the CLI is deliberately minimal, so it needs companions like nerdctl or Buildah
- Debugging is lower-level than Docker, and error messages assume knowledge of the runtime internals
- Documentation is aimed at platform engineers, so newcomers usually find Docker or Podman material more useful
- No image building at all — that is out of scope by design
Pricing, plan by plan
Blacksmith
Free- Ubuntu x64$0.004/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- Ubuntu ARM$0.0025/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- Windows x64$0.008/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- macOS M4$0.08/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
containerd
Free- containerdFree
- Full functionality
- No usage limits
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose Blacksmith if
- You need bare metal runners.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS.
- You also want multiple os support.
Choose containerd if
- You need full container lifecycle.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows.
- You also want cri support.
Questions people ask
- Is Blacksmith or containerd better?
- Neither clearly leads. Blacksmith starts at Free and containerd at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Blacksmith or containerd?
- Blacksmith starts at Free and containerd at Free.
- Does Blacksmith or containerd run on more platforms?
- Blacksmith runs on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS. containerd runs on Linux, Windows.
- Can I use Blacksmith for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Blacksmith best used for?
- Blacksmith is most often used for replacing github actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructure, accelerating ci build times for organizations with heavy ci load, reducing cloud spend on github actions by 60% or more, supporting arm architecture builds without github runners. Of those, replacing github actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructure and accelerating ci build times for organizations with heavy ci load are not what containerd is typically brought in for.
- What can Blacksmith do that containerd cannot?
- Blacksmith covers Bare metal runners, Multiple OS support, ARM support, Docker layer caching. containerd covers Full container lifecycle, CRI support, OCI compliant, Snapshotter plugins.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Blacksmith: How much do Blacksmith runners cost compared to GitHub Actions?
Blacksmith offers 60-75% cost savings depending on OS. Ubuntu x64 costs $0.004/min vs GitHub at $0.012/min. All plans include 3,000 free minutes monthly.
Sourcecontainerd: Is containerd free?
Yes. It is an open-source CNCF graduated project with no licence fee.
Blacksmith: Can I use Docker layer caching with Blacksmith?
Yes, Docker layer caching is available as an add-on at $0.50/GB/mo. Managed Docker layer persistence is included with the base service.
Sourcecontainerd: Do I need containerd if I use Docker?
You already have it. Docker uses containerd underneath to run containers; it is not an alternative you install separately.
Blacksmith: What is the SLA for Enterprise plans?
Enterprise Blacksmith plans include a 99.9% SLA guarantee along with 24/7 priority support, dedicated Slack channels, white-glove onboarding, and CI optimization support.
Sourcecontainerd: Why did Kubernetes drop Docker for containerd?
Kubernetes talks to runtimes through the Container Runtime Interface. Docker did not speak CRI natively and needed a shim, so Kubernetes removed the shim and talks to containerd directly, which Docker was already using anyway.
containerd: Can containerd build images?
No. Image building is deliberately out of scope. Tools such as Buildah, BuildKit or Docker handle that.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Blacksmith vs WarpBuild
- Blacksmith vs Depot
- Blacksmith vs Namespace
- Blacksmith vs Earthly
- Blacksmith vs Nx Cloud
- Blacksmith vs OpsLevel
- Blacksmith vs Garden
- Blacksmith vs ConfigCat
- Blacksmith vs Dagger
- Blacksmith vs Nix
- Blacksmith vs Rust
- Blacksmith vs Ansible
- Blacksmith vs PartyKit
- Blacksmith vs PhpStorm
- Blacksmith vs Pieces for Developers
- Blacksmith vs RAD Studio
- Blacksmith vs Refact
- Blacksmith vs Podman
- Blacksmith vs K3s
- Blacksmith vs Crossplane
- Blacksmith vs OpenEBS
- Blacksmith vs DigitalOcean
- Blacksmith vs Portworx
- Blacksmith vs Northflank
- Blacksmith vs Microsoft Azure
- Blacksmith vs Qovery
- Blacksmith vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Blacksmith vs Vultr
- Blacksmith vs Akamai
- Blacksmith vs Alibaba Cloud
- Blacksmith vs CapRover
- Blacksmith vs Chef
- Blacksmith vs Buildah
- Blacksmith vs Skopeo
- containerd vs WarpBuild
- containerd vs Depot
- containerd vs Namespace
- containerd vs Earthly
- containerd vs Nx Cloud
- containerd vs OpsLevel
- containerd vs Garden
- containerd vs ConfigCat
- containerd vs Dagger
- containerd vs Nix
- containerd vs Rust
- containerd vs Ansible
- containerd vs PartyKit
- containerd vs PhpStorm
- containerd vs Pieces for Developers
- containerd vs RAD Studio
- containerd vs Refact
- containerd vs Podman
- containerd vs K3s
- containerd vs Crossplane
- containerd vs OpenEBS
- containerd vs DigitalOcean
- containerd vs Portworx
- containerd vs Northflank
- containerd vs Microsoft Azure
- containerd vs Qovery
- containerd vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- containerd vs Vultr
- containerd vs Akamai
- containerd vs Alibaba Cloud
- containerd vs CapRover
- containerd vs Chef
- containerd vs Buildah
- containerd vs Skopeo
