Developer Tools · head to head
Blacksmith vs Coolify

Blacksmith
Developer Tools
2x faster GitHub Actions with 60% cost savings
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Coolify
Cloud
Open source self-hosted platform that deploys applications and databases to servers you already own
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Blacksmith per-minute pricing model requires estimating usage to predict costs; Coolify commit history since June 2026 shows one maintainer at 73 commits and a second at 15 with nobody else above one, and the same two people also ship four other coolLabs products, so the project depends on a very small number of individuals.
- They diverge on capability: Blacksmith covers Bare metal runners, Coolify covers Git push deployments.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Blacksmith and Coolify actually diverge.
| Attribute | Blacksmith | Coolify |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Unknown | Open source, no licence fee |
| Platforms | GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS | Web, Linux, Docker, Self-hosted |
| Category | Developer Tools | Cloud |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Blacksmith
- Bare metal runners
- Multiple OS support
- ARM support
- Docker layer caching
- Sticky disks
- GitHub Actions observability
- Free tier
- Static IPs
Only in Coolify
- Git push deployments
- One-click services
- Automatic certificates
- Managed databases
- Docker Compose support
- Notifications
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Blacksmith
- Replacing GitHub Actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructurenot Coolify
- Accelerating CI build times for organizations with heavy CI loadnot Coolify
- Reducing cloud spend on GitHub Actions by 60% or morenot Coolify
- Supporting ARM architecture builds without GitHub runnersnot Coolify
Coolify
- Replacing a managed platform bill with a single Hetzner or DigitalOcean instance running a dozen small applicationsnot Blacksmith
- An agency hosting many low-traffic client sites on shared servers with certificates handled automaticallynot Blacksmith
- Self-hosting analytics, databases and internal tools from the one-click catalogue without writing Compose filesnot Blacksmith
- Deploying inside a country or jurisdiction where no managed platform operates a regionnot Blacksmith
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Blacksmith
- Per-minute pricing model requires estimating usage to predict costs
- macOS M4 pricing ($0.08/min) is significantly higher than GitHub Actions
- Docker layer caching and sticky disks are paid add-ons at $0.50/GB/mo
- Static IP add-on costs $100/IP/mo
Coolify
- Commit history since June 2026 shows one maintainer at 73 commits and a second at 15 with nobody else above one, and the same two people also ship four other coolLabs products, so the project depends on a very small number of individuals.
- Multi-server support is documented as experimental, load balancer configuration is manual, every server must share the same CPU architecture, and moving images between hosts requires you to run your own Docker registry.
- In self-hosted mode the Coolify machine holds every SSH key and secret with no documented high availability, so the dashboard host is a single point of failure that the paid Cloud tier fixes and self-hosting does not.
- Scheduled S3 backups cover PostgreSQL, MySQL, MariaDB and MongoDB only, so application persistent volumes are your responsibility and a restore is untested unless you test it yourself.
- Release cadence is fast enough that six patch versions shipped inside ten days in August 2026 against several hundred open issues, and because instances can update themselves a regression can reach a production host before you have read the changelog.
Pricing, plan by plan
Blacksmith
Free- Ubuntu x64$0.004/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- Ubuntu ARM$0.0025/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- Windows x64$0.008/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- macOS M4$0.08/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
Coolify
Free- Self-hostedFree
- Apache-2.0, no features held back
- Unlimited servers, applications and users
- You run, update and back up the dashboard yourself
- Cloud$5/month
- Connects 2 servers, then 3 US dollars a month per extra server
- Managed and updated Coolify dashboard with high availability
- Managed backups of the Coolify instance itself
Which should you pick?
Choose Blacksmith if
- You need bare metal runners.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS.
- You also want multiple os support.
Choose Coolify if
- You need git push deployments.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux, Docker, Self-hosted.
- You also want one-click services.
Questions people ask
- Is Blacksmith or Coolify better?
- Neither clearly leads. Blacksmith starts at Free and Coolify at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Blacksmith or Coolify?
- Blacksmith starts at Free and Coolify at Free.
- Does Blacksmith or Coolify run on more platforms?
- Blacksmith runs on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS. Coolify runs on Web, Linux, Docker, Self-hosted.
- Can I use Blacksmith for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Blacksmith best used for?
- Blacksmith is most often used for replacing github actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructure, accelerating ci build times for organizations with heavy ci load, reducing cloud spend on github actions by 60% or more, supporting arm architecture builds without github runners. Of those, replacing github actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructure and accelerating ci build times for organizations with heavy ci load are not what Coolify is typically brought in for.
- What can Blacksmith do that Coolify cannot?
- Blacksmith covers Bare metal runners, Multiple OS support, ARM support, Docker layer caching. Coolify covers Git push deployments, One-click services, Automatic certificates, Managed databases.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Blacksmith: How much do Blacksmith runners cost compared to GitHub Actions?
Blacksmith offers 60-75% cost savings depending on OS. Ubuntu x64 costs $0.004/min vs GitHub at $0.012/min. All plans include 3,000 free minutes monthly.
SourceCoolify: Is anything held back for the paid tier?
No. Coolify Cloud hosts, updates and backs up the dashboard and gives it high availability. Every feature that touches your applications is in the Apache-2.0 build you can run yourself.
Blacksmith: Can I use Docker layer caching with Blacksmith?
Yes, Docker layer caching is available as an add-on at $0.50/GB/mo. Managed Docker layer persistence is included with the base service.
SourceCoolify: What does Coolify Cloud cost?
Five US dollars a month connects two servers, and each additional server is three dollars a month, with 20 per cent off for annual billing. You still supply and pay for the servers themselves.
Blacksmith: What is the SLA for Enterprise plans?
Enterprise Blacksmith plans include a 99.9% SLA guarantee along with 24/7 priority support, dedicated Slack channels, white-glove onboarding, and CI optimization support.
SourceCoolify: Does it back up my application data?
It backs up PostgreSQL, MySQL, MariaDB and MongoDB to S3 on a schedule. Application persistent volumes are not covered, so anything stored outside a managed database needs your own backup plan.
Coolify: Can I run it across several servers?
Yes, but the documentation calls multi-server experimental. Load balancing is not configured for you, all nodes must share a CPU architecture, and you need to run your own Docker registry.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Blacksmith vs WarpBuild
- Blacksmith vs Depot
- Blacksmith vs Namespace
- Blacksmith vs Earthly
- Blacksmith vs Nx Cloud
- Blacksmith vs OpsLevel
- Blacksmith vs Garden
- Blacksmith vs ConfigCat
- Blacksmith vs Dagger
- Blacksmith vs Nix
- Blacksmith vs Rust
- Blacksmith vs Ansible
- Blacksmith vs PartyKit
- Blacksmith vs PhpStorm
- Blacksmith vs Pieces for Developers
- Blacksmith vs RAD Studio
- Blacksmith vs Refact
- Blacksmith vs Render
- Blacksmith vs Railway
- Blacksmith vs Heroku
- Blacksmith vs CapRover
- Blacksmith vs Dokku
- Blacksmith vs Fly.io
- Blacksmith vs Qovery
- Blacksmith vs Porter
- Blacksmith vs Zeabur
- Blacksmith vs Northflank
- Blacksmith vs SST
- Blacksmith vs Encore
- Blacksmith vs HAProxy
- Blacksmith vs IBM Cloud
- Blacksmith vs kind
- Blacksmith vs Koyeb
- Blacksmith vs Kustomize
- Blacksmith vs Linkerd
- Coolify vs WarpBuild
- Coolify vs Depot
- Coolify vs Namespace
- Coolify vs Earthly
- Coolify vs Nx Cloud
- Coolify vs OpsLevel
- Coolify vs Garden
- Coolify vs ConfigCat
- Coolify vs Dagger
- Coolify vs Nix
- Coolify vs Rust
- Coolify vs Ansible
- Coolify vs PartyKit
- Coolify vs PhpStorm
- Coolify vs Pieces for Developers
- Coolify vs RAD Studio
- Coolify vs Refact
- Coolify vs Render
- Coolify vs Railway
- Coolify vs Heroku
- Coolify vs CapRover
- Coolify vs Dokku
- Coolify vs Fly.io
- Coolify vs Qovery
- Coolify vs Porter
- Coolify vs Zeabur
- Coolify vs Northflank
- Coolify vs SST
- Coolify vs Encore
- Coolify vs HAProxy
- Coolify vs IBM Cloud
- Coolify vs kind
- Coolify vs Koyeb
- Coolify vs Kustomize
- Coolify vs Linkerd
