Developer Tools · head to head
Blacksmith vs Vagrant

Blacksmith
Developer Tools
2x faster GitHub Actions with 60% cost savings
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Blacksmith per-minute pricing model requires estimating usage to predict costs; Vagrant vagrant 2.4.3 and later is licensed under the Business Source License 1.1 with IBM Corporation as licensor, not an OSI open source licence
- They diverge on capability: Blacksmith covers Bare metal runners, Vagrant covers Box management.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Blacksmith and Vagrant actually diverge.
| Attribute | Blacksmith | Vagrant |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Unknown | open-source |
| Platforms | GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS | Linux, Windows, Mac |
| Category | Developer Tools | Cloud |
| Founded | Unknown | 2010 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Blacksmith
- Bare metal runners
- Multiple OS support
- ARM support
- Docker layer caching
- Sticky disks
- GitHub Actions observability
- Free tier
- Static IPs
Only in Vagrant
- Box management
- Provider support
- Multi-machine setups
- Provisioners
- Networking
- Synced folders
- Snapshots
- Plugins
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Blacksmith
- Replacing GitHub Actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructurenot Vagrant
- Accelerating CI build times for organizations with heavy CI loadnot Vagrant
- Reducing cloud spend on GitHub Actions by 60% or morenot Vagrant
- Supporting ARM architecture builds without GitHub runnersnot Vagrant
Vagrant
- Reproducible local development environments defined in a Vagrantfilenot Blacksmith
- Provisioning identical VMs across VirtualBox, VMware and Hyper-V for a teamnot Blacksmith
- Sandboxing multi-machine setups on a developer laptopnot Blacksmith
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Blacksmith
- Per-minute pricing model requires estimating usage to predict costs
- macOS M4 pricing ($0.08/min) is significantly higher than GitHub Actions
- Docker layer caching and sticky disks are paid add-ons at $0.50/GB/mo
- Static IP add-on costs $100/IP/mo
Vagrant
- Vagrant 2.4.3 and later is licensed under the Business Source License 1.1 with IBM Corporation as licensor, not an OSI open source licence
- The Additional Use Grant forbids offering Vagrant to third parties on a hosted or embedded basis in a paid product that competes with IBM's paid versions of Vagrant
- Each version converts to the MPL 2.0 Change License only four years after that version is first published
- Uses that fall outside the Additional Use Grant require a separately negotiated licence from the licensor
Pricing, plan by plan
Blacksmith
Free- Ubuntu x64$0.004/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- Ubuntu ARM$0.0025/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- Windows x64$0.008/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- macOS M4$0.08/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
Vagrant
Free- Open SourceFree
- Development environment provisioning
- Multiple providers
- Provisioner support
Which should you pick?
Choose Blacksmith if
- You need bare metal runners.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS.
- You also want multiple os support.
Choose Vagrant if
- You need box management.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Mac.
- You also want provider support.
Questions people ask
- Is Blacksmith or Vagrant better?
- Neither clearly leads. Blacksmith starts at Free and Vagrant at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Blacksmith or Vagrant?
- Blacksmith starts at Free and Vagrant at Free.
- Does Blacksmith or Vagrant run on more platforms?
- Blacksmith runs on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS. Vagrant runs on Linux, Windows, Mac.
- Can I use Blacksmith for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Blacksmith best used for?
- Blacksmith is most often used for replacing github actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructure, accelerating ci build times for organizations with heavy ci load, reducing cloud spend on github actions by 60% or more, supporting arm architecture builds without github runners. Of those, replacing github actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructure and accelerating ci build times for organizations with heavy ci load are not what Vagrant is typically brought in for.
- What can Blacksmith do that Vagrant cannot?
- Blacksmith covers Bare metal runners, Multiple OS support, ARM support, Docker layer caching. Vagrant covers Box management, Provider support, Multi-machine setups, Provisioners.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Blacksmith: How much do Blacksmith runners cost compared to GitHub Actions?
Blacksmith offers 60-75% cost savings depending on OS. Ubuntu x64 costs $0.004/min vs GitHub at $0.012/min. All plans include 3,000 free minutes monthly.
SourceVagrant: Is Vagrant free to use?
Vagrant is a free, open-source command-line utility for managing virtual machine lifecycles.
SourceBlacksmith: Can I use Docker layer caching with Blacksmith?
Yes, Docker layer caching is available as an add-on at $0.50/GB/mo. Managed Docker layer persistence is included with the base service.
SourceVagrant: Does Vagrant offer a paid tier?
Vagrant itself is free. HashiCorp offers a HCP Vagrant Registry with a free tier for use with Vagrant.
SourceBlacksmith: What is the SLA for Enterprise plans?
Enterprise Blacksmith plans include a 99.9% SLA guarantee along with 24/7 priority support, dedicated Slack channels, white-glove onboarding, and CI optimization support.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Blacksmith vs WarpBuild
- Blacksmith vs Depot
- Blacksmith vs Namespace
- Blacksmith vs Earthly
- Blacksmith vs Nx Cloud
- Blacksmith vs OpsLevel
- Blacksmith vs Garden
- Blacksmith vs ConfigCat
- Blacksmith vs Dagger
- Blacksmith vs Nix
- Blacksmith vs Rust
- Blacksmith vs Ansible
- Blacksmith vs Refact
- Blacksmith vs Restate
- Blacksmith vs RubyMine
- Blacksmith vs Soketi
- Blacksmith vs SonarQube
- Blacksmith vs Sourcegraph
- Blacksmith vs DigitalOcean
- Blacksmith vs Neon
- Blacksmith vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Blacksmith vs Grafana Cloud
- Blacksmith vs Pulumi
- Blacksmith vs Portworx
- Blacksmith vs Serverless Framework
- Blacksmith vs Podman
- Blacksmith vs Caddy
- Blacksmith vs Rancher
- Blacksmith vs Infracost
- Blacksmith vs Porter
- Blacksmith vs SST
- Blacksmith vs Tencent Cloud
- Blacksmith vs Terragrunt
- Blacksmith vs Thanos
- Blacksmith vs Zeabur
- Blacksmith vs Zipkin
- Vagrant vs WarpBuild
- Vagrant vs Depot
- Vagrant vs Namespace
- Vagrant vs Earthly
- Vagrant vs Nx Cloud
- Vagrant vs OpsLevel
- Vagrant vs Garden
- Vagrant vs ConfigCat
- Vagrant vs Dagger
- Vagrant vs Nix
- Vagrant vs Rust
- Vagrant vs Ansible
- Vagrant vs Refact
- Vagrant vs Restate
- Vagrant vs RubyMine
- Vagrant vs Soketi
- Vagrant vs SonarQube
- Vagrant vs Sourcegraph
- Vagrant vs DigitalOcean
- Vagrant vs Neon
- Vagrant vs AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Vagrant vs Grafana Cloud
- Vagrant vs Pulumi
- Vagrant vs Portworx
- Vagrant vs Serverless Framework
- Vagrant vs Podman
- Vagrant vs Caddy
- Vagrant vs Rancher
- Vagrant vs Infracost
- Vagrant vs Porter
- Vagrant vs SST
- Vagrant vs Tencent Cloud
- Vagrant vs Terragrunt
- Vagrant vs Thanos
- Vagrant vs Zeabur
- Vagrant vs Zipkin

