Cloud · head to head
Caddy vs Garden

Garden
Developer Tools
Kubernetes development and testing automation with shared caching, now owned by Incredibuild
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Caddy smaller ecosystem than Nginx, so third-party guides and modules are fewer; Garden incredibuild acquired Garden in November 2024 and the pricing page now redirects to documentation, so there is no public commercial offer and no published roadmap for a team betting a platform on it.
- They diverge on capability: Caddy covers Automatic HTTPS, Garden covers Action graph.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Caddy and Garden actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (Open source, no licence fee), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Caddy
- Automatic HTTPS
- Caddyfile
- Reverse proxy
- Single binary
Only in Garden
- Action graph
- Shared result caching
- Remote Kubernetes environments
- In-cluster builds
- Same config everywhere
- Hot reload sync
- Helm and Kustomize support
- Templating
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Caddy
- Sites and services where expired certificates have caused outages beforenot Garden
- Small deployments where Nginx configuration is more effort than the problem warrantsnot Garden
- Reverse proxying internal services with TLS without a certificate workflownot Garden
Garden
- A platform team whose integration test suite takes longer than the coffee break and needs caching to cut the loopnot Caddy
- An organisation with thirty or more services on Kubernetes where docker-compose no longer approximates productionnot Caddy
- Giving every developer an ephemeral namespace instead of queuing for one shared staging environmentnot Caddy
- Running the identical build and test definition locally and in CI so failures reproduce on a laptopnot Caddy
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Caddy
- Smaller ecosystem than Nginx, so third-party guides and modules are fewer
- Adding plugins means rebuilding the binary rather than loading a module
- Under very high throughput Nginx generally still benchmarks ahead
- Automatic certificate issuance needs outbound internet access, which complicates air-gapped deployments
Garden
- Incredibuild acquired Garden in November 2024 and the pricing page now redirects to documentation, so there is no public commercial offer and no published roadmap for a team betting a platform on it.
- It is tightly bound to Kubernetes, so teams running on ECS, Nomad, plain VMs or serverless get little from it and would need a different tool entirely.
- The YAML action graph is a real configuration surface: a large monorepo needs someone to own and maintain Garden config as a first-class artefact, which is a standing platform-engineering cost.
- Shared remote environments mean every developer needs cluster access and a cost allocation model, so cloud spend rises and namespace sprawl becomes a thing you have to police.
- Caching correctness depends on declaring dependencies accurately; an under-declared action will serve a stale cached pass and hide a genuine test failure, which is a hard class of bug to notice.
Pricing, plan by plan
Caddy
Free- CaddyFree
- Full functionality
- Commercial use permitted
- Community support
Garden
Free- Garden open sourceFree
- Apache 2.0 licensed CLI
- Full action graph and caching
- Self-managed clusters
- Commercial tier$undefined/year
- Hosted caching and team features
- Support and onboarding
- Pricing no longer published since the Incredibuild acquisition
Which should you pick?
Choose Caddy if
- You need automatic https.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker.
- You also want caddyfile.
Choose Garden if
- You need action graph.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Kubernetes.
- You also want shared result caching.
Questions people ask
- Is Caddy or Garden better?
- Neither clearly leads. Caddy starts at Free and Garden at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Caddy or Garden?
- Caddy starts at Free and Garden at Free.
- Does Caddy or Garden run on more platforms?
- Caddy runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker. Garden runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Kubernetes.
- Can I use Caddy for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Caddy best used for?
- Caddy is most often used for sites and services where expired certificates have caused outages before, small deployments where nginx configuration is more effort than the problem warrants, reverse proxying internal services with tls without a certificate workflow. Of those, sites and services where expired certificates have caused outages before and small deployments where nginx configuration is more effort than the problem warrants are not what Garden is typically brought in for.
- What can Caddy do that Garden cannot?
- Caddy covers Automatic HTTPS, Caddyfile, Reverse proxy, Single binary. Garden covers Action graph, Shared result caching, Remote Kubernetes environments, In-cluster builds.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Caddy: Is Caddy free?
Yes, open source under the Apache 2.0 licence, free for commercial use.
Garden: Is Garden still maintained?
The open source project remains on GitHub under Incredibuild ownership, but the commercial pricing page redirects to the docs and there is no public paid offer.
Caddy: What does automatic HTTPS mean?
Caddy obtains certificates from Let’s Encrypt or ZeroSSL on first request and renews them before expiry, with no cron job or configuration.
Garden: Do I need Kubernetes?
Effectively yes. Garden is built around Kubernetes environments and offers little to teams on other runtimes.
Caddy: Caddy or Nginx?
Caddy is dramatically simpler to configure and removes certificate management. Nginx has the larger ecosystem and better peak throughput.
Garden: Does it replace my CI system?
No. It runs inside GitHub Actions, GitLab CI or similar and speeds up what those pipelines execute.
Garden: What is the actual saving?
It comes from skipping builds and tests whose inputs have not changed, so the benefit scales with how many services you have and how often only a few change.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Caddy vs HAProxy
- Caddy vs Packer
- Caddy vs Pulumi
- Caddy vs Portworx
- Caddy vs Podman
- Caddy vs Rancher
- Caddy vs Porter
- Caddy vs Flux
- Caddy vs Contabo
- Caddy vs Coolify
- Caddy vs Crossplane
- Caddy vs Dokku
- Caddy vs Encore
- Caddy vs Vagrant
- Caddy vs Buildah
- Caddy vs Kustomize
- Caddy vs Skopeo
- Caddy vs containerd
- Caddy vs Okteto
- Caddy vs Depot
- Caddy vs Earthly
- Caddy vs Ansible
- Caddy vs WarpBuild
- Caddy vs Nix
- Caddy vs Blacksmith
- Caddy vs Tilt
- Caddy vs Namespace
- Caddy vs ConfigCat
- Caddy vs OpsLevel
- Caddy vs Webpack
- Caddy vs Vite
- Caddy vs Bazel
- Caddy vs Daytona
- Caddy vs Eclipse IDE
- Garden vs HAProxy
- Garden vs Packer
- Garden vs Pulumi
- Garden vs Portworx
- Garden vs Podman
- Garden vs Rancher
- Garden vs Porter
- Garden vs Flux
- Garden vs Contabo
- Garden vs Coolify
- Garden vs Crossplane
- Garden vs Dokku
- Garden vs Encore
- Garden vs Vagrant
- Garden vs Buildah
- Garden vs Kustomize
- Garden vs Skopeo
- Garden vs containerd
- Garden vs Okteto
- Garden vs Depot
- Garden vs Earthly
- Garden vs Ansible
- Garden vs WarpBuild
- Garden vs Nix
- Garden vs Blacksmith
- Garden vs Tilt
- Garden vs Namespace
- Garden vs ConfigCat
- Garden vs OpsLevel
- Garden vs Webpack
- Garden vs Vite
- Garden vs Bazel
- Garden vs Daytona
- Garden vs Eclipse IDE

