Cybersecurity · head to head
Beyond Identity vs Depot

Beyond Identity
Cybersecurity
Phishing-resistant passwordless authentication with device trust enforced at every login
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No

Depot
Developer Tools
Cloud-based builds and CI runs 55x faster with less cost
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Only Depot has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Beyond Identity it is an authentication layer, not an identity provider, so you keep and keep paying for Okta or Entra ID underneath and the combined per-user cost is roughly double a single-vendor approach.; Depot developer plan minute limits may be insufficient for active development
- They diverge on capability: Beyond Identity covers Device-bound credentials, Depot covers Depot CI.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Beyond Identity and Depot actually diverge.
| Attribute | Beyond Identity | Depot |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | quote | Unknown |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android | Cloud, GitHub, CLI |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Developer Tools |
| Founded | Unknown | 2022 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Beyond Identity
- Device-bound credentials
- Continuous device posture
- No shared secrets
- Identity provider integration
- Secure developer signing
- Administrator policy engine
Only in Depot
- Depot CI
- Container builds
- GitHub Actions runners
- Distributed caching
- Build API
- Depot Registry
- Cross-platform builds
- SSH debugging
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Beyond Identity
- An organisation that suffered a breach through MFA push fatigue and needs a factor that cannot be socially engineerednot Depot
- A software company enforcing that code is only signed from a managed device with current patchesnot Depot
- A firm with contractors on unmanaged laptops that must meet posture requirements before reaching internal systemsnot Depot
- A security team wanting to remove passwords from the helpdesk workload rather than adding another factor on topnot Depot
Depot
- Accelerating Docker builds for container-based developmentnot Beyond Identity
- Replacing GitHub Actions runners with faster infrastructurenot Beyond Identity
- Distributing cache across Monorepo buildsnot Beyond Identity
- Debugging failed CI builds interactively with SSHnot Beyond Identity
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Beyond Identity
- It is an authentication layer, not an identity provider, so you keep and keep paying for Okta or Entra ID underneath and the combined per-user cost is roughly double a single-vendor approach.
- Every device that authenticates needs the platform authenticator installed, which makes onboarding contractors, third parties and shared kiosks awkward and sometimes impossible.
- Pricing is quoted per user with no published rates, so buyers cannot benchmark it against the increasingly capable passkey support now included in identity provider base licences.
- Losing all enrolled devices requires an administrative recovery path, and organisations that design that path poorly reintroduce a social-engineering target at the helpdesk.
- Legacy applications that only speak passwords or older protocols need a federation shim or stay outside the policy, so coverage is rarely complete in an estate with old systems.
Depot
- Developer plan minute limits may be insufficient for active development
- Startup plan at $200/mo is expensive for smaller teams
- Business plan requires custom pricing consultation
- macOS M2 runners not available on Developer plan
Pricing, plan by plan
Beyond Identity
On request- Secure Access Platform$undefined/year
- Per-user annual subscription quoted by seat count
- Deployed alongside an existing identity provider rather than replacing it
- Device posture integrations with major EDR and MDM vendors included
Depot
Free- Developer$20/month
- 1 user
- 500 Docker build minutes per month
- 2,000 Depot CI minutes per month
- Startup$200/month
- Unlimited users
- 5,000 Docker build minutes per month
- 20,000 Depot CI minutes per month
- Business$undefined/custom
- Custom pricing
- Unlimited users
- Custom monthly compute
Which should you pick?
Choose Beyond Identity if
- You need device-bound credentials.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android.
- You also want continuous device posture.
Choose Depot if
- You need depot ci.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, GitHub, CLI.
- You also want container builds.
Questions people ask
- Is Beyond Identity or Depot better?
- Neither clearly leads. Beyond Identity starts at On request and Depot at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Beyond Identity or Depot?
- Depot has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Beyond Identity and Free for Depot.
- Does Beyond Identity or Depot run on more platforms?
- Beyond Identity runs on Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android. Depot runs on Cloud, GitHub, CLI.
- Can I use Depot for free?
- Yes. Depot has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Beyond Identity starts at On request.
- What is Beyond Identity best used for?
- Beyond Identity is most often used for an organisation that suffered a breach through mfa push fatigue and needs a factor that cannot be socially engineered, a software company enforcing that code is only signed from a managed device with current patches, a firm with contractors on unmanaged laptops that must meet posture requirements before reaching internal systems, a security team wanting to remove passwords from the helpdesk workload rather than adding another factor on top. Of those, an organisation that suffered a breach through mfa push fatigue and needs a factor that cannot be socially engineered and a software company enforcing that code is only signed from a managed device with current patches are not what Depot is typically brought in for.
- What can Beyond Identity do that Depot cannot?
- Beyond Identity covers Device-bound credentials, Continuous device posture, No shared secrets, Identity provider integration. Depot covers Depot CI, Container builds, GitHub Actions runners, Distributed caching.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Beyond Identity: Does it replace Okta or Entra ID?
No. It sits in front of them as the authentication method. Budget for both.
Depot: How much faster are Depot runners compared to GitHub Actions?
Depot runners offer 30% faster CPUs and 10x faster networking than standard GitHub-hosted runners, enabling builds to complete significantly faster.
SourceBeyond Identity: What happens when a user loses their laptop?
They authenticate from another enrolled device, or go through an administrative recovery flow. Designing that recovery well matters, because it is the weakest point.
Depot: What is included in the Developer plan?
Developer plan ($20/month) includes 500 Docker build minutes, 2,000 Depot CI minutes, 2,000 GitHub Actions minutes, 25 GB storage, unlimited concurrency, and community support.
SourceBeyond Identity: Is it different from passkeys?
The credential mechanism is similar in spirit. The difference is enforcing device security posture at every authentication, which standard passkeys do not do.
Depot: Can I use Depot with my own AWS account?
Yes, Depot Managed allows deployment within customer AWS accounts. This is available to interested customers; contact sales for details.
SourceRelated pages
More on Beyond Identity
Other head to heads
- Beyond Identity vs 1Password
- Beyond Identity vs Cisco Duo
- Beyond Identity vs Transmit Security
- Beyond Identity vs Teleport
- Beyond Identity vs Authelia
- Beyond Identity vs authentik
- Beyond Identity vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Beyond Identity vs Clerk
- Beyond Identity vs Frontegg
- Beyond Identity vs HashiCorp Boundary
- Beyond Identity vs Logto
- Beyond Identity vs Ory
- Beyond Identity vs WorkOS
- Beyond Identity vs Zscaler Internet Access
- Beyond Identity vs Milestone XProtect
- Beyond Identity vs Osano
- Beyond Identity vs Proton Mail
- Beyond Identity vs Veriff
- Beyond Identity vs WarpBuild
- Beyond Identity vs Blacksmith
- Beyond Identity vs Nixpacks
- Beyond Identity vs Buildkite
- Beyond Identity vs GitLab CI/CD
- Beyond Identity vs Namespace
- Beyond Identity vs Earthly
- Beyond Identity vs Nx Cloud
- Beyond Identity vs Dagger
- Beyond Identity vs Garden
- Beyond Identity vs Ansible
- Beyond Identity vs ConfigCat
- Beyond Identity vs Avo
- Beyond Identity vs Azure DevOps
- Beyond Identity vs Backstage
- Beyond Identity vs Bitbucket
- Beyond Identity vs Claude Code
- Beyond Identity vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Depot vs 1Password
- Depot vs Cisco Duo
- Depot vs Transmit Security
- Depot vs Teleport
- Depot vs Authelia
- Depot vs authentik
- Depot vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Depot vs Clerk
- Depot vs Frontegg
- Depot vs HashiCorp Boundary
- Depot vs Logto
- Depot vs Ory
- Depot vs WorkOS
- Depot vs Zscaler Internet Access
- Depot vs Milestone XProtect
- Depot vs Osano
- Depot vs Proton Mail
- Depot vs Veriff
- Depot vs WarpBuild
- Depot vs Blacksmith
- Depot vs Nixpacks
- Depot vs Buildkite
- Depot vs GitLab CI/CD
- Depot vs Namespace
- Depot vs Earthly
- Depot vs Nx Cloud
- Depot vs Dagger
- Depot vs Garden
- Depot vs Ansible
- Depot vs ConfigCat
- Depot vs Avo
- Depot vs Azure DevOps
- Depot vs Backstage
- Depot vs Bitbucket
- Depot vs Claude Code
- Depot vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
