Developer Tools · head to head
Depot vs HashiCorp Boundary

Depot
Developer Tools
Cloud-based builds and CI runs 55x faster with less cost
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

HashiCorp Boundary
Cybersecurity
Identity-aware session broker for infrastructure access without distributing credentials
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Depot developer plan minute limits may be insufficient for active development; HashiCorp Boundary hashiCorp was acquired by IBM in February 2025 and Enterprise licensing now runs through IBM Passport Advantage; IBM has already retired HCP Vault Secrets, so Boundary's roadmap depends on IBM portfolio decisions rather than HashiCorp's own product strategy.
- They diverge on capability: Depot covers Depot CI, HashiCorp Boundary covers Identity-based access.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Depot and HashiCorp Boundary actually diverge.
| Attribute | Depot | HashiCorp Boundary |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Unknown | Open source, no licence fee |
| Platforms | Cloud, GitHub, CLI | Linux, macOS, Windows, Web |
| Category | Developer Tools | Cybersecurity |
| Founded | 2022 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Depot
- Depot CI
- Container builds
- GitHub Actions runners
- Distributed caching
- Build API
- Depot Registry
- Cross-platform builds
- SSH debugging
Only in HashiCorp Boundary
- Identity-based access
- Just-in-time credentials
- Dynamic host catalogues
- Session recording
- Transparent sessions
- Multi-hop workers
- Audit logging
- Terraform provider
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Depot
- Accelerating Docker builds for container-based developmentnot HashiCorp Boundary
- Replacing GitHub Actions runners with faster infrastructurenot HashiCorp Boundary
- Distributing cache across Monorepo buildsnot HashiCorp Boundary
- Debugging failed CI builds interactively with SSHnot HashiCorp Boundary
HashiCorp Boundary
- A platform team replacing shared SSH keys and a bastion host so that leavers lose access the moment they are removed from the identity providernot Depot
- Granting contractors time-boxed database access without ever issuing them a credential they could keepnot Depot
- An estate where autoscaling replaces hosts continuously and a static access list is always out of datenot Depot
- Producing session recordings as evidence for an audit that requires proof of who touched production and what they rannot Depot
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Depot
- Developer plan minute limits may be insufficient for active development
- Startup plan at $200/mo is expensive for smaller teams
- Business plan requires custom pricing consultation
- macOS M2 runners not available on Developer plan
HashiCorp Boundary
- HashiCorp was acquired by IBM in February 2025 and Enterprise licensing now runs through IBM Passport Advantage; IBM has already retired HCP Vault Secrets, so Boundary's roadmap depends on IBM portfolio decisions rather than HashiCorp's own product strategy.
- Enterprise pricing is not published anywhere, and the features most organisations actually need for compliance, notably session recording, are Enterprise only, so the free community edition is rarely the version you end up buying.
- It solves access to infrastructure, not to applications; browser-based internal tools, SaaS admin consoles and APIs need a separate control, so Boundary is one component of a zero-trust programme rather than the whole thing.
- Running it yourself means operating controllers, worker nodes and a Postgres database in a highly available configuration, and if that control plane is down nobody can reach production, which makes it a new critical dependency.
- It is materially easier to adopt if you already run Vault and Terraform; teams without that ecosystem face a steeper learning curve than a device-based mesh product like Tailscale, for a similar access outcome.
Pricing, plan by plan
Depot
Free- Developer$20/month
- 1 user
- 500 Docker build minutes per month
- 2,000 Depot CI minutes per month
- Startup$200/month
- Unlimited users
- 5,000 Docker build minutes per month
- 20,000 Depot CI minutes per month
- Business$undefined/custom
- Custom pricing
- Unlimited users
- Custom monthly compute
HashiCorp Boundary
Free- Boundary Community EditionFree
- MPL 2.0 open source
- Self-hosted controllers and workers
- Identity-based target access
- Boundary Enterprise$undefined/year
- Session recording and playback
- Multi-hop and transparent sessions
- Multi-tenancy via scopes
Which should you pick?
Choose Depot if
- You need depot ci.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, GitHub, CLI.
- You also want container builds.
Choose HashiCorp Boundary if
- You need identity-based access.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Web.
- You also want just-in-time credentials.
Questions people ask
- Is Depot or HashiCorp Boundary better?
- Neither clearly leads. Depot starts at Free and HashiCorp Boundary at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Depot or HashiCorp Boundary?
- Depot starts at Free and HashiCorp Boundary at Free.
- Does Depot or HashiCorp Boundary run on more platforms?
- Depot runs on Cloud, GitHub, CLI. HashiCorp Boundary runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Web.
- Can I use Depot for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Depot best used for?
- Depot is most often used for accelerating docker builds for container-based development, replacing github actions runners with faster infrastructure, distributing cache across monorepo builds, debugging failed ci builds interactively with ssh. Of those, accelerating docker builds for container-based development and replacing github actions runners with faster infrastructure are not what HashiCorp Boundary is typically brought in for.
- What can Depot do that HashiCorp Boundary cannot?
- Depot covers Depot CI, Container builds, GitHub Actions runners, Distributed caching. HashiCorp Boundary covers Identity-based access, Just-in-time credentials, Dynamic host catalogues, Session recording.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Depot: How much faster are Depot runners compared to GitHub Actions?
Depot runners offer 30% faster CPUs and 10x faster networking than standard GitHub-hosted runners, enabling builds to complete significantly faster.
SourceHashiCorp Boundary: Is Boundary open source?
The community edition is, under MPL 2.0. Boundary Enterprise is commercial and is now sold through IBM Passport Advantage.
Depot: What is included in the Developer plan?
Developer plan ($20/month) includes 500 Docker build minutes, 2,000 Depot CI minutes, 2,000 GitHub Actions minutes, 25 GB storage, unlimited concurrency, and community support.
SourceHashiCorp Boundary: Does it replace a VPN?
For infrastructure access, largely yes. It grants a session to a specific target rather than putting the user on a network, but it does not cover browser-based internal applications.
Depot: Can I use Depot with my own AWS account?
Yes, Depot Managed allows deployment within customer AWS accounts. This is available to interested customers; contact sales for details.
SourceHashiCorp Boundary: What does Boundary Enterprise cost?
HashiCorp does not publish Boundary pricing. It is quoted, and since the IBM acquisition it is transacted on IBM licensing paper.
HashiCorp Boundary: Do I need Vault to use it?
No, but the just-in-time credential brokering that makes Boundary worthwhile depends on Vault or an equivalent secrets store.
Related pages
More on HashiCorp Boundary
Other head to heads
- Depot vs WarpBuild
- Depot vs Blacksmith
- Depot vs Nixpacks
- Depot vs Buildkite
- Depot vs GitLab CI/CD
- Depot vs Namespace
- Depot vs Earthly
- Depot vs Nx Cloud
- Depot vs Dagger
- Depot vs Garden
- Depot vs Ansible
- Depot vs ConfigCat
- Depot vs Avo
- Depot vs Azure DevOps
- Depot vs Backstage
- Depot vs Bitbucket
- Depot vs Claude Code
- Depot vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Depot vs BeyondTrust
- Depot vs Teleport
- Depot vs Delinea
- Depot vs Infisical
- Depot vs 1Password
- Depot vs LastPass
- Depot vs authentik
- Depot vs Logto
- Depot vs Ory
- Depot vs Saviynt
- Depot vs Beyond Identity
- Depot vs One Identity
- Depot vs Keygen
- Depot vs KnowBe4
- Depot vs Legit Security
- Depot vs LogRhythm SIEM
- Depot vs Metasploit
- Depot vs MetricStream
- HashiCorp Boundary vs WarpBuild
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Blacksmith
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Nixpacks
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Buildkite
- HashiCorp Boundary vs GitLab CI/CD
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Namespace
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Earthly
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Nx Cloud
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Dagger
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Garden
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Ansible
- HashiCorp Boundary vs ConfigCat
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Avo
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Azure DevOps
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Backstage
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Bitbucket
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Claude Code
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- HashiCorp Boundary vs BeyondTrust
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Teleport
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Delinea
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Infisical
- HashiCorp Boundary vs 1Password
- HashiCorp Boundary vs LastPass
- HashiCorp Boundary vs authentik
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Logto
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Ory
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Saviynt
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Beyond Identity
- HashiCorp Boundary vs One Identity
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Keygen
- HashiCorp Boundary vs KnowBe4
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Legit Security
- HashiCorp Boundary vs LogRhythm SIEM
- HashiCorp Boundary vs Metasploit
- HashiCorp Boundary vs MetricStream
