Healthcare · head to head
DHIS2 vs Tebra

DHIS2
Healthcare
Open source health information platform run from the University of Oslo and used by national ministries
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Tebra
Healthcare
Practice management combining EHR, billing and patient engagement for independent practices
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only DHIS2 has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: DHIS2 the licence is free and the implementation is not; national rollouts routinely cost hundreds of thousands of dollars in configuration, hosting, training and support, and budgets built on the word free fail immediately.; Tebra no pricing amounts published; custom quote required based on practice configuration
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which DHIS2 and Tebra actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Healthcare).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in DHIS2
- Aggregate data reporting
- Tracker
- Android capture app
- Dashboards and analytics
- Metadata packages
- Data quality tools
- GIS mapping
- Interoperability
Only in Tebra
Nothing recorded that DHIS2 does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
DHIS2
- A ministry of health replacing paper monthly reporting from thousands of facilities with a national routine systemnot Tebra
- A donor-funded HIV or tuberculosis programme that must report standard indicators across several districtsnot Tebra
- A disease surveillance unit needing weekly case reporting with outbreak alerting and mappingnot Tebra
- An NGO running individual patient follow-up in a programme where facilities are frequently offlinenot Tebra
Tebra
- Consolidating scheduling, charting, billing into single systemnot DHIS2
- Automating claims submission and denial managementnot DHIS2
- Reducing appointment no-shows through automated remindersnot DHIS2
- Reducing documentation time to five minutes with AInot DHIS2
- E-prescribing controlled substances with PDMP and EPCSnot DHIS2
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
DHIS2
- The licence is free and the implementation is not; national rollouts routinely cost hundreds of thousands of dollars in configuration, hosting, training and support, and budgets built on the word free fail immediately.
- HISP UiO introduced a Shared Services Fee in 2025, so organisations that depend on DHIS2 are now being asked for an annual contribution that did not previously exist in their plans.
- Development funding comes from a small set of donors including Norad, the Global Fund and the Gates Foundation, which concentrates the platform's long-term direction in the priorities of those funders.
- Implementation capability is concentrated in regional HISP groups, so a country whose local HISP group is overstretched has few alternative suppliers with equivalent expertise.
- Analytics performance depends heavily on how metadata was designed at the outset, and a poorly structured initial configuration produces slow dashboards and bad indicator definitions that are painful to correct years later.
Tebra
- No pricing amounts published; custom quote required based on practice configuration
- Pricing based on per-provider licensing model with additional costs for EPCS setup and PDMP integration
Pricing, plan by plan
DHIS2
Free- DHIS2 softwareFree
- BSD licence
- All modules including Tracker
- No user or facility limits
- Shared Services Fee$undefined/year
- Voluntary annual contribution introduced by HISP UiO
- Funds shared global infrastructure and platform sustainability
- Amount agreed with the HISP Centre
- Implementation and support$undefined/year
- Delivered by regional HISP groups or private implementers
- Configuration, metadata design, hosting, training and support
- Quoted per programme, commonly the dominant cost
Tebra
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Tebra review.
Which should you pick?
Choose DHIS2 if
- You need aggregate data reporting.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Android, Self-hosted, Cloud.
- You also want tracker.
Choose Tebra if
Nothing in the data separates Tebra from DHIS2 on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Questions people ask
- Is DHIS2 or Tebra better?
- Neither clearly leads. DHIS2 starts at Free and Tebra at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, DHIS2 or Tebra?
- DHIS2 has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for DHIS2 and On request for Tebra.
- Does DHIS2 or Tebra run on more platforms?
- DHIS2 runs on Web, Android, Self-hosted, Cloud. Tebra runs on Web.
- Can I use DHIS2 for free?
- Yes. DHIS2 has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Tebra starts at On request.
- What is DHIS2 best used for?
- DHIS2 is most often used for a ministry of health replacing paper monthly reporting from thousands of facilities with a national routine system, a donor-funded hiv or tuberculosis programme that must report standard indicators across several districts, a disease surveillance unit needing weekly case reporting with outbreak alerting and mapping, an ngo running individual patient follow-up in a programme where facilities are frequently offline. Of those, a ministry of health replacing paper monthly reporting from thousands of facilities with a national routine system and a donor-funded hiv or tuberculosis programme that must report standard indicators across several districts are not what Tebra is typically brought in for.
- What can DHIS2 do that Tebra cannot?
- DHIS2 covers Aggregate data reporting, Tracker, Android capture app, Dashboards and analytics.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
DHIS2: Who owns and develops DHIS2?
The HISP Centre at the University of Oslo, funded by donors including Norad, the Global Fund, the Gates Foundation and Wellcome.
Tebra: How does Tebra's pricing model work?
Pricing is based on the number of clinical providers rather than user seats. Non-clinical staff get unlimited access at no additional cost. Low-volume providers billing under 100 claims monthly receive lower-tier pricing.
SourceDHIS2: Is DHIS2 free?
The software is free under a BSD licence. Implementation, hosting, training and support are not, and are the dominant cost.
Tebra: What are the setup and integration costs beyond the monthly fee?
Electronic Prescribing Controlled Substances (EPCS) setup costs approximately $75 per provider as a one-time fee. PDMP integration costs $500 one-time per facility plus approximately $50 per user per year.
SourceDHIS2: What is the Shared Services Fee?
A voluntary annual contribution introduced by HISP UiO in 2025 to fund shared global infrastructure and long-term platform sustainability.
Tebra: Are there volume discounts for practices using multiple modules?
Yes, bundled pricing and volume incentives are available for multi-module adoption. Practices can request a personalized quote to see potential savings.
SourceDHIS2: Can I buy commercial support?
Yes, from regional HISP groups or private implementers such as Devotta, which is contracted by HISP UiO for core platform development and also works independently.
Tebra: Does Tebra offer published pricing or is a quote always required?
Tebra does not publish specific monthly costs. Pricing varies depending on the number of providers, platform features needed, and implementation requirements. A personalized quote is required to get pricing.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- DHIS2 vs GNU Health
- DHIS2 vs OpenMRS
- DHIS2 vs Bahmni
- DHIS2 vs OpenClinica
- DHIS2 vs Open Dental
- DHIS2 vs Paige
- DHIS2 vs Ambra Health
- DHIS2 vs Koa Health
- DHIS2 vs Flo
- DHIS2 vs Quantum Health
- DHIS2 vs Beckman Coulter DxONE
- DHIS2 vs Fullscript
- DHIS2 vs Cerner PowerWorks
- DHIS2 vs ChiroTouch
- DHIS2 vs Doctolib
- DHIS2 vs Doximity
- DHIS2 vs eClinicalWorks
- DHIS2 vs eClinicalWorks Prime
- DHIS2 vs Athenahealth
- DHIS2 vs Epic Systems
- DHIS2 vs Cerner
- DHIS2 vs Amwell
- DHIS2 vs Dentrix
- DHIS2 vs RXNT
- DHIS2 vs Updox
- DHIS2 vs Kareo
- DHIS2 vs Healthie
- DHIS2 vs Allscripts Professional EHR
- DHIS2 vs Carestream Dental
- DHIS2 vs athenaOne
- DHIS2 vs Kareo Clinical
- DHIS2 vs Allscripts TouchWorks
- Tebra vs GNU Health
- Tebra vs OpenMRS
- Tebra vs Bahmni
- Tebra vs OpenClinica
- Tebra vs Open Dental
- Tebra vs Paige
- Tebra vs Ambra Health
- Tebra vs Koa Health
- Tebra vs Flo
- Tebra vs Quantum Health
- Tebra vs Beckman Coulter DxONE
- Tebra vs Fullscript
- Tebra vs Cerner PowerWorks
- Tebra vs ChiroTouch
- Tebra vs Doctolib
- Tebra vs Doximity
- Tebra vs eClinicalWorks
- Tebra vs eClinicalWorks Prime
- Tebra vs Athenahealth
- Tebra vs Epic Systems
- Tebra vs Cerner
- Tebra vs Amwell
- Tebra vs Dentrix
- Tebra vs RXNT
- Tebra vs Updox
- Tebra vs Kareo
- Tebra vs Healthie
- Tebra vs Allscripts Professional EHR
- Tebra vs Carestream Dental
- Tebra vs athenaOne
- Tebra vs Kareo Clinical
- Tebra vs Allscripts TouchWorks
