Healthcare · head to head
Aidoc vs Bahmni

Aidoc
Healthcare
FDA cleared radiology AI for triage and notification of time critical findings
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Bahmni
Healthcare
Open source hospital information system and EMR for low-resource hospitals, built on OpenMRS
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Bahmni has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Aidoc the clearances are for triage and notification in the CADt category, so the software may reorder a worklist but may not deliver a diagnosis or replace a read, and business cases built on reduced radiologist workload do not survive contact with the regulatory wording.; Bahmni the licence is free and the implementation is not; configuration, data migration, training and multi-year support from a partner routinely cost far more than a small commercial system would have, and hospitals that budget only for hardware stall.
- They diverge on capability: Aidoc covers Triage and notification, Bahmni covers OpenMRS clinical record.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Aidoc and Bahmni actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Healthcare).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Aidoc
- Triage and notification
- Intracranial haemorrhage
- Pulmonary embolism
- Large vessel occlusion
- Pneumothorax on X-ray
- aiOS platform
- Clinical workflow notifications
Only in Bahmni
- OpenMRS clinical record
- Configurable clinical forms
- Laboratory integration
- Billing and inventory
- Imaging
- Inpatient management
- Offline-capable clinical app
- Reporting
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Aidoc
- A regional stroke centre that wants large vessel occlusion flagged and the neurointervention team notified before the radiologist dictatesnot Bahmni
- A trauma centre wanting cervical spine fracture and intra abdominal free gas prioritised in an overnight queue read by one on call radiologistnot Bahmni
- An oncology imaging programme that wants incidental pulmonary embolism caught on staging CTs ordered for a different questionnot Bahmni
- A health system that has bought AI from several vendors and wants one PACS integration through aiOS rather than one integration per algorithmnot Bahmni
Bahmni
- A mission or charitable hospital in India or East Africa that cannot fund a commercial hospital information system licence but needs a real EMR rather than papernot Aidoc
- A ministry of health standardising district hospitals on one system and required by donors to use a recognised Digital Public Goodnot Aidoc
- An NGO health network wanting one clinical record across several facilities with reporting that can feed a national DHIS2 instancenot Aidoc
- A hospital that needs the clinical record, laboratory, pharmacy and billing to share one patient identity rather than running four disconnected systemsnot Aidoc
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Aidoc
- The clearances are for triage and notification in the CADt category, so the software may reorder a worklist but may not deliver a diagnosis or replace a read, and business cases built on reduced radiologist workload do not survive contact with the regulatory wording.
- Triage algorithms are tuned for sensitivity, so false positives are routine, and each one interrupts a radiologist. Sites that do not measure positive predictive value in their own case mix see clinician trust erode within months.
- Pricing is per algorithm and per study volume with no published rate card, so the cost of a multi algorithm deployment escalates sharply and cannot be benchmarked before a sales conversation.
- The clinical benefit accrues to stroke, trauma and cardiology service lines while the cost usually lands in the radiology or IT budget, which makes internal funding harder than the return on investment slides suggest.
- Performance depends on scanner protocols and reconstruction settings, so results validated at one site do not transfer, and each deployment needs local validation work that is rarely budgeted for.
Bahmni
- The licence is free and the implementation is not; configuration, data migration, training and multi-year support from a partner routinely cost far more than a small commercial system would have, and hospitals that budget only for hardware stall.
- There is no single vendor with an obligation to you unless you contract one, so upgrade timing, security patching and defect resolution depend on whichever partner you hired and how long they stay engaged.
- It integrates four substantial open source systems, which means an upgrade touches OpenMRS, OpenELIS, Odoo and the imaging stack together, and hospitals with heavy customisation often freeze on an old version rather than risk it.
- Skilled Bahmni implementers are concentrated in a small number of firms in India and a few African countries, so a hospital outside those markets may find nobody local who can support it.
- Funding for the coalition and its shared engineering comes from donors and member contributions rather than licence revenue, which makes the pace of core development dependent on grant cycles rather than on customer demand.
Pricing, plan by plan
Aidoc
On request- Aidoc$undefined/year
- Annual subscription priced by algorithm and by study volume
- aiOS platform integration licensed separately from individual algorithms
- Multi algorithm bundles negotiated for enterprise deployments
Bahmni
Free- BahmniFree
- AGPL open source, no licence fee
- All modules included
- Community support via forum and documentation
Which should you pick?
Choose Aidoc if
- You need triage and notification.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want intracranial haemorrhage.
Choose Bahmni if
- You need openmrs clinical record.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux, Android.
- You also want configurable clinical forms.
Questions people ask
- Is Aidoc or Bahmni better?
- Neither clearly leads. Aidoc starts at On request and Bahmni at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Aidoc or Bahmni?
- Bahmni has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Aidoc and Free for Bahmni.
- Does Aidoc or Bahmni run on more platforms?
- Aidoc runs on Web, iOS, Android. Bahmni runs on Web, Linux, Android.
- Can I use Bahmni for free?
- Yes. Bahmni has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Aidoc starts at On request.
- What is Aidoc best used for?
- Aidoc is most often used for a regional stroke centre that wants large vessel occlusion flagged and the neurointervention team notified before the radiologist dictates, a trauma centre wanting cervical spine fracture and intra abdominal free gas prioritised in an overnight queue read by one on call radiologist, an oncology imaging programme that wants incidental pulmonary embolism caught on staging cts ordered for a different question, a health system that has bought ai from several vendors and wants one pacs integration through aios rather than one integration per algorithm. Of those, a regional stroke centre that wants large vessel occlusion flagged and the neurointervention team notified before the radiologist dictates and a trauma centre wanting cervical spine fracture and intra abdominal free gas prioritised in an overnight queue read by one on call radiologist are not what Bahmni is typically brought in for.
- What can Aidoc do that Bahmni cannot?
- Aidoc covers Triage and notification, Intracranial haemorrhage, Pulmonary embolism, Large vessel occlusion. Bahmni covers OpenMRS clinical record, Configurable clinical forms, Laboratory integration, Billing and inventory.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Aidoc: Is Aidoc FDA cleared?
Yes, it holds multiple 510(k) clearances, but they are for computer aided triage and notification. It may prioritise a worklist and notify a team. It may not provide a diagnostic interpretation or replace a radiologist read.
Bahmni: Is Bahmni free?
The software is, under an open source licence. Implementation, hosting, configuration, training and support are charged by whichever partner you engage.
Aidoc: Does it reduce radiologist workload?
No. Every study still needs a full read. The benefit is in the order studies are read and how quickly a receiving specialty is activated, not in reading fewer studies.
Bahmni: Who owns and governs Bahmni?
Thoughtworks transferred ownership in October 2017 to the Bahmni Coalition, under the fiscal sponsorship of the non-profit OpenMRS Inc. Thoughtworks remains on the governing committee.
Aidoc: Can I run other vendors AI through it?
Yes, that is what the aiOS platform layer is for, and for health systems with several AI vendors it is often the main reason to buy Aidoc at all.
Bahmni: What does an implementation actually cost?
It varies by hospital size and country, but expect the dominant costs to be partner services, training and multi-year support rather than software or hardware. Get a fixed-scope quote covering upgrades, not just go-live.
Aidoc: Is pricing published?
No. It is quoted per algorithm and by annual study volume, and enterprise bundles are negotiated case by case.
Bahmni: Is it a recognised Digital Public Good?
Yes, Bahmni is on the Digital Public Goods Alliance register, which is increasingly a condition of donor funding for health information systems.
Bahmni: Where is it used?
More than 500 implementations across roughly 50 countries, concentrated in South Asia and Africa.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Aidoc vs Therapixel
- Aidoc vs Lunit
- Aidoc vs Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- Aidoc vs Annalise.ai
- Aidoc vs PathAI
- Aidoc vs Ambra Health
- Aidoc vs Paige
- Aidoc vs Figure 1
- Aidoc vs UpToDate
- Aidoc vs Visage Imaging
- Aidoc vs Meru Health
- Aidoc vs Sectra
- Aidoc vs Cerner PowerWorks
- Aidoc vs ChiroTouch
- Aidoc vs Doctolib
- Aidoc vs Doximity
- Aidoc vs eClinicalWorks
- Aidoc vs eClinicalWorks Prime
- Aidoc vs OpenMRS
- Aidoc vs DHIS2
- Aidoc vs GNU Health
- Aidoc vs OpenClinica
- Aidoc vs Open Dental
- Aidoc vs Clue
- Aidoc vs Meditech
- Aidoc vs Medscape
- Aidoc vs Cerner
- Aidoc vs PioneerRx
- Aidoc vs Rad AI
- Aidoc vs Rx30
- Bahmni vs Therapixel
- Bahmni vs Lunit
- Bahmni vs Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- Bahmni vs Annalise.ai
- Bahmni vs PathAI
- Bahmni vs Ambra Health
- Bahmni vs Paige
- Bahmni vs Figure 1
- Bahmni vs UpToDate
- Bahmni vs Visage Imaging
- Bahmni vs Meru Health
- Bahmni vs Sectra
- Bahmni vs Cerner PowerWorks
- Bahmni vs ChiroTouch
- Bahmni vs Doctolib
- Bahmni vs Doximity
- Bahmni vs eClinicalWorks
- Bahmni vs eClinicalWorks Prime
- Bahmni vs OpenMRS
- Bahmni vs DHIS2
- Bahmni vs GNU Health
- Bahmni vs OpenClinica
- Bahmni vs Open Dental
- Bahmni vs Clue
- Bahmni vs Meditech
- Bahmni vs Medscape
- Bahmni vs Cerner
- Bahmni vs PioneerRx
- Bahmni vs Rad AI
- Bahmni vs Rx30
