Logging · head to head
Azure Monitor vs Dynatrace Logs
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Azure Monitor billed per GB ingested across three separate log plans, Auxiliary, Basic and Analytics, so the plan chosen changes the rate as much as the volume does; Dynatrace Logs log ingest and processing is billed at $0.20 per GiB, separately from retention and from query
- They diverge on capability: Azure Monitor covers Log collection, Dynatrace Logs covers Log analysis.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Azure Monitor and Dynatrace Logs actually diverge.
| Attribute | Azure Monitor | Dynatrace Logs |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | usage-based | subscription |
| Founded | 2010 | 2005 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), platforms (Web, Api), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Logging).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Azure Monitor
- Log collection
- Metrics collection
- Alerts and notifications
- Custom dashboards
Only in Dynatrace Logs
- Log analysis
- AI-powered insights
- Metrics integration
- Automated root cause
Both cover
- API
- Webhooks
- REST
- Web support
- Api support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Azure Monitor
- Collecting logs and metrics from Azure resourcesnot Dynatrace Logs
- Alerting on metric thresholds and log queriesnot Dynatrace Logs
- Application performance monitoring through Application Insightsnot Dynatrace Logs
- Long-term log retention for compliancenot Dynatrace Logs
- Querying operational data with KQLnot Dynatrace Logs
Dynatrace Logs
- Ingesting and processing application and infrastructure logsnot Azure Monitor
- Querying logs alongside traces and metrics in one platformnot Azure Monitor
- Log driven alerting within an existing Dynatrace deploymentnot Azure Monitor
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Azure Monitor
- Billed per GB ingested across three separate log plans, Auxiliary, Basic and Analytics, so the plan chosen changes the rate as much as the volume does
- Only the first 5 GB a month of Analytics logs is free per billing account
- Retention beyond the base period is charged per GB per month, up to 2 years interactive and 12 years long term
- Log queries and search jobs are billed per GB scanned, so investigating an incident costs money
- Alert rules are billed per time series for metrics and by execution frequency for logs
- The pricing page shows placeholders rather than rates until a region and currency are chosen
Dynatrace Logs
- Log ingest and processing is billed at $0.20 per GiB, separately from retention and from query
- Querying logs is charged in addition to ingest, either pay per query or as bundled queries
- Log analytics requires the same annual platform commitment as the rest of the Dynatrace platform
Pricing, plan by plan
Azure Monitor
Free- FreeFree
- Log collection
- Metrics collection
- Alerts and notifications
Dynatrace Logs
Free- FreeFree
- Log analysis
- AI-powered insights
- Metrics integration
Which should you pick?
Choose Azure Monitor if
- You need log collection.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want metrics collection.
Choose Dynatrace Logs if
- You need log analysis.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want ai-powered insights.
Questions people ask
- Is Azure Monitor or Dynatrace Logs better?
- Neither clearly leads. Azure Monitor starts at Free and Dynatrace Logs at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Azure Monitor or Dynatrace Logs?
- Azure Monitor starts at Free and Dynatrace Logs at Free.
- Does Azure Monitor or Dynatrace Logs run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, Api, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Azure Monitor for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Azure Monitor best used for?
- Azure Monitor is most often used for collecting logs and metrics from azure resources, alerting on metric thresholds and log queries, application performance monitoring through application insights, long-term log retention for compliance. Of those, collecting logs and metrics from azure resources and alerting on metric thresholds and log queries are not what Dynatrace Logs is typically brought in for.
- What can Azure Monitor do that Dynatrace Logs cannot?
- Azure Monitor covers Log collection, Metrics collection, Alerts and notifications, Custom dashboards. Dynatrace Logs covers Log analysis, AI-powered insights, Metrics integration, Automated root cause. Both handle API, Webhooks, REST, Web support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Azure Monitor: How does Azure Monitor billing work?
Billing is based on data volume ingested into Azure Monitor. Additional charges apply separately for alerts, notifications, web tests, and data export. Activity log and platform metrics are automatically collected with an Azure subscription.
SourceAzure Monitor: What savings are available with Azure Monitor?
Capacity reservations offer up to 36% savings compared to standard pay-as-you-go pricing when you commit to reserved capacity upfront.
SourceAzure Monitor: Is there a free tier for Azure Monitor?
No dedicated free tier exists. Activity log and platform metrics are automatically collected with an Azure subscription, but detailed monitoring requires additional configuration and associated costs.
SourceRelated pages
More on Azure Monitor
More on Dynatrace Logs
Other head to heads
- Azure Monitor vs Elastic Stack
- Azure Monitor vs New Relic
- Azure Monitor vs Datadog Logs
- Azure Monitor vs Coralogix
- Azure Monitor vs Cronitor
- Azure Monitor vs Dynatrace
- Azure Monitor vs Airbrake
- Azure Monitor vs AppDynamics
- Azure Monitor vs Honeybadger
- Azure Monitor vs Raygun
- Azure Monitor vs Retrace
- Azure Monitor vs Rollbar
- Azure Monitor vs Sematext
- Azure Monitor vs Splunk Cloud
- Azure Monitor vs Stackdriver
- Azure Monitor vs Elastic APM
- Azure Monitor vs Splunk Enterprise
- Azure Monitor vs Axiom
- Azure Monitor vs Loggly
- Azure Monitor vs Logz.io
- Azure Monitor vs Sumo Logic
- Azure Monitor vs FireHydrant
- Azure Monitor vs Rootly
- Azure Monitor vs Fluent Bit
- Azure Monitor vs New Relic Logs
- Azure Monitor vs Fluentd
- Azure Monitor vs Elasticsearch Service
- Azure Monitor vs ELK Stack
- Azure Monitor vs Filebeat
- Dynatrace Logs vs Elastic Stack
- Dynatrace Logs vs New Relic
- Dynatrace Logs vs Datadog Logs
- Dynatrace Logs vs Coralogix
- Dynatrace Logs vs Cronitor
- Dynatrace Logs vs Dynatrace
- Dynatrace Logs vs Airbrake
- Dynatrace Logs vs AppDynamics
- Dynatrace Logs vs Honeybadger
- Dynatrace Logs vs Raygun
- Dynatrace Logs vs Retrace
- Dynatrace Logs vs Rollbar
- Dynatrace Logs vs Sematext
- Dynatrace Logs vs Splunk Cloud
- Dynatrace Logs vs Stackdriver
- Dynatrace Logs vs Elastic APM
- Dynatrace Logs vs Splunk Enterprise
- Dynatrace Logs vs Axiom
- Dynatrace Logs vs Loggly
- Dynatrace Logs vs Logz.io
- Dynatrace Logs vs Sumo Logic
- Dynatrace Logs vs FireHydrant
- Dynatrace Logs vs Rootly
- Dynatrace Logs vs Fluent Bit
- Dynatrace Logs vs New Relic Logs
- Dynatrace Logs vs Fluentd
- Dynatrace Logs vs Elasticsearch Service
- Dynatrace Logs vs ELK Stack
- Dynatrace Logs vs Filebeat


