Software · head to head
Azure Monitor vs Elastic Stack
Elastic Stack
Software
Search, Observability, and Security Solutions
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Azure Monitor has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Azure Monitor billed per GB ingested across three separate log plans, Auxiliary, Basic and Analytics, so the plan chosen changes the rate as much as the volume does; Elastic Stack self-managed deployment requires licensing based on node count and RAM usage
- They diverge on capability: Azure Monitor covers Log collection, Elastic Stack covers Full-text search.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Azure Monitor and Elastic Stack actually diverge.
| Attribute | Azure Monitor | Elastic Stack |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | usage-based | subscription |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web, Api | Cloud-hosted, Self-managed, Docker, Kubernetes (ECK) |
| Founded | 2010 | 2011 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Azure Monitor
- Log collection
- Metrics collection
- Alerts and notifications
- Custom dashboards
Only in Elastic Stack
- Full-text search
- Log analytics
- Security monitoring
- Alerting
Both cover
- API
- Webhooks
- REST
- Web support
- Api support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Azure Monitor
- Collecting logs and metrics from Azure resourcesnot Elastic Stack
- Alerting on metric thresholds and log queriesnot Elastic Stack
- Application performance monitoring through Application Insightsnot Elastic Stack
- Long-term log retention for compliancenot Elastic Stack
- Querying operational data with KQLnot Elastic Stack
Elastic Stack
- Distributed search and analytics engine for production-scale workloadsnot Azure Monitor
- Full-text search and vector search with approximate nearest neighbour supportnot Azure Monitor
- Security event tracking with field-level and document-level access controlnot Azure Monitor
- Machine learning capabilities including anomaly detection and forecastingnot Azure Monitor
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Azure Monitor
- Billed per GB ingested across three separate log plans, Auxiliary, Basic and Analytics, so the plan chosen changes the rate as much as the volume does
- Only the first 5 GB a month of Analytics logs is free per billing account
- Retention beyond the base period is charged per GB per month, up to 2 years interactive and 12 years long term
- Log queries and search jobs are billed per GB scanned, so investigating an incident costs money
- Alert rules are billed per time series for metrics and by execution frequency for logs
- The pricing page shows placeholders rather than rates until a region and currency are chosen
Elastic Stack
- Self-managed deployment requires licensing based on node count and RAM usage
- Serverless option has pending features including traffic filtering and bring-your-own-key encryption
- Hosted deployment requires custom resource configuration for cluster management
- Pricing models differ significantly across Hosted, Serverless, and Self-managed options
Pricing, plan by plan
Azure Monitor
Free- FreeFree
- Log collection
- Metrics collection
- Alerts and notifications
Elastic Stack
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Elastic Stack review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Azure Monitor if
- You need log collection.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want metrics collection.
Choose Elastic Stack if
- You need full-text search.
- You work on Cloud-hosted, Self-managed, Docker, Kubernetes (ECK).
- You also want log analytics.
Questions people ask
- Is Azure Monitor or Elastic Stack better?
- Neither clearly leads. Azure Monitor starts at Free and Elastic Stack at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Azure Monitor or Elastic Stack?
- Azure Monitor has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Azure Monitor and On request for Elastic Stack.
- Does Azure Monitor or Elastic Stack run on more platforms?
- Azure Monitor runs on Web, Api. Elastic Stack runs on Cloud-hosted, Self-managed, Docker, Kubernetes (ECK).
- Can I use Azure Monitor for free?
- Yes. Azure Monitor has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Elastic Stack starts at On request.
- What is Azure Monitor best used for?
- Azure Monitor is most often used for collecting logs and metrics from azure resources, alerting on metric thresholds and log queries, application performance monitoring through application insights, long-term log retention for compliance. Of those, collecting logs and metrics from azure resources and alerting on metric thresholds and log queries are not what Elastic Stack is typically brought in for.
- What can Azure Monitor do that Elastic Stack cannot?
- Azure Monitor covers Log collection, Metrics collection, Alerts and notifications, Custom dashboards. Elastic Stack covers Full-text search, Log analytics, Security monitoring, Alerting. Both handle API, Webhooks, REST, Web support.