Log Management · head to head
Azure Monitor vs Rollbar
Azure Monitor
Log Management
Azure's Monitoring and Diagnostics Service
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Azure Monitor billed per GB ingested across three separate log plans, Auxiliary, Basic and Analytics, so the plan chosen changes the rate as much as the volume does; Rollbar the free plan allows 5,000 occurrences a month with 30 day retention
- They diverge on capability: Azure Monitor covers Log collection, Rollbar covers Error tracking.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Azure Monitor and Rollbar actually diverge.
| Attribute | Azure Monitor | Rollbar |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2010 | 2012 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (usage-based), free tier (Yes), platforms (Web, Api), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Log Management).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Azure Monitor
- Log collection
- Metrics collection
- Alerts and notifications
- Custom dashboards
Only in Rollbar
- Error tracking
- Real-time alerts
- Error grouping
- Source maps
Both cover
- API
- Webhooks
- REST
- Web support
- Api support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Azure Monitor
- Collecting logs and metrics from Azure resourcesnot Rollbar
- Alerting on metric thresholds and log queriesnot Rollbar
- Application performance monitoring through Application Insightsnot Rollbar
- Long-term log retention for compliancenot Rollbar
- Querying operational data with KQLnot Rollbar
Rollbar
- Tracking application errors and exceptions across deploymentsnot Azure Monitor
- Grouping and alerting on production error occurrencesnot Azure Monitor
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Azure Monitor
- Billed per GB ingested across three separate log plans, Auxiliary, Basic and Analytics, so the plan chosen changes the rate as much as the volume does
- Only the first 5 GB a month of Analytics logs is free per billing account
- Retention beyond the base period is charged per GB per month, up to 2 years interactive and 12 years long term
- Log queries and search jobs are billed per GB scanned, so investigating an incident costs money
- Alert rules are billed per time series for metrics and by execution frequency for logs
- The pricing page shows placeholders rather than rates until a region and currency are chosen
Rollbar
- The free plan allows 5,000 occurrences a month with 30 day retention
- Retention is a paid ladder rather than a setting, at up to 90 days on Essentials and up to 180 on Advanced
- Advanced alerting, the RQL analytics query language and SCIM provisioning are excluded from the free plan
- Enterprise requires a $4M annual plan minimum
- No price is published for Essentials or Advanced, so only the free tier has a visible cost
Pricing, plan by plan
Azure Monitor
Free- FreeFree
- Log collection
- Metrics collection
- Alerts and notifications
Rollbar
Free- FreeFree
- Error tracking
- Real-time alerts
- Error grouping
Which should you pick?
Choose Azure Monitor if
- You need log collection.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want metrics collection.
Choose Rollbar if
- You need error tracking.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want real-time alerts.
Questions people ask
- Is Azure Monitor or Rollbar better?
- Neither clearly leads. Azure Monitor starts at Free and Rollbar at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Azure Monitor or Rollbar?
- Azure Monitor starts at Free and Rollbar at Free.
- Does Azure Monitor or Rollbar run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, Api, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Azure Monitor for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Azure Monitor best used for?
- Azure Monitor is most often used for collecting logs and metrics from azure resources, alerting on metric thresholds and log queries, application performance monitoring through application insights, long-term log retention for compliance. Of those, collecting logs and metrics from azure resources and alerting on metric thresholds and log queries are not what Rollbar is typically brought in for.
- What can Azure Monitor do that Rollbar cannot?
- Azure Monitor covers Log collection, Metrics collection, Alerts and notifications, Custom dashboards. Rollbar covers Error tracking, Real-time alerts, Error grouping, Source maps. Both handle API, Webhooks, REST, Web support.
Related pages
More on Azure Monitor
Other head to heads
- Azure Monitor vs Elastic Stack
- Azure Monitor vs New Relic
- Azure Monitor vs Datadog Logs
- Azure Monitor vs Coralogix
- Azure Monitor vs Grafana Loki
- Azure Monitor vs CloudWatch
- Azure Monitor vs Dynatrace
- Azure Monitor vs InfluxDB
- Azure Monitor vs Airbrake
- Azure Monitor vs AppDynamics
- Azure Monitor vs Axiom
- Azure Monitor vs Better Stack
- Azure Monitor vs Bugsnag
- Azure Monitor vs Dynatrace Logs
- Azure Monitor vs Elastic
- Azure Monitor vs Elastic APM
- Azure Monitor vs Elasticsearch Service
- Azure Monitor vs ELK Stack
- Rollbar vs Elastic Stack
- Rollbar vs New Relic
- Rollbar vs Datadog Logs
- Rollbar vs Coralogix
- Rollbar vs Grafana Loki
- Rollbar vs CloudWatch
- Rollbar vs Dynatrace
- Rollbar vs InfluxDB
- Rollbar vs Airbrake
- Rollbar vs AppDynamics
- Rollbar vs Axiom
- Rollbar vs Better Stack
- Rollbar vs Bugsnag
- Rollbar vs Dynatrace Logs
- Rollbar vs Elastic
- Rollbar vs Elastic APM
- Rollbar vs Elasticsearch Service
- Rollbar vs ELK Stack

