Cybersecurity · head to head
Authelia vs Helix

Authelia
Cybersecurity
Open-source authentication and two-factor portal for reverse proxies
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Helix
Developer Tools
Post-modern modal text editor for the terminal, written in Rust
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Authelia depends on a reverse proxy: it is not a standalone identity provider; Helix no official GUI application yet, so it requires comfort with terminal workflows.
- They diverge on capability: Authelia covers Reverse proxy integration, Helix covers Multiple Selections.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Authelia and Helix actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Authelia
- Reverse proxy integration
- Two-factor authentication
- Access control rules
- Lightweight backends
Only in Helix
- Multiple Selections
- Tree-sitter Syntax Trees
- Built-in LSP Support
- Fuzzy File Finder
- Project-wide Search
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Authelia
- Putting a login and 2FA in front of self-hosted services that have nonenot Helix
- Adding SSO across a small set of internal tools without a full identity platformnot Helix
- Home and small-team infrastructure behind a single reverse proxynot Helix
Helix
- Editing code over SSH or in tmux sessionsnot Authelia
- Working with syntax-aware selection and navigationnot Authelia
- Getting IDE-like completion and diagnostics without plugin setupnot Authelia
- Lightweight, low-resource code editing on laptopsnot Authelia
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Authelia
- Depends on a reverse proxy: it is not a standalone identity provider
- Configuration is YAML-first with no administrative interface, so changes mean editing files
- Not a full IAM: user management, provisioning and federation are limited compared with Keycloak
- Scales poorly as an organisation-wide identity solution, which is not its target
Helix
- No official GUI application yet, so it requires comfort with terminal workflows.
- Plugin ecosystem is far smaller than Vim's or Neovim's, limiting customization.
- Keybindings differ from both Vim and Kakoune, adding a learning curve for users of either.
- Configuration is more limited than Neovim's Lua-based extensibility.
Pricing, plan by plan
Authelia
Free- AutheliaFree
- Full functionality
- No usage limits
- Community support
Helix
Free- FreeFree
- Full editor, no paid tiers
Which should you pick?
Choose Authelia if
- You need reverse proxy integration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted.
- You also want two-factor authentication.
Choose Helix if
- You need multiple selections.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on linux, mac, windows.
- You also want tree-sitter syntax trees.
Questions people ask
- Is Authelia or Helix better?
- Neither clearly leads. Authelia starts at Free and Helix at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Authelia or Helix?
- Authelia starts at Free and Helix at Free.
- Does Authelia or Helix run on more platforms?
- Authelia runs on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted. Helix runs on linux, mac, windows.
- Can I use Authelia for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Authelia best used for?
- Authelia is most often used for putting a login and 2fa in front of self-hosted services that have none, adding sso across a small set of internal tools without a full identity platform, home and small-team infrastructure behind a single reverse proxy. Of those, putting a login and 2fa in front of self-hosted services that have none and adding sso across a small set of internal tools without a full identity platform are not what Helix is typically brought in for.
- What can Authelia do that Helix cannot?
- Authelia covers Reverse proxy integration, Two-factor authentication, Access control rules, Lightweight backends. Helix covers Multiple Selections, Tree-sitter Syntax Trees, Built-in LSP Support, Fuzzy File Finder.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Authelia: Is Authelia free?
Yes, open source with no licence fee.
Helix: Is Helix free to use?
Yes, Helix is free and open source, licensed under the Mozilla Public License 2.0 (MPL-2.0), with no paid tiers or subscriptions.
SourceAuthelia: Does Authelia need a reverse proxy?
Yes. It integrates through forward authentication with Nginx, Traefik, Caddy or HAProxy rather than sitting in front of traffic itself.
Helix: How do I install Helix?
Install via your operating system's package manager, or download pre-built binaries from GitHub Releases; the nightly version requires building from source.
SourceAuthelia: Authelia or Keycloak?
Authelia is far lighter and aimed at protecting self-hosted services behind a proxy. Keycloak is a full identity and access management platform, and much more to run.
Helix: Does Helix support plugins?
Not yet. Helix currently has no plugin system, though the project intends to add one eventually; it instead ships with built-in LSP and tree-sitter support out of the box.
SourceHelix: How do I configure Helix?
Helix ships with sane modern defaults requiring much less config-file fiddling than Vim, though settings can still be customized in a config.toml file.
SourceHelix: Where can I get help or support?
Support is community-driven via GitHub for code and issues, the Matrix chat for discussion, and OpenCollective for funding ongoing development.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Authelia vs authentik
- Authelia vs Logto
- Authelia vs Ory Kratos
- Authelia vs Frontegg
- Authelia vs Infisical
- Authelia vs Bitwarden
- Authelia vs Semgrep
- Authelia vs Trivy
- Authelia vs Chainguard
- Authelia vs Passbolt
- Authelia vs 1Password
- Authelia vs Signicat
- Authelia vs Silent Eight
- Authelia vs Socket
- Authelia vs Socure
- Authelia vs SonicWall
- Authelia vs Sophos Intercept X
- Authelia vs Ory
- Authelia vs GNU Emacs
- Authelia vs Notepad++
- Authelia vs Frappe
- Authelia vs Restate
- Authelia vs Visual Studio Code
- Authelia vs Penpot
- Authelia vs Rust
- Authelia vs Ansible
- Authelia vs Bazel
- Authelia vs Eclipse IDE
- Authelia vs Pants Build
- Authelia vs Swagger UI
- Authelia vs Tilt
- Authelia vs WarpBuild
- Authelia vs Webpack
- Authelia vs Avo
- Authelia vs Azure DevOps
- Authelia vs Backstage
- Helix vs authentik
- Helix vs Logto
- Helix vs Ory Kratos
- Helix vs Frontegg
- Helix vs Infisical
- Helix vs Bitwarden
- Helix vs Semgrep
- Helix vs Trivy
- Helix vs Chainguard
- Helix vs Passbolt
- Helix vs 1Password
- Helix vs Signicat
- Helix vs Silent Eight
- Helix vs Socket
- Helix vs Socure
- Helix vs SonicWall
- Helix vs Sophos Intercept X
- Helix vs Ory
- Helix vs GNU Emacs
- Helix vs Notepad++
- Helix vs Frappe
- Helix vs Restate
- Helix vs Visual Studio Code
- Helix vs Penpot
- Helix vs Rust
- Helix vs Ansible
- Helix vs Bazel
- Helix vs Eclipse IDE
- Helix vs Pants Build
- Helix vs Swagger UI
- Helix vs Tilt
- Helix vs WarpBuild
- Helix vs Webpack
- Helix vs Avo
- Helix vs Azure DevOps
- Helix vs Backstage
