Softwr

Cybersecurity · head to head

authentik vs Euna Solutions

authentik logo

authentik

Cybersecurity

Open-source identity provider with flexible authentication flows

From
Free
Free plan
Yes
Euna Solutions logo

Euna Solutions

Government

Budgeting, procurement, grants and payments software for the public sector, formerly GTY Technology

From
On request
Free plan
No

The short version

  • Only authentik has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
  • Each has a real cost: authentik smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides; Euna Solutions the suite is assembled from six or more separate acquisitions and integration between modules is still being completed, so a buyer purchasing two modules should ask precisely what data passes between them today rather than on the roadmap.
  • They diverge on capability: authentik covers Configurable flows, Euna Solutions covers Euna Budget.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which authentik and Euna Solutions actually diverge.

Attributes where authentik and Euna Solutions differ
AttributeauthentikEuna Solutions
Starting priceFreeOn request
Pricing modelOpen-source core with a paid enterprise tierquote
Free tierYesNo
PlatformsDocker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hostedWeb
CategoryCybersecurityGovernment

Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in authentik

  • Configurable flows
  • Protocol support
  • Application proxy
  • Modern admin interface

Only in Euna Solutions

  • Euna Budget
  • Euna Procurement
  • Euna Grants
  • Euna Payments
  • Euna Special Education
  • Transparency portals
  • Workflow automation

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

authentik

  • Self-hosted SSO across internal services without commercial identity pricingnot Euna Solutions
  • Putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxynot Euna Solutions
  • Teams who tried Keycloak and wanted something less heavynot Euna Solutions

Euna Solutions

  • A county administering federal grant funds that must produce subrecipient monitoring and reporting an auditor will acceptnot authentik
  • A city whose budget process runs on a chain of spreadsheets that nobody can reconcile before the council meetingnot authentik
  • A school district needing sealed electronic bidding with scored evaluation and an audit trailnot authentik
  • A jurisdiction wanting a public transparency portal for budget and spending without building onenot authentik

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

authentik

  • Smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides
  • The flow model is flexible but conceptually unfamiliar, and simple setups can feel over-abstracted
  • Enterprise support and some governance features sit behind the paid tier
  • Self-hosted identity is still yours to secure, patch and keep available

Euna Solutions

  • The suite is assembled from six or more separate acquisitions and integration between modules is still being completed, so a buyer purchasing two modules should ask precisely what data passes between them today rather than on the roadmap.
  • No pricing is published at any level and terms are typically multi-year, so budgeting the true cost requires obtaining peer jurisdiction contracts, which is possible but slow.
  • Individual modules face specialists with deeper functionality, so a jurisdiction buying only procurement or only budgeting may get less capability than from a single-product vendor at similar cost.
  • Ownership has changed twice in six years, from a SPAC to private equity, and further change is plausible, which creates roadmap uncertainty over the length of a typical multi-year public sector contract.
  • Grant management depth is oriented to United States federal and state programmes, which makes the product close to useless to public bodies outside that funding system.

Pricing, plan by plan

authentik

Free
  • Open sourceFree
    • Full identity provider
    • All protocols
    • Community support

Euna Solutions

On request
  • Euna Solutions$undefined/year
    • Modules licensed individually: Budget, Procurement, Grants, Payments
    • Priced by jurisdiction size, modules and users
    • Annual subscription with multi-year terms common

Which should you pick?

Choose authentik if

  • You need configurable flows.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted.
  • You also want protocol support.

Choose Euna Solutions if

  • You need euna budget.
  • You also want euna procurement.

Questions people ask

Is authentik or Euna Solutions better?
Neither clearly leads. authentik starts at Free and Euna Solutions at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, authentik or Euna Solutions?
authentik has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for authentik and On request for Euna Solutions.
Does authentik or Euna Solutions run on more platforms?
authentik runs on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted. Euna Solutions runs on Web.
Can I use authentik for free?
Yes. authentik has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Euna Solutions starts at On request.
What is authentik best used for?
authentik is most often used for self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing, putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy, teams who tried keycloak and wanted something less heavy. Of those, self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing and putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy are not what Euna Solutions is typically brought in for.
What can authentik do that Euna Solutions cannot?
authentik covers Configurable flows, Protocol support, Application proxy, Modern admin interface. Euna Solutions covers Euna Budget, Euna Procurement, Euna Grants, Euna Payments.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

authentik: Is authentik free?

The open-source edition is free and complete for most use. An enterprise tier adds support and additional features.

Euna Solutions: Is this the same company as GTY Technology?

Yes. GTY Technology rebranded to Euna Solutions in 2023. The individual products came from acquisitions including Bonfire, Questica, eCivis and CityBase.

authentik: authentik or Keycloak?

authentik is generally reported as easier to run and administer; Keycloak is more established with a larger community and Red Hat behind it.

Euna Solutions: Which product was Bonfire?

Bonfire is now Euna Procurement. Questica became Euna Budget and eCivis became Euna Grants. Ask which underlying codebase a demo is showing.

authentik: Can authentik protect apps with no login of their own?

Yes. Its application proxy places authentication in front of services that have no built-in authentication.

Euna Solutions: What does it cost?

Not published. Modules are quoted individually by jurisdiction size and users, usually on multi-year terms and often available through cooperative purchasing contracts.

Euna Solutions: Do the modules actually share data?

Partially, and it varies by pair. Get the specific integration between the modules you are buying demonstrated on real data before signing.

Share

Related pages

Other head to heads