Cybersecurity · head to head
Authelia vs Datadog

Authelia
Cybersecurity
Open-source authentication and two-factor portal for reverse proxies
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Authelia has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Authelia depends on a reverse proxy: it is not a standalone identity provider; Datadog consumption-based pricing model makes costs hard to predict and can scale quickly
- They diverge on capability: Authelia covers Reverse proxy integration, Datadog covers Infrastructure monitoring.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Authelia and Datadog actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Authelia
- Reverse proxy integration
- Two-factor authentication
- Access control rules
- Lightweight backends
Only in Datadog
- Infrastructure monitoring
- Application performance monitoring
- Log management
- Real user monitoring
- Synthetic monitoring
- Security monitoring
- Network monitoring
- Serverless monitoring
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Authelia
- Putting a login and 2FA in front of self-hosted services that have nonenot Datadog
- Adding SSO across a small set of internal tools without a full identity platformnot Datadog
- Home and small-team infrastructure behind a single reverse proxynot Datadog
Datadog
- Infrastructure monitoringnot Authelia
- Application performancenot Authelia
- Security monitoringnot Authelia
- Log analysisnot Authelia
- Cloud monitoringnot Authelia
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Authelia
- Depends on a reverse proxy: it is not a standalone identity provider
- Configuration is YAML-first with no administrative interface, so changes mean editing files
- Not a full IAM: user management, provisioning and federation are limited compared with Keycloak
- Scales poorly as an organisation-wide identity solution, which is not its target
Datadog
- Consumption-based pricing model makes costs hard to predict and can scale quickly
- Add-on modules significantly increase costs: custom metrics, indexed spans, extended retention
- No free tier for production monitoring
- High costs for organizations with large amounts of log data or high-cardinality metrics
Pricing, plan by plan
Authelia
Free- AutheliaFree
- Full functionality
- No usage limits
- Community support
Datadog
$15/month- Infrastructure Monitoring$15/month
- Host monitoring
- Basic dashboards
- APM$31/month
- Application performance monitoring
- Trace collection
- Log Management$0.1/gb
- Log indexing
- Search and filter
Which should you pick?
Choose Authelia if
- You need reverse proxy integration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted.
- You also want two-factor authentication.
Choose Datadog if
- You need infrastructure monitoring.
- You work on Web, Linux, Windows, macOS.
- You also want application performance monitoring.
Questions people ask
- Is Authelia or Datadog better?
- Neither clearly leads. Authelia starts at Free and Datadog at $15/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Authelia or Datadog?
- Authelia has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Authelia and $15/month for Datadog.
- Does Authelia or Datadog run on more platforms?
- Authelia runs on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted. Datadog runs on Web, Linux, Windows, macOS.
- Can I use Authelia for free?
- Yes. Authelia has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Datadog starts at $15/month.
- What is Authelia best used for?
- Authelia is most often used for putting a login and 2fa in front of self-hosted services that have none, adding sso across a small set of internal tools without a full identity platform, home and small-team infrastructure behind a single reverse proxy. Of those, putting a login and 2fa in front of self-hosted services that have none and adding sso across a small set of internal tools without a full identity platform are not what Datadog is typically brought in for.
- What can Authelia do that Datadog cannot?
- Authelia covers Reverse proxy integration, Two-factor authentication, Access control rules, Lightweight backends. Datadog covers Infrastructure monitoring, Application performance monitoring, Log management, Real user monitoring.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Authelia: Is Authelia free?
Yes, open source with no licence fee.
Datadog: How is Datadog pricing structured?
Datadog uses consumption-based pricing tied to data volume ingested, hosts monitored, and products enabled. Infrastructure Monitoring starts at $15/host/month, APM at $31/host/month, and Log Management at $0.10/GB for indexed logs.
SourceAuthelia: Does Authelia need a reverse proxy?
Yes. It integrates through forward authentication with Nginx, Traefik, Caddy or HAProxy rather than sitting in front of traffic itself.
Datadog: Does Datadog offer a free tier?
Datadog offers a free trial but not a permanent free tier for production monitoring. Pricing begins with paid plans only.
SourceAuthelia: Authelia or Keycloak?
Authelia is far lighter and aimed at protecting self-hosted services behind a proxy. Keycloak is a full identity and access management platform, and much more to run.
Datadog: What integrations does Datadog support?
Datadog offers 1000+ built-in integrations including AWS, Kubernetes, Docker, Azure, GCP, and most major cloud platforms and services.
SourceDatadog: Can Datadog monitor Kubernetes clusters?
Yes. The Datadog Agent runs as a DaemonSet to provide real-time visibility into pods, nodes, deployments, and control-plane health across major Kubernetes distributions including EKS, AKS, GKE, OpenShift, and others.
SourceDatadog: How can I reduce Datadog costs?
Datadog bills based on indexed logs, custom metrics, and high-cardinality tags. Costs can be unpredictable and may run 2-3x estimates. Prepaying annually can secure 5-15% discounts.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Authelia vs authentik
- Authelia vs Logto
- Authelia vs Ory Kratos
- Authelia vs Frontegg
- Authelia vs Infisical
- Authelia vs Bitwarden
- Authelia vs Semgrep
- Authelia vs Trivy
- Authelia vs Chainguard
- Authelia vs Passbolt
- Authelia vs 1Password
- Authelia vs Signicat
- Authelia vs Silent Eight
- Authelia vs Socket
- Authelia vs Socure
- Authelia vs SonicWall
- Authelia vs Sophos Intercept X
- Authelia vs Ory
- Authelia vs Sentry
- Authelia vs PagerDuty
- Authelia vs Dashlane
- Authelia vs LogRocket
- Authelia vs Okta
- Authelia vs Auth0
- Authelia vs Segment
- Authelia vs GitLab
- Authelia vs Coda
- Authelia vs ClickUp
- Authelia vs Linear
- Authelia vs Docker
- Authelia vs Jenkins
- Authelia vs Miro
- Authelia vs Personetics
- Authelia vs Plane
- Authelia vs Postman
- Authelia vs Raycast
- Datadog vs authentik
- Datadog vs Logto
- Datadog vs Ory Kratos
- Datadog vs Frontegg
- Datadog vs Infisical
- Datadog vs Bitwarden
- Datadog vs Semgrep
- Datadog vs Trivy
- Datadog vs Chainguard
- Datadog vs Passbolt
- Datadog vs 1Password
- Datadog vs Signicat
- Datadog vs Silent Eight
- Datadog vs Socket
- Datadog vs Socure
- Datadog vs SonicWall
- Datadog vs Sophos Intercept X
- Datadog vs Ory
- Datadog vs Sentry
- Datadog vs PagerDuty
- Datadog vs Dashlane
- Datadog vs LogRocket
- Datadog vs Okta
- Datadog vs Auth0
- Datadog vs Segment
- Datadog vs GitLab
- Datadog vs Coda
- Datadog vs ClickUp
- Datadog vs Linear
- Datadog vs Docker
- Datadog vs Jenkins
- Datadog vs Miro
- Datadog vs Personetics
- Datadog vs Plane
- Datadog vs Postman
- Datadog vs Raycast

