Cybersecurity · head to head
Arnica vs Entrust Identity as a Service

Arnica
Cybersecurity
AI-native application security platform detecting and fixing vulnerabilities across the SDLC
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Entrust Identity as a Service
Cybersecurity
Workforce and customer authentication from a certificate authority
- From
- $2/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Arnica has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Arnica per-identity pricing ($25-$50/person/year) requires tracking active developers; Entrust Identity as a Service the application integration catalogue is smaller than that of the dedicated identity vendors, so uncommon SaaS applications more often need custom SAML configuration rather than a template.
- They diverge on capability: Arnica covers AI SAST, Entrust Identity as a Service covers Multi-factor authentication.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Arnica and Entrust Identity as a Service actually diverge.
| Attribute | Arnica | Entrust Identity as a Service |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $2/month |
| Pricing model | Per-identity subscription with annual discount | Per user per month |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web, GitHub, IDE | Web, iOS, Android, Windows, Linux |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Arnica
- AI SAST
- Software Composition Analysis
- Secrets detection
- IaC scanning
- Container scanning
- SBOM generation
- Agentic rules
- Pipelineless integration
Only in Entrust Identity as a Service
- Multi-factor authentication
- Single sign-on
- Adaptive authentication
- Passwordless login
- Credential lifecycle
- Derived PIV credentials
- Directory integration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Arnica
- Detecting AI-generated vulnerabilities in Copilot and Cursor suggestionsnot Entrust Identity as a Service
- Finding hardcoded secrets before they reach productionnot Entrust Identity as a Service
- Mapping container vulnerabilities back to source codenot Entrust Identity as a Service
- Generating SBOM for supply chain compliance requirementsnot Entrust Identity as a Service
- Scanning infrastructure-as-code for misconfiguration risksnot Entrust Identity as a Service
Entrust Identity as a Service
- A government agency needing derived mobile credentials from an existing PIV smart card estatenot Arnica
- A bank that must support hardware tokens for corporate treasury users alongside push authentication for staffnot Arnica
- An organisation already buying Entrust certificates that wants credential issuance and authentication from one vendornot Arnica
- A defence supplier required to use certificate-based authentication that mainstream cloud identity products handle poorlynot Arnica
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Arnica
- Per-identity pricing ($25-$50/person/year) requires tracking active developers
- Overage identity tracking via 90-day PR activity can be unpredictable
- Free plan limited to weekly updates, requiring upgrade for real-time scanning
- Advanced add-ons (Image Scanning, AI SAST, Agentic Rules Enforcer) pricing not published
- On-premises deployment limited to Enterprise tier
Entrust Identity as a Service
- The application integration catalogue is smaller than that of the dedicated identity vendors, so uncommon SaaS applications more often need custom SAML configuration rather than a template.
- Developer experience for customer identity use cases is behind the specialists, and teams building consumer signup flows will find the APIs and documentation less complete.
- Advanced capabilities including adaptive authentication and credential management sit above the published entry price, so the two dollar figure rarely reflects what a regulated buyer actually spends.
- There are two overlapping products, Identity as a Service and Identity Enterprise, and choosing wrongly at the start means a migration later rather than a licence change.
- Identity governance, access certification and privileged access are not covered, so an organisation with audit-driven access review requirements needs a second vendor alongside it.
Pricing, plan by plan
Arnica
Free- FreeFree
- No credit card required
- 14-day trial available
- Weekly risk identification updates
- Core Business$360/year
- Monthly billing option at $30/identity/month
- Annual billing at $25/identity/month (17% discount)
- Real-time risk scanning and notifications
- Core Enterprise$720/year
- Monthly billing option at $60/identity/month
- Annual billing at $50/identity/month (17% discount)
- All Core Business features
Entrust Identity as a Service
$2/month- Workforce Standard$2/month
- Multi-factor authentication
- Single sign-on
- Directory integration
- Higher tiers$undefined/month
- Adaptive risk-based authentication
- Certificate and smart card credential management
- Derived PIV credentials
Which should you pick?
Choose Arnica if
- You need ai sast.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, GitHub, IDE.
- You also want software composition analysis.
Choose Entrust Identity as a Service if
- You need multi-factor authentication.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, Windows, Linux.
- You also want single sign-on.
Questions people ask
- Is Arnica or Entrust Identity as a Service better?
- Neither clearly leads. Arnica starts at Free and Entrust Identity as a Service at $2/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Arnica or Entrust Identity as a Service?
- Arnica has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Arnica and $2/month for Entrust Identity as a Service.
- Does Arnica or Entrust Identity as a Service run on more platforms?
- Arnica runs on Web, GitHub, IDE. Entrust Identity as a Service runs on Web, iOS, Android, Windows, Linux.
- Can I use Arnica for free?
- Yes. Arnica has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Entrust Identity as a Service starts at $2/month.
- What is Arnica best used for?
- Arnica is most often used for detecting ai-generated vulnerabilities in copilot and cursor suggestions, finding hardcoded secrets before they reach production, mapping container vulnerabilities back to source code, generating sbom for supply chain compliance requirements. Of those, detecting ai-generated vulnerabilities in copilot and cursor suggestions and finding hardcoded secrets before they reach production are not what Entrust Identity as a Service is typically brought in for.
- What can Arnica do that Entrust Identity as a Service cannot?
- Arnica covers AI SAST, Software Composition Analysis, Secrets detection, IaC scanning. Entrust Identity as a Service covers Multi-factor authentication, Single sign-on, Adaptive authentication, Passwordless login.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Arnica: How are identities defined in Arnica pricing?
Identities are any users and other contributing entities that contributed code and/or had PR activity during the last 90 days. This ensures billing matches active developers.
SourceEntrust Identity as a Service: Is MFA included or extra?
Multi-factor authentication is included in the workforce bundles rather than sold separately, which is not true of every competitor. Adaptive risk-based authentication sits in higher tiers.
Arnica: What is the annual discount?
Annual prepayment offers approximately 17% savings versus monthly billing. Core Business annual is $300/identity versus $360 for monthly.
SourceEntrust Identity as a Service: Does it do identity governance?
No. Access certification, role mining and joiner-mover-leaver governance require a separate product such as SailPoint or Saviynt.
Arnica: Can I cancel or downgrade Arnica anytime?
Yes. Subscriptions can be cancelled or downgraded at any time. Overage identities receive automatic protection with true-up invoicing.
SourceEntrust Identity as a Service: Why choose this over Okta or Entra ID?
Almost always because of PKI, smart cards or derived credentials. Without that requirement the mainstream platforms are the stronger general purpose choice.
Related pages
More on Entrust Identity as a Service
Other head to heads
- Arnica vs Semgrep
- Arnica vs Snyk
- Arnica vs Chainguard
- Arnica vs Tenable
- Arnica vs Doppler
- Arnica vs Aikido
- Arnica vs Endor Labs
- Arnica vs Trivy
- Arnica vs Socket
- Arnica vs Infisical
- Arnica vs Bitwarden
- Arnica vs RoboForm
- Arnica vs Sardine
- Arnica vs Semperis
- Arnica vs SentinelOne
- Arnica vs Shufti Pro
- Arnica vs Nessus
- Arnica vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Arnica vs Cisco Duo
- Arnica vs JumpCloud
- Arnica vs Ping Identity
- Arnica vs Frontegg
- Arnica vs Authelia
- Arnica vs Beyond Identity
- Arnica vs Transmit Security
- Arnica vs Akeyless
- Arnica vs authentik
- Arnica vs Logto
- Arnica vs Speakeasy
- Arnica vs Authy
- Arnica vs ExpressVPN
- Arnica vs Falco
- Arnica vs Fenergo
- Arnica vs Google Authenticator
- Arnica vs Grype
- Arnica vs Hanwha Vision
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Semgrep
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Snyk
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Chainguard
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Tenable
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Doppler
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Aikido
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Endor Labs
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Trivy
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Socket
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Infisical
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Bitwarden
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs RoboForm
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Sardine
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Semperis
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs SentinelOne
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Shufti Pro
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Nessus
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Cisco Duo
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs JumpCloud
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Ping Identity
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Frontegg
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Authelia
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Beyond Identity
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Transmit Security
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Akeyless
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs authentik
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Logto
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Speakeasy
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Authy
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs ExpressVPN
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Falco
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Fenergo
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Google Authenticator
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Grype
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Hanwha Vision
