Cybersecurity · head to head
Arnica vs Beyond Identity

Arnica
Cybersecurity
AI-native application security platform detecting and fixing vulnerabilities across the SDLC
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Beyond Identity
Cybersecurity
Phishing-resistant passwordless authentication with device trust enforced at every login
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Arnica has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Arnica per-identity pricing ($25-$50/person/year) requires tracking active developers; Beyond Identity it is an authentication layer, not an identity provider, so you keep and keep paying for Okta or Entra ID underneath and the combined per-user cost is roughly double a single-vendor approach.
- They diverge on capability: Arnica covers AI SAST, Beyond Identity covers Device-bound credentials.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Arnica and Beyond Identity actually diverge.
| Attribute | Arnica | Beyond Identity |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | Per-identity subscription with annual discount | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web, GitHub, IDE | Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Arnica
- AI SAST
- Software Composition Analysis
- Secrets detection
- IaC scanning
- Container scanning
- SBOM generation
- Agentic rules
- Pipelineless integration
Only in Beyond Identity
- Device-bound credentials
- Continuous device posture
- No shared secrets
- Identity provider integration
- Secure developer signing
- Administrator policy engine
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Arnica
- Detecting AI-generated vulnerabilities in Copilot and Cursor suggestionsnot Beyond Identity
- Finding hardcoded secrets before they reach productionnot Beyond Identity
- Mapping container vulnerabilities back to source codenot Beyond Identity
- Generating SBOM for supply chain compliance requirementsnot Beyond Identity
- Scanning infrastructure-as-code for misconfiguration risksnot Beyond Identity
Beyond Identity
- An organisation that suffered a breach through MFA push fatigue and needs a factor that cannot be socially engineerednot Arnica
- A software company enforcing that code is only signed from a managed device with current patchesnot Arnica
- A firm with contractors on unmanaged laptops that must meet posture requirements before reaching internal systemsnot Arnica
- A security team wanting to remove passwords from the helpdesk workload rather than adding another factor on topnot Arnica
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Arnica
- Per-identity pricing ($25-$50/person/year) requires tracking active developers
- Overage identity tracking via 90-day PR activity can be unpredictable
- Free plan limited to weekly updates, requiring upgrade for real-time scanning
- Advanced add-ons (Image Scanning, AI SAST, Agentic Rules Enforcer) pricing not published
- On-premises deployment limited to Enterprise tier
Beyond Identity
- It is an authentication layer, not an identity provider, so you keep and keep paying for Okta or Entra ID underneath and the combined per-user cost is roughly double a single-vendor approach.
- Every device that authenticates needs the platform authenticator installed, which makes onboarding contractors, third parties and shared kiosks awkward and sometimes impossible.
- Pricing is quoted per user with no published rates, so buyers cannot benchmark it against the increasingly capable passkey support now included in identity provider base licences.
- Losing all enrolled devices requires an administrative recovery path, and organisations that design that path poorly reintroduce a social-engineering target at the helpdesk.
- Legacy applications that only speak passwords or older protocols need a federation shim or stay outside the policy, so coverage is rarely complete in an estate with old systems.
Pricing, plan by plan
Arnica
Free- FreeFree
- No credit card required
- 14-day trial available
- Weekly risk identification updates
- Core Business$360/year
- Monthly billing option at $30/identity/month
- Annual billing at $25/identity/month (17% discount)
- Real-time risk scanning and notifications
- Core Enterprise$720/year
- Monthly billing option at $60/identity/month
- Annual billing at $50/identity/month (17% discount)
- All Core Business features
Beyond Identity
On request- Secure Access Platform$undefined/year
- Per-user annual subscription quoted by seat count
- Deployed alongside an existing identity provider rather than replacing it
- Device posture integrations with major EDR and MDM vendors included
Which should you pick?
Choose Arnica if
- You need ai sast.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, GitHub, IDE.
- You also want software composition analysis.
Choose Beyond Identity if
- You need device-bound credentials.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android.
- You also want continuous device posture.
Questions people ask
- Is Arnica or Beyond Identity better?
- Neither clearly leads. Arnica starts at Free and Beyond Identity at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Arnica or Beyond Identity?
- Arnica has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Arnica and On request for Beyond Identity.
- Does Arnica or Beyond Identity run on more platforms?
- Arnica runs on Web, GitHub, IDE. Beyond Identity runs on Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android.
- Can I use Arnica for free?
- Yes. Arnica has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Beyond Identity starts at On request.
- What is Arnica best used for?
- Arnica is most often used for detecting ai-generated vulnerabilities in copilot and cursor suggestions, finding hardcoded secrets before they reach production, mapping container vulnerabilities back to source code, generating sbom for supply chain compliance requirements. Of those, detecting ai-generated vulnerabilities in copilot and cursor suggestions and finding hardcoded secrets before they reach production are not what Beyond Identity is typically brought in for.
- What can Arnica do that Beyond Identity cannot?
- Arnica covers AI SAST, Software Composition Analysis, Secrets detection, IaC scanning. Beyond Identity covers Device-bound credentials, Continuous device posture, No shared secrets, Identity provider integration.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Arnica: How are identities defined in Arnica pricing?
Identities are any users and other contributing entities that contributed code and/or had PR activity during the last 90 days. This ensures billing matches active developers.
SourceBeyond Identity: Does it replace Okta or Entra ID?
No. It sits in front of them as the authentication method. Budget for both.
Arnica: What is the annual discount?
Annual prepayment offers approximately 17% savings versus monthly billing. Core Business annual is $300/identity versus $360 for monthly.
SourceBeyond Identity: What happens when a user loses their laptop?
They authenticate from another enrolled device, or go through an administrative recovery flow. Designing that recovery well matters, because it is the weakest point.
Arnica: Can I cancel or downgrade Arnica anytime?
Yes. Subscriptions can be cancelled or downgraded at any time. Overage identities receive automatic protection with true-up invoicing.
SourceBeyond Identity: Is it different from passkeys?
The credential mechanism is similar in spirit. The difference is enforcing device security posture at every authentication, which standard passkeys do not do.
Related pages
More on Beyond Identity
Other head to heads
- Arnica vs Semgrep
- Arnica vs Snyk
- Arnica vs Chainguard
- Arnica vs Tenable
- Arnica vs Doppler
- Arnica vs Aikido
- Arnica vs Endor Labs
- Arnica vs Trivy
- Arnica vs Socket
- Arnica vs Infisical
- Arnica vs Bitwarden
- Arnica vs RoboForm
- Arnica vs Sardine
- Arnica vs Semperis
- Arnica vs SentinelOne
- Arnica vs Shufti Pro
- Arnica vs Nessus
- Arnica vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Arnica vs 1Password
- Arnica vs Cisco Duo
- Arnica vs Transmit Security
- Arnica vs Teleport
- Arnica vs Authelia
- Arnica vs authentik
- Arnica vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Arnica vs Clerk
- Arnica vs Frontegg
- Arnica vs HashiCorp Boundary
- Arnica vs Logto
- Arnica vs Ory
- Arnica vs WorkOS
- Arnica vs Zscaler Internet Access
- Arnica vs Milestone XProtect
- Arnica vs Osano
- Arnica vs Proton Mail
- Arnica vs Veriff
- Beyond Identity vs Semgrep
- Beyond Identity vs Snyk
- Beyond Identity vs Chainguard
- Beyond Identity vs Tenable
- Beyond Identity vs Doppler
- Beyond Identity vs Aikido
- Beyond Identity vs Endor Labs
- Beyond Identity vs Trivy
- Beyond Identity vs Socket
- Beyond Identity vs Infisical
- Beyond Identity vs Bitwarden
- Beyond Identity vs RoboForm
- Beyond Identity vs Sardine
- Beyond Identity vs Semperis
- Beyond Identity vs SentinelOne
- Beyond Identity vs Shufti Pro
- Beyond Identity vs Nessus
- Beyond Identity vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Beyond Identity vs 1Password
- Beyond Identity vs Cisco Duo
- Beyond Identity vs Transmit Security
- Beyond Identity vs Teleport
- Beyond Identity vs Authelia
- Beyond Identity vs authentik
- Beyond Identity vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Beyond Identity vs Clerk
- Beyond Identity vs Frontegg
- Beyond Identity vs HashiCorp Boundary
- Beyond Identity vs Logto
- Beyond Identity vs Ory
- Beyond Identity vs WorkOS
- Beyond Identity vs Zscaler Internet Access
- Beyond Identity vs Milestone XProtect
- Beyond Identity vs Osano
- Beyond Identity vs Proton Mail
- Beyond Identity vs Veriff
