Cybersecurity · head to head
Entrust Identity as a Service vs Socket

Entrust Identity as a Service
Cybersecurity
Workforce and customer authentication from a certificate authority
- From
- $2/month
- Rated
- -

Socket
Cybersecurity
Supply chain security platform detecting and blocking malicious dependencies
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Socket has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Entrust Identity as a Service the application integration catalogue is smaller than that of the dedicated identity vendors, so uncommon SaaS applications more often need custom SAML configuration rather than a template.; Socket team plan requires minimum 5-developer commitment, expensive for small teams
- They diverge on capability: Entrust Identity as a Service covers Multi-factor authentication, Socket covers Malware detection.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Entrust Identity as a Service and Socket actually diverge.
| Attribute | Entrust Identity as a Service | Socket |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $2/month | Free |
| Pricing model | Per user per month | Per-developer monthly subscription with tiered access |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android, Windows, Linux | Web, CLI, GitHub |
| Founded | Unknown | 2021 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Entrust Identity as a Service
- Multi-factor authentication
- Single sign-on
- Adaptive authentication
- Passwordless login
- Credential lifecycle
- Derived PIV credentials
- Directory integration
Only in Socket
- Malware detection
- Automatic blocking
- AI behavior analysis
- Reachability analysis
- Slack integration
- SBOM support
- SAML SSO
- GitHub Actions scanning
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Entrust Identity as a Service
- A government agency needing derived mobile credentials from an existing PIV smart card estatenot Socket
- A bank that must support hardware tokens for corporate treasury users alongside push authentication for staffnot Socket
- An organisation already buying Entrust certificates that wants credential issuance and authentication from one vendornot Socket
- A defence supplier required to use certificate-based authentication that mainstream cloud identity products handle poorlynot Socket
Socket
- Blocking zero-day malware attacks in JavaScript dependenciesnot Entrust Identity as a Service
- Managing CVE false positives with precomputed reachability analysisnot Entrust Identity as a Service
- Securing Python and Go supply chains at scalenot Entrust Identity as a Service
- Automating compliance requirements for regulated industriesnot Entrust Identity as a Service
- Real-time threat notifications via Slack integrationnot Entrust Identity as a Service
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Entrust Identity as a Service
- The application integration catalogue is smaller than that of the dedicated identity vendors, so uncommon SaaS applications more often need custom SAML configuration rather than a template.
- Developer experience for customer identity use cases is behind the specialists, and teams building consumer signup flows will find the APIs and documentation less complete.
- Advanced capabilities including adaptive authentication and credential management sit above the published entry price, so the two dollar figure rarely reflects what a regulated buyer actually spends.
- There are two overlapping products, Identity as a Service and Identity Enterprise, and choosing wrongly at the start means a migration later rather than a licence change.
- Identity governance, access certification and privileged access are not covered, so an organisation with audit-driven access review requirements needs a second vendor alongside it.
Socket
- Team plan requires minimum 5-developer commitment, expensive for small teams
- Business plan $50/dev/month becomes costly for teams exceeding 20 members
- Enterprise pricing requires custom consultation with no transparent pricing
- Free plan limited to individual developers without team collaboration
- Reachability analysis improvement (90% false positive reduction) only on Enterprise
Pricing, plan by plan
Entrust Identity as a Service
$2/month- Workforce Standard$2/month
- Multi-factor authentication
- Single sign-on
- Directory integration
- Higher tiers$undefined/month
- Adaptive risk-based authentication
- Certificate and smart card credential management
- Derived PIV credentials
Socket
Free- FreeFree
- For individual developers
- Detects 70+ risk types
- Blocks malicious dependencies automatically
- Team$25/month
- Per developer on minimum 5 developers
- Precomputed reachability analysis cuts 60% false positives
- Slack alerts for threats
- Business$50/month
- Per developer on minimum 20 developers
- All Team features
- Compliance integrations with Vanta
- Enterprise$undefined/custom
- Function-level reachability eliminates up to 90% irrelevant CVEs
- Multi-repository system support
- Named account manager
Which should you pick?
Choose Entrust Identity as a Service if
- You need multi-factor authentication.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, Windows, Linux.
- You also want single sign-on.
Choose Socket if
- You need malware detection.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, CLI, GitHub.
- You also want automatic blocking.
Questions people ask
- Is Entrust Identity as a Service or Socket better?
- Neither clearly leads. Entrust Identity as a Service starts at $2/month and Socket at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Entrust Identity as a Service or Socket?
- Socket has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $2/month for Entrust Identity as a Service and Free for Socket.
- Does Entrust Identity as a Service or Socket run on more platforms?
- Entrust Identity as a Service runs on Web, iOS, Android, Windows, Linux. Socket runs on Web, CLI, GitHub.
- Can I use Socket for free?
- Yes. Socket has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Entrust Identity as a Service starts at $2/month.
- What is Entrust Identity as a Service best used for?
- Entrust Identity as a Service is most often used for a government agency needing derived mobile credentials from an existing piv smart card estate, a bank that must support hardware tokens for corporate treasury users alongside push authentication for staff, an organisation already buying entrust certificates that wants credential issuance and authentication from one vendor, a defence supplier required to use certificate-based authentication that mainstream cloud identity products handle poorly. Of those, a government agency needing derived mobile credentials from an existing piv smart card estate and a bank that must support hardware tokens for corporate treasury users alongside push authentication for staff are not what Socket is typically brought in for.
- What can Entrust Identity as a Service do that Socket cannot?
- Entrust Identity as a Service covers Multi-factor authentication, Single sign-on, Adaptive authentication, Passwordless login. Socket covers Malware detection, Automatic blocking, AI behavior analysis, Reachability analysis.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Entrust Identity as a Service: Is MFA included or extra?
Multi-factor authentication is included in the workforce bundles rather than sold separately, which is not true of every competitor. Adaptive risk-based authentication sits in higher tiers.
Socket: How many zero-day attacks does Socket detect?
Socket detects over 100 zero-day attacks weekly across JavaScript, Python, and Go ecosystems.
SourceEntrust Identity as a Service: Does it do identity governance?
No. Access certification, role mining and joiner-mover-leaver governance require a separate product such as SailPoint or Saviynt.
Socket: What is precomputed reachability analysis?
Socket's precomputed reachability analysis cuts CVE false positives by 60% automatically on Team plans, and up to 90% on Enterprise plans through function-level analysis.
SourceEntrust Identity as a Service: Why choose this over Okta or Entra ID?
Almost always because of PKI, smart cards or derived credentials. Without that requirement the mainstream platforms are the stronger general purpose choice.
Socket: Is there a discount for annual billing?
Yes. Socket offers a 20% discount for annual commitments across all subscription tiers.
SourceRelated pages
More on Entrust Identity as a Service
Other head to heads
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Cisco Duo
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs JumpCloud
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Ping Identity
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Frontegg
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Authelia
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Beyond Identity
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Transmit Security
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Akeyless
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs authentik
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Logto
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Speakeasy
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Authy
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs ExpressVPN
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Falco
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Fenergo
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Google Authenticator
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Grype
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Hanwha Vision
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Snyk
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Endor Labs
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs HashiCorp Vault
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Doppler
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Chainguard
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Arnica
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Semgrep
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs 1Password
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs LastPass
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Bitwarden
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Proofpoint
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Qualys VMDR
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Rapid7 InsightVM
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Recorded Future
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs RoboForm
- Socket vs Cisco Duo
- Socket vs JumpCloud
- Socket vs Ping Identity
- Socket vs Frontegg
- Socket vs Authelia
- Socket vs Beyond Identity
- Socket vs Transmit Security
- Socket vs Akeyless
- Socket vs authentik
- Socket vs Logto
- Socket vs Speakeasy
- Socket vs Authy
- Socket vs ExpressVPN
- Socket vs Falco
- Socket vs Fenergo
- Socket vs Google Authenticator
- Socket vs Grype
- Socket vs Hanwha Vision
- Socket vs Snyk
- Socket vs Endor Labs
- Socket vs HashiCorp Vault
- Socket vs Doppler
- Socket vs Chainguard
- Socket vs Arnica
- Socket vs Semgrep
- Socket vs 1Password
- Socket vs LastPass
- Socket vs Bitwarden
- Socket vs Proofpoint
- Socket vs Qualys VMDR
- Socket vs Rapid7 InsightVM
- Socket vs Recorded Future
- Socket vs RoboForm
