Software · head to head
Akita vs Close
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Akita starts at $49 a month with no free tier, only a 14 day trial; Close hidden costs beyond subscription: calling charges (~$0.02/minute), SMS usage fees, phone numbers ($1-5/month), AI call assistant ($50/month + $0.02/min transcription)
- They diverge on capability: Akita covers Health scores, Close covers Built-in calling.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Akita and Close actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Akita
- Health scores
- Customer segments
- Lifecycle stages
- Alerts
- Custom metrics
- Salesforce
- HubSpot
- Intercom
Only in Close
- Built-in calling
- Email automation
- SMS messaging
- Pipeline management
- Lead management
- Activity tracking
- Reporting
- Mobile app
Both cover
- Stripe
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Akita
- Centralising customer data and product activity for a customer success teamnot Close
- Building health scores to flag at-risk accountsnot Close
- Segmenting customers and triggering automated playbooksnot Close
- Identifying expansion revenue opportunitiesnot Close
- Task and workflow management for CSMsnot Close
Close
- Inside salesnot Akita
- Outbound salesnot Akita
- Lead managementnot Akita
- Sales engagementnot Akita
- Pipeline trackingnot Akita
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Akita
- Starts at $49 a month with no free tier, only a 14 day trial
- Tier breakdown above the entry price is not published
Close
- Hidden costs beyond subscription: calling charges (~$0.02/minute), SMS usage fees, phone numbers ($1-5/month), AI call assistant ($50/month + $0.02/min transcription)
- No built-in lead lists, company intelligence, or contact enrichment; must source leads separately
- Limited marketing automation compared to competitors like HubSpot; lacks lead scoring and nurturing campaigns
- Calling cost at scale can double effective monthly cost for high-volume SDR teams making 50+ calls per day
- Limited customization of data model compared to Salesforce; cannot create fully custom objects or complex relationships
Pricing, plan by plan
Akita
$160/month- Starter$160/month
- Health scores
- Basic integrations
- Alerts
- Professional$400/month
- Unlimited integrations
- Custom metrics
- API
Close
$9/month- Solo$9/month (annual)
- 1 user only
- 10,000 leads max
- Calling, email, SMS
- Essentials$35/month (annual)
- Unlimited contacts
- Team collaboration
- 1,000 AI credits/month
- Growth$99/month (annual)
- Automation workflows
- Power dialer
- Bulk email
- Scale$139/month (annual)
- Role-based permissions
- Predictive dialer
- Unlimited recording
Which should you pick?
Choose Close if
- You need built-in calling.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want email automation.
Questions people ask
- Is Akita or Close better?
- Neither clearly leads. Akita starts at $160/month and Close at $9/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Akita or Close?
- Akita starts at $160/month and Close at $9/month.
- Does Akita or Close run on more platforms?
- Akita runs on Web. Close runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is Akita best used for?
- Akita is most often used for centralising customer data and product activity for a customer success team, building health scores to flag at-risk accounts, segmenting customers and triggering automated playbooks, identifying expansion revenue opportunities. Of those, centralising customer data and product activity for a customer success team and building health scores to flag at-risk accounts are not what Close is typically brought in for.
- What can Akita do that Close cannot?
- Akita covers Health scores, Customer segments, Lifecycle stages, Alerts. Close covers Built-in calling, Email automation, SMS messaging, Pipeline management. Both handle Stripe, Web support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Close: What are Close's pricing plans and what do they include?
Close offers four plans: Solo ($9-19/user/month), Essentials ($35-49), Growth ($99-109), and Scale ($139-149). All include calling, email, SMS, and Chloe AI agent access. Essentials adds unlimited contacts and team collaboration. Growth adds automation, power dialer, and custom activities. Scale adds role-based permissions and unlimited recording. Annual billing saves up to 50%.
SourceClose: What are the hidden costs in Close's pricing beyond the subscription?
Close charges usage-based fees for calling (~$0.02 per minute), SMS charges per message, and phone number rentals ($1-5/month). The AI Call Assistant add-on costs $50/month plus $0.02 per minute for transcription. Heavy outbound calling teams can see their total costs increase 30-50% beyond the base seat price.
SourceClose: What is Chloe, Close's AI sales agent, and what can it do?
Chloe is an AI sales agent built into Close that automatically calls leads, qualifies prospects through real conversations, and can book meetings while updating the CRM automatically. Chloe features AI-generated call summaries, transcripts, and action items automatically logged to contacts.
SourceClose: Does Close include lead lists, data enrichment, or contact information?
No. Close does not provide built-in lead lists, company intelligence, or contact enrichment features. Organizations must source leads separately or use third-party data providers. This differs from platforms like HubSpot which include integrated lead databases.
SourceClose: What communication features does Close include?
Close includes built-in calling with automatic call logging, email templates and bulk email capabilities, SMS messaging with tracking and automation, email syncing with Gmail, and automated follow-up workflows. All communication happens within the CRM platform.
SourceClose: Does Close have marketing automation capabilities?
Close's marketing automation features are limited compared to HubSpot. It includes basic email sequences, task reminders, and workflow automation, but lacks advanced lead scoring, nurturing campaigns, and detailed marketing analytics. Organizations requiring extensive marketing automation need separate tools.
SourceRelated pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Akita vs Aviso
- Akita vs ChurnZero
- Akita vs Planhat
- Akita vs Catalyst
- Akita vs Custify
- Akita vs CustomerSuccessBox
- Akita vs SmartKarrot
- Akita vs Vitally
- Akita vs Amity
- Akita vs Apttus
- Akita vs Better Proposals
- Akita vs Chorus.ai
- Akita vs ClientPoint
- Akita vs ClientSuccess
- Akita vs Conga
- Akita vs Kapta
- Akita vs Lessonly
- Akita vs Natero
- Akita vs Intercom
- Akita vs Mixpanel
- Akita vs Heap
- Akita vs Canny
- Akita vs Drift
- Akita vs Pendo
- Akita vs Userpilot
- Close vs Aviso
- Close vs ChurnZero
- Close vs Planhat
- Close vs Catalyst
- Close vs Custify
- Close vs CustomerSuccessBox
- Close vs SmartKarrot
- Close vs Vitally
- Close vs Amity
- Close vs Apttus
- Close vs Better Proposals
- Close vs Chorus.ai
- Close vs ClientPoint
- Close vs ClientSuccess
- Close vs Conga
- Close vs Kapta
- Close vs Lessonly
- Close vs Natero
- Close vs Intercom
- Close vs Mixpanel
- Close vs Heap
- Close vs Canny
- Close vs Drift
- Close vs Pendo
- Close vs Userpilot


