SaaS · head to head
Close vs Conga
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Close hidden costs beyond subscription: calling charges (~$0.02/minute), SMS usage fees, phone numbers ($1-5/month), AI call assistant ($50/month + $0.02/min transcription); Conga conga's pricing page publishes no rate, no plan tier and no product list, and offers only a Get Conga Pricing enquiry button
- They diverge on capability: Close covers Built-in calling, Conga covers CPQ.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Close and Conga actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Close
- Built-in calling
- Email automation
- SMS messaging
- Pipeline management
- Lead management
- Activity tracking
- Reporting
- Mobile app
Only in Conga
- CPQ
- Contract lifecycle management
- Document generation
- E-signatures
- Workflow automation
- Salesforce
- Microsoft Dynamics
- SAP
Both cover
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Close
- Inside salesnot Conga
- Outbound salesnot Conga
- Lead managementnot Conga
- Sales engagementnot Conga
- Pipeline trackingnot Conga
Conga
- Generating quotes, contracts and documents from CRM datanot Close
- Contract lifecycle management with approvals and e-signaturenot Close
- Configure price quote workflows for complex salesnot Close
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Close
- Hidden costs beyond subscription: calling charges (~$0.02/minute), SMS usage fees, phone numbers ($1-5/month), AI call assistant ($50/month + $0.02/min transcription)
- No built-in lead lists, company intelligence, or contact enrichment; must source leads separately
- Limited marketing automation compared to competitors like HubSpot; lacks lead scoring and nurturing campaigns
- Calling cost at scale can double effective monthly cost for high-volume SDR teams making 50+ calls per day
- Limited customization of data model compared to Salesforce; cannot create fully custom objects or complex relationships
Conga
- Conga's pricing page publishes no rate, no plan tier and no product list, and offers only a Get Conga Pricing enquiry button
- Pricing is handled case by case through sales rather than through published tiers
- Conga's CPQ product is now branded Advantage CPQ and is positioned as an integration on top of an existing CRM, so a Salesforce or equivalent CRM licence is required separately
Pricing, plan by plan
Close
$9/month- Solo$9/month (annual)
- 1 user only
- 10,000 leads max
- Calling, email, SMS
- Essentials$35/month (annual)
- Unlimited contacts
- Team collaboration
- 1,000 AI credits/month
- Growth$99/month (annual)
- Automation workflows
- Power dialer
- Bulk email
- Scale$139/month (annual)
- Role-based permissions
- Predictive dialer
- Unlimited recording
Conga
$50/month- Essentials$50/month
- Document generation
- E-signatures
- Templates
- Professional$100/month
- CPQ
- CLM
- Workflow automation
Which should you pick?
Choose Close if
- You need built-in calling.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want email automation.
Questions people ask
- Is Close or Conga better?
- Neither clearly leads. Close starts at $9/month and Conga at $50/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Close or Conga?
- Close starts at $9/month and Conga at $50/month.
- Does Close or Conga run on more platforms?
- Close runs on Web, iOS, Android. Conga runs on Web.
- What is Close best used for?
- Close is most often used for inside sales, outbound sales, lead management, sales engagement. Of those, inside sales and outbound sales are not what Conga is typically brought in for.
- What can Close do that Conga cannot?
- Close covers Built-in calling, Email automation, SMS messaging, Pipeline management. Conga covers CPQ, Contract lifecycle management, Document generation, E-signatures. Both handle Web support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Close: What are Close's pricing plans and what do they include?
Close offers four plans: Solo ($9-19/user/month), Essentials ($35-49), Growth ($99-109), and Scale ($139-149). All include calling, email, SMS, and Chloe AI agent access. Essentials adds unlimited contacts and team collaboration. Growth adds automation, power dialer, and custom activities. Scale adds role-based permissions and unlimited recording. Annual billing saves up to 50%.
SourceClose: What are the hidden costs in Close's pricing beyond the subscription?
Close charges usage-based fees for calling (~$0.02 per minute), SMS charges per message, and phone number rentals ($1-5/month). The AI Call Assistant add-on costs $50/month plus $0.02 per minute for transcription. Heavy outbound calling teams can see their total costs increase 30-50% beyond the base seat price.
SourceClose: What is Chloe, Close's AI sales agent, and what can it do?
Chloe is an AI sales agent built into Close that automatically calls leads, qualifies prospects through real conversations, and can book meetings while updating the CRM automatically. Chloe features AI-generated call summaries, transcripts, and action items automatically logged to contacts.
SourceClose: Does Close include lead lists, data enrichment, or contact information?
No. Close does not provide built-in lead lists, company intelligence, or contact enrichment features. Organizations must source leads separately or use third-party data providers. This differs from platforms like HubSpot which include integrated lead databases.
SourceClose: What communication features does Close include?
Close includes built-in calling with automatic call logging, email templates and bulk email capabilities, SMS messaging with tracking and automation, email syncing with Gmail, and automated follow-up workflows. All communication happens within the CRM platform.
SourceClose: Does Close have marketing automation capabilities?
Close's marketing automation features are limited compared to HubSpot. It includes basic email sequences, task reminders, and workflow automation, but lacks advanced lead scoring, nurturing campaigns, and detailed marketing analytics. Organizations requiring extensive marketing automation need separate tools.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Close vs Intercom
- Close vs Mixpanel
- Close vs Heap
- Close vs Canny
- Close vs Drift
- Close vs Pendo
- Close vs Userpilot
- Close vs Aviso
- Close vs ChurnZero
- Close vs Planhat
- Close vs Catalyst
- Close vs Custify
- Close vs CustomerSuccessBox
- Close vs SmartKarrot
- Close vs Vitally
- Close vs Akita
- Close vs Amity
- Close vs Apttus
- Close vs Better Proposals
- Close vs Chorus.ai
- Close vs ClientPoint
- Close vs ClientSuccess
- Close vs Kapta
- Close vs Lessonly
- Close vs Natero
- Conga vs Intercom
- Conga vs Mixpanel
- Conga vs Heap
- Conga vs Canny
- Conga vs Drift
- Conga vs Pendo
- Conga vs Userpilot
- Conga vs Aviso
- Conga vs ChurnZero
- Conga vs Planhat
- Conga vs Catalyst
- Conga vs Custify
- Conga vs CustomerSuccessBox
- Conga vs SmartKarrot
- Conga vs Vitally
- Conga vs Akita
- Conga vs Amity
- Conga vs Apttus
- Conga vs Better Proposals
- Conga vs Chorus.ai
- Conga vs ClientPoint
- Conga vs ClientSuccess
- Conga vs Kapta
- Conga vs Lessonly
- Conga vs Natero


