Maps · head to head
Agisoft Metashape vs RealityScan

Agisoft Metashape
Maps
Desktop photogrammetry that turns photographs into point clouds, meshes, orthomosaics and DEMs
- From
- $179/one-time
- Rated
- -

RealityScan
CAD
The photogrammetry engine formerly called RealityCapture, free below a one million dollar revenue line
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only RealityScan has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Agisoft Metashape processing is entirely local, so throughput is a function of your workstation, and a large project on modest hardware can take days where a cloud service would return results overnight.; RealityScan the free tier is bounded by company revenue rather than by usage, so a business crossing one million US dollars of turnover acquires a per-seat cost overnight for software its workflow now depends on
- They diverge on capability: Agisoft Metashape covers Structure-from-motion alignment, RealityScan covers Photogrammetric reconstruction.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Agisoft Metashape and RealityScan actually diverge.
| Attribute | Agisoft Metashape | RealityScan |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $179/one-time | Free |
| Pricing model | One-time purchase | Free below a revenue threshold, then per seat per year |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Windows, macOS, Linux | Windows |
| Category | Maps | CAD |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Agisoft Metashape
- Structure-from-motion alignment
- Dense point cloud generation
- Mesh and texture
- Orthomosaic and DEM
- Point cloud classification
- Multispectral processing
- Python and Java scripting
- Network processing
Only in RealityScan
- Photogrammetric reconstruction
- Laser scan fusion
- Texturing and unwrapping
- Command line interface
- Unreal Engine path
- Component alignment control
Both cover
- Ground control points
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Agisoft Metashape
- A survey or engineering firm processing high volumes of drone imagery that wants unlimited local processing instead of per-hectare cloud creditsnot RealityScan
- A quarry or mine measuring stockpile volumes monthly, where the same flight is reprocessed repeatedly and cloud pricing by area is punitivenot RealityScan
- An archaeology or heritage team documenting sites on a capital grant with no recurring software budget to renew a subscriptionnot RealityScan
- A VFX or games studio scanning props and environments, where Standard at $179 covers the whole requirement because georeferencing is irrelevantnot RealityScan
RealityScan
- A two-person heritage survey practice under the revenue threshold that can now run professional photogrammetry at no licence costnot Agisoft Metashape
- A film or games asset team scanning props and environments at very high image counts where processing speed decides the schedulenot Agisoft Metashape
- A survey firm combining terrestrial laser scans with drone photography and needing both aligned in a single reconstructionnot Agisoft Metashape
- A construction reality-capture operator producing meshes for Unreal-based client visualisation from the same source imagerynot Agisoft Metashape
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Agisoft Metashape
- Processing is entirely local, so throughput is a function of your workstation, and a large project on modest hardware can take days where a cloud service would return results overnight.
- The vendor is a Russian company, and since 2022 payment is restricted to wire transfer, ACH and SEPA direct debit with no card payment, which some corporate and government procurement departments simply cannot process.
- There is no collaboration layer: no shared projects, no web viewer, no permissions. Sharing results means sending files, which is a real limitation on multi-office teams.
- Support is thin compared with commercial drone platforms, and the software assumes photogrammetric competence; users who do not understand overlap, ground control and residuals produce confidently wrong models.
- A node-locked licence is tied to a machine, and moving it or covering a second workstation means either a reseller-quoted floating licence or buying twice, which erodes the cost advantage for teams rather than individuals.
RealityScan
- The free tier is bounded by company revenue rather than by usage, so a business crossing one million US dollars of turnover acquires a per-seat cost overnight for software its workflow now depends on
- New perpetual licences are no longer sold, so an organisation that deliberately avoided subscription software has no route in; existing perpetual holders keep their version but stop receiving updates unless they accept the current terms
- It is Windows only and needs an NVIDIA CUDA capable GPU, which excludes macOS studios and makes the real cost of adoption a workstation purchase rather than a licence
- The rename from RealityCapture to RealityScan in 2025 means tutorials, forum answers and third party pipeline documentation are split across two names and several licensing regimes, and much of it is now wrong about price
- The interface assumes photogrammetry knowledge; alignment failures, control point placement and reconstruction region setup are not guided, so a team without an experienced operator produces poor models quickly rather than good ones slowly
Pricing, plan by plan
Agisoft Metashape
$179/one-time- Standard$179/one-time
- Photogrammetric alignment, dense cloud, mesh and texture
- No georeferencing or coordinate systems
- No ground control points
- Professional$3499/one-time
- Everything in Standard
- Georeferencing, coordinate systems and ground control points
- Orthomosaic, DEM and point cloud classification
- Floating licence$undefined/one-time
- Shared across machines rather than node-locked
- Sold through authorised resellers only
- Quoted rather than listed
RealityScan
Free- Free tierFree
- For individuals and companies with annual revenue under 1,000,000 USD
- Full application, no metered input charges
- Epic account required
- RealityScan seat$1250/year
- Required once annual revenue exceeds 1,000,000 USD
- Per seat, per year
- Commercial use without output restrictions
- Unreal Engine subscription$1850/year
- Per seat per year
- Includes RealityScan and Twinmotion
- For teams that also need Unreal Engine for non-game commercial use
Which should you pick?
Choose Agisoft Metashape if
- You need structure-from-motion alignment.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Linux.
- You also want dense point cloud generation.
Choose RealityScan if
- You need photogrammetric reconstruction.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want laser scan fusion.
Questions people ask
- Is Agisoft Metashape or RealityScan better?
- Neither clearly leads. Agisoft Metashape starts at $179/one-time and RealityScan at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Agisoft Metashape or RealityScan?
- RealityScan has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $179/one-time for Agisoft Metashape and Free for RealityScan.
- Does Agisoft Metashape or RealityScan run on more platforms?
- Agisoft Metashape runs on Windows, macOS, Linux. RealityScan runs on Windows.
- Can I use RealityScan for free?
- Yes. RealityScan has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Agisoft Metashape starts at $179/one-time.
- What is Agisoft Metashape best used for?
- Agisoft Metashape is most often used for a survey or engineering firm processing high volumes of drone imagery that wants unlimited local processing instead of per-hectare cloud credits, a quarry or mine measuring stockpile volumes monthly, where the same flight is reprocessed repeatedly and cloud pricing by area is punitive, an archaeology or heritage team documenting sites on a capital grant with no recurring software budget to renew a subscription, a vfx or games studio scanning props and environments, where standard at $179 covers the whole requirement because georeferencing is irrelevant. Of those, a survey or engineering firm processing high volumes of drone imagery that wants unlimited local processing instead of per-hectare cloud credits and a quarry or mine measuring stockpile volumes monthly, where the same flight is reprocessed repeatedly and cloud pricing by area is punitive are not what RealityScan is typically brought in for.
- What can Agisoft Metashape do that RealityScan cannot?
- Agisoft Metashape covers Structure-from-motion alignment, Dense point cloud generation, Mesh and texture, Orthomosaic and DEM. RealityScan covers Photogrammetric reconstruction, Laser scan fusion, Texturing and unwrapping, Command line interface. Both handle Ground control points.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Agisoft Metashape: How much does Metashape cost?
Professional is $3,499 and Standard is $179, both node-locked. Floating licences are quoted through resellers.
RealityScan: Is RealityCapture still called that?
No. Epic rebranded it to RealityScan with version 2.0 in 2025. It is the same engine and the same team.
Agisoft Metashape: Is it a subscription?
No. These are perpetual node-locked licences. Major version upgrades are charged separately.
RealityScan: Who gets it free?
Individuals and companies with annual revenue under one million US dollars. Above that, a seat is 1,250 US dollars per year.
Agisoft Metashape: What is the difference between Standard and Professional?
Standard has no georeferencing, coordinate systems, ground control points, orthomosaic export or scripting. Anything survey or mapping related requires Professional.
RealityScan: Can I still buy a perpetual licence?
Not for new purchases. Existing perpetual licences remain valid for the version owned, with updates only under the current terms.
Agisoft Metashape: Does it process in the cloud?
No. All processing is local on your own hardware, which is the main reason it is cheap at volume and slow on weak machines.
RealityScan: Does the free version restrict output?
No output metering or watermarking; the restriction is on who qualifies, based on company revenue, not on what you export.
Agisoft Metashape: Are there educational licences?
Yes, Agisoft offers reduced academic pricing on a separate page.
Related pages
More on Agisoft Metashape
More on RealityScan
Other head to heads
- Agisoft Metashape vs QGIS
- Agisoft Metashape vs Correlator3D
- Agisoft Metashape vs Global Mapper
- Agisoft Metashape vs Cesium ion
- Agisoft Metashape vs Potree
- Agisoft Metashape vs Leica Infinity
- Agisoft Metashape vs Emlid Studio
- Agisoft Metashape vs onX Maps
- Agisoft Metashape vs SW Maps
- Agisoft Metashape vs Fused
- Agisoft Metashape vs Lonboard
- Agisoft Metashape vs Trailforks
- Agisoft Metashape vs Atlas.co
- Agisoft Metashape vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- Agisoft Metashape vs Felt
- Agisoft Metashape vs Geographic Calculator
- Agisoft Metashape vs Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler
- Agisoft Metashape vs CloudCompare
- Agisoft Metashape vs Carlson Software
- Agisoft Metashape vs Nomad Sculpt
- Agisoft Metashape vs ANSYS Fluent
- Agisoft Metashape vs KiCad
- Agisoft Metashape vs MicroSurvey CAD
- Agisoft Metashape vs Zoo
- Agisoft Metashape vs Bentley MicroStation
- Agisoft Metashape vs Houdini
- Agisoft Metashape vs D5 Render
- Agisoft Metashape vs LightWave 3D
- Agisoft Metashape vs ZBrush
- Agisoft Metashape vs Arnold
- Agisoft Metashape vs Inventor
- Agisoft Metashape vs Mudbox
- RealityScan vs QGIS
- RealityScan vs Correlator3D
- RealityScan vs Global Mapper
- RealityScan vs Cesium ion
- RealityScan vs Potree
- RealityScan vs Leica Infinity
- RealityScan vs Emlid Studio
- RealityScan vs onX Maps
- RealityScan vs SW Maps
- RealityScan vs Fused
- RealityScan vs Lonboard
- RealityScan vs Trailforks
- RealityScan vs Atlas.co
- RealityScan vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- RealityScan vs Felt
- RealityScan vs Geographic Calculator
- RealityScan vs Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler
- RealityScan vs CloudCompare
- RealityScan vs Carlson Software
- RealityScan vs Nomad Sculpt
- RealityScan vs ANSYS Fluent
- RealityScan vs KiCad
- RealityScan vs MicroSurvey CAD
- RealityScan vs Zoo
- RealityScan vs Bentley MicroStation
- RealityScan vs Houdini
- RealityScan vs D5 Render
- RealityScan vs LightWave 3D
- RealityScan vs ZBrush
- RealityScan vs Arnold
- RealityScan vs Inventor
- RealityScan vs Mudbox
