Maps · head to head
Global Mapper vs RealityScan

Global Mapper
Maps
A GIS and lidar desktop that still sells a genuine perpetual licence with published prices
- From
- $700/one-time
- Rated
- -

RealityScan
CAD
The photogrammetry engine formerly called RealityCapture, free below a one million dollar revenue line
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only RealityScan has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Global Mapper it is Windows only with no macOS or Linux build, so mixed-platform teams end up running a virtual machine and lose graphics performance on large point clouds; RealityScan the free tier is bounded by company revenue rather than by usage, so a business crossing one million US dollars of turnover acquires a per-seat cost overnight for software its workflow now depends on
- They diverge on capability: Global Mapper covers Format breadth, RealityScan covers Photogrammetric reconstruction.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Global Mapper and RealityScan actually diverge.
| Attribute | Global Mapper | RealityScan |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $700/one-time | Free |
| Pricing model | One-time purchase | Free below a revenue threshold, then per seat per year |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Category | Maps | CAD |
Identical on both: platforms (Windows), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Global Mapper
- Format breadth
- Lidar processing
- Pixels to Points
- Coordinate transformation
- Terrain analysis
- Scripting
- Mobile companion
Only in RealityScan
- Photogrammetric reconstruction
- Laser scan fusion
- Ground control points
- Texturing and unwrapping
- Command line interface
- Unreal Engine path
- Component alignment control
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Global Mapper
- A survey office that receives lidar in a different format from every client and needs reliable conversion without writing scriptsnot RealityScan
- A consultancy that wants to classify ground points and extract building footprints from a drone survey without an Esri enterprise agreementnot RealityScan
- An organisation with an irregular workload that wants to buy the licence outright and skip maintenance in quiet yearsnot RealityScan
- A geologist producing volumes, contours and cross sections from terrain data on a standalone office workstationnot RealityScan
RealityScan
- A two-person heritage survey practice under the revenue threshold that can now run professional photogrammetry at no licence costnot Global Mapper
- A film or games asset team scanning props and environments at very high image counts where processing speed decides the schedulenot Global Mapper
- A survey firm combining terrestrial laser scans with drone photography and needing both aligned in a single reconstructionnot Global Mapper
- A construction reality-capture operator producing meshes for Unreal-based client visualisation from the same source imagerynot Global Mapper
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Global Mapper
- It is Windows only with no macOS or Linux build, so mixed-platform teams end up running a virtual machine and lose graphics performance on large point clouds
- The interface has grown by accretion over two decades and features are scattered across menus, so new users are slow to find capabilities that are already installed
- Node-locked perpetual licences are tied to the machine identifier, so a hardware refresh or a failed workstation means a support request rather than a login on a new device
- Multi-user and web publishing are weak relative to Esri or QGIS with a server stack, so it is a desktop analysis tool and not a platform for sharing data across an organisation
- Published prices apply to North America and differ elsewhere, so buyers outside that market must go through a reseller and cannot rely on the listed figures for budgeting
RealityScan
- The free tier is bounded by company revenue rather than by usage, so a business crossing one million US dollars of turnover acquires a per-seat cost overnight for software its workflow now depends on
- New perpetual licences are no longer sold, so an organisation that deliberately avoided subscription software has no route in; existing perpetual holders keep their version but stop receiving updates unless they accept the current terms
- It is Windows only and needs an NVIDIA CUDA capable GPU, which excludes macOS studios and makes the real cost of adoption a workstation purchase rather than a licence
- The rename from RealityCapture to RealityScan in 2025 means tutorials, forum answers and third party pipeline documentation are split across two names and several licensing regimes, and much of it is now wrong about price
- The interface assumes photogrammetry knowledge; alignment failures, control point placement and reconstruction region setup are not guided, so a team without an experienced operator produces poor models quickly rather than good ones slowly
Pricing, plan by plan
Global Mapper
$700/one-time- Global Mapper Standard, node-locked$700/one-time
- Perpetual licence tied to one machine
- First year of maintenance and support included
- Renewal 245 USD per year, optional
- Global Mapper Standard, floating or dongle$1050/one-time
- Shared between users or carried on a USB dongle
- Maintenance renewal 365 USD per year
- Network licence 2,100 USD with a two-seat minimum
- Global Mapper Pro, node-locked$1750/one-time
- Adds lidar classification, feature extraction and Pixels to Points
- Maintenance renewal 610 USD per year
- Upgrade from Standard version 26 costs 1,050 USD
- Global Mapper Pro, floating or dongle$2625/one-time
- Shared or dongle licence
- Maintenance renewal 915 USD per year
- Network licence 5,250 USD with a two-seat minimum
RealityScan
Free- Free tierFree
- For individuals and companies with annual revenue under 1,000,000 USD
- Full application, no metered input charges
- Epic account required
- RealityScan seat$1250/year
- Required once annual revenue exceeds 1,000,000 USD
- Per seat, per year
- Commercial use without output restrictions
- Unreal Engine subscription$1850/year
- Per seat per year
- Includes RealityScan and Twinmotion
- For teams that also need Unreal Engine for non-game commercial use
Which should you pick?
Choose Global Mapper if
- You need format breadth.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want lidar processing.
Choose RealityScan if
- You need photogrammetric reconstruction.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want laser scan fusion.
Questions people ask
- Is Global Mapper or RealityScan better?
- Neither clearly leads. Global Mapper starts at $700/one-time and RealityScan at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Global Mapper or RealityScan?
- RealityScan has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $700/one-time for Global Mapper and Free for RealityScan.
- Does Global Mapper or RealityScan run on more platforms?
- Both run on Windows, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use RealityScan for free?
- Yes. RealityScan has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Global Mapper starts at $700/one-time.
- What is Global Mapper best used for?
- Global Mapper is most often used for a survey office that receives lidar in a different format from every client and needs reliable conversion without writing scripts, a consultancy that wants to classify ground points and extract building footprints from a drone survey without an esri enterprise agreement, an organisation with an irregular workload that wants to buy the licence outright and skip maintenance in quiet years, a geologist producing volumes, contours and cross sections from terrain data on a standalone office workstation. Of those, a survey office that receives lidar in a different format from every client and needs reliable conversion without writing scripts and a consultancy that wants to classify ground points and extract building footprints from a drone survey without an esri enterprise agreement are not what RealityScan is typically brought in for.
- What can Global Mapper do that RealityScan cannot?
- Global Mapper covers Format breadth, Lidar processing, Pixels to Points, Coordinate transformation. RealityScan covers Photogrammetric reconstruction, Laser scan fusion, Ground control points, Texturing and unwrapping.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Global Mapper: Is there still a perpetual licence?
Yes. Blue Marble sells perpetual node-locked, floating, dongle and network licences that keep working after maintenance lapses.
RealityScan: Is RealityCapture still called that?
No. Epic rebranded it to RealityScan with version 2.0 in 2025. It is the same engine and the same team.
Global Mapper: What is the difference between Standard and Pro?
Pro is an add-on to a matching Standard licence and carries the lidar classification, feature extraction, Pixels to Points photogrammetry and advanced terrain tools.
RealityScan: Who gets it free?
Individuals and companies with annual revenue under one million US dollars. Above that, a seat is 1,250 US dollars per year.
Global Mapper: Do I have to pay maintenance?
Only for the first year, which is included. After that it is optional; without it the software continues to run but you receive no upgrades or support.
RealityScan: Can I still buy a perpetual licence?
Not for new purchases. Existing perpetual licences remain valid for the version owned, with updates only under the current terms.
Global Mapper: Can it replace ArcGIS?
For desktop format conversion, lidar and terrain analysis, often yes. For enterprise data management, web services and organisation-wide sharing, no.
RealityScan: Does the free version restrict output?
No output metering or watermarking; the restriction is on who qualifies, based on company revenue, not on what you export.
Related pages
More on Global Mapper
More on RealityScan
Other head to heads
- Global Mapper vs Esri ArcGIS
- Global Mapper vs SAGA GIS
- Global Mapper vs QGIS
- Global Mapper vs Emlid Studio
- Global Mapper vs WhiteboxTools
- Global Mapper vs Potree
- Global Mapper vs Agisoft Metashape
- Global Mapper vs Leica Infinity
- Global Mapper vs GRASS GIS
- Global Mapper vs Felt
- Global Mapper vs CARTO
- Global Mapper vs GraphHopper
- Global Mapper vs HERE WeGo
- Global Mapper vs IndoorAtlas
- Global Mapper vs Mappedin
- Global Mapper vs MapTiler
- Global Mapper vs ArcGIS Survey123
- Global Mapper vs Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler
- Global Mapper vs CloudCompare
- Global Mapper vs Carlson Software
- Global Mapper vs Nomad Sculpt
- Global Mapper vs ANSYS Fluent
- Global Mapper vs KiCad
- Global Mapper vs MicroSurvey CAD
- Global Mapper vs Zoo
- Global Mapper vs Bentley MicroStation
- Global Mapper vs Houdini
- Global Mapper vs D5 Render
- Global Mapper vs LightWave 3D
- Global Mapper vs ZBrush
- Global Mapper vs Arnold
- Global Mapper vs Inventor
- Global Mapper vs Mudbox
- RealityScan vs Esri ArcGIS
- RealityScan vs SAGA GIS
- RealityScan vs QGIS
- RealityScan vs Emlid Studio
- RealityScan vs WhiteboxTools
- RealityScan vs Potree
- RealityScan vs Agisoft Metashape
- RealityScan vs Leica Infinity
- RealityScan vs GRASS GIS
- RealityScan vs Felt
- RealityScan vs CARTO
- RealityScan vs GraphHopper
- RealityScan vs HERE WeGo
- RealityScan vs IndoorAtlas
- RealityScan vs Mappedin
- RealityScan vs MapTiler
- RealityScan vs ArcGIS Survey123
- RealityScan vs Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler
- RealityScan vs CloudCompare
- RealityScan vs Carlson Software
- RealityScan vs Nomad Sculpt
- RealityScan vs ANSYS Fluent
- RealityScan vs KiCad
- RealityScan vs MicroSurvey CAD
- RealityScan vs Zoo
- RealityScan vs Bentley MicroStation
- RealityScan vs Houdini
- RealityScan vs D5 Render
- RealityScan vs LightWave 3D
- RealityScan vs ZBrush
- RealityScan vs Arnold
- RealityScan vs Inventor
- RealityScan vs Mudbox
