Maps · head to head
Agisoft Metashape vs Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler

Agisoft Metashape
Maps
Desktop photogrammetry that turns photographs into point clouds, meshes, orthomosaics and DEMs
- From
- $179/one-time
- Rated
- -

Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler
CAD
Photogrammetry engine formerly sold as ContextCapture, now inside Bentley's iTwin line
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Agisoft Metashape processing is entirely local, so throughput is a function of your workstation, and a large project on modest hardware can take days where a cloud service would return results overnight.; Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler the rename from ContextCapture is more than cosmetic: licensing moved into Bentley's subscription and consumption model, and existing perpetual users should confirm what a renewal converts to before assuming continuity of cost.
- They diverge on capability: Agisoft Metashape covers Structure-from-motion alignment, Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler covers Aerial triangulation.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Agisoft Metashape and Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler actually diverge.
| Attribute | Agisoft Metashape | Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $179/one-time | On request |
| Pricing model | One-time purchase | quote |
| Platforms | Windows, macOS, Linux | Windows, Cloud |
| Category | Maps | CAD |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Agisoft Metashape
- Structure-from-motion alignment
- Dense point cloud generation
- Mesh and texture
- Orthomosaic and DEM
- Ground control points
- Point cloud classification
- Multispectral processing
- Python and Java scripting
Only in Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler
- Aerial triangulation
- Dense mesh reconstruction
- Point cloud fusion
- Orthophoto and DSM output
- 3D Tiles and 3MX export
- Distributed processing
- Retouching and editing
- Georeferencing and control
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Agisoft Metashape
- A survey or engineering firm processing high volumes of drone imagery that wants unlimited local processing instead of per-hectare cloud creditsnot Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler
- A quarry or mine measuring stockpile volumes monthly, where the same flight is reprocessed repeatedly and cloud pricing by area is punitivenot Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler
- An archaeology or heritage team documenting sites on a capital grant with no recurring software budget to renew a subscriptionnot Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler
- A VFX or games studio scanning props and environments, where Standard at $179 covers the whole requirement because georeferencing is irrelevantnot Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler
Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler
- A highway authority reconstructing a corridor from drone imagery for design work in OpenRoadsnot Agisoft Metashape
- A survey firm delivering city-scale textured meshes to a municipal client for planning and visualisationnot Agisoft Metashape
- An engineering consultancy fusing terrestrial laser scans with drone photography of a bridge for condition assessmentnot Agisoft Metashape
- A team publishing streamable 3D Tiles of a construction site so stakeholders can view it in a browsernot Agisoft Metashape
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Agisoft Metashape
- Processing is entirely local, so throughput is a function of your workstation, and a large project on modest hardware can take days where a cloud service would return results overnight.
- The vendor is a Russian company, and since 2022 payment is restricted to wire transfer, ACH and SEPA direct debit with no card payment, which some corporate and government procurement departments simply cannot process.
- There is no collaboration layer: no shared projects, no web viewer, no permissions. Sharing results means sending files, which is a real limitation on multi-office teams.
- Support is thin compared with commercial drone platforms, and the software assumes photogrammetric competence; users who do not understand overlap, ground control and residuals produce confidently wrong models.
- A node-locked licence is tied to a machine, and moving it or covering a second workstation means either a reseller-quoted floating licence or buying twice, which erodes the cost advantage for teams rather than individuals.
Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler
- The rename from ContextCapture is more than cosmetic: licensing moved into Bentley's subscription and consumption model, and existing perpetual users should confirm what a renewal converts to before assuming continuity of cost.
- Consumption-based entitlements make the cost of a large reconstruction hard to predict in advance, which is awkward when you are quoting a fixed-price deliverable to a client.
- The desktop engine is Windows only and reconstruction is compute-hungry, so meaningful throughput needs either serious workstation hardware or paid cloud processing.
- Bentley does not publish a plain rate card and pricing varies by region, reseller and existing agreement, so two firms buying the same thing can pay very different amounts.
- Value compounds inside the Bentley ecosystem, and a firm whose design work happens in Autodesk or Esri tools pays for a positioning it will not use while getting the same mesh a cheaper standalone photogrammetry package would produce.
Pricing, plan by plan
Agisoft Metashape
$179/one-time- Standard$179/one-time
- Photogrammetric alignment, dense cloud, mesh and texture
- No georeferencing or coordinate systems
- No ground control points
- Professional$3499/one-time
- Everything in Standard
- Georeferencing, coordinate systems and ground control points
- Orthomosaic, DEM and point cloud classification
- Floating licence$undefined/one-time
- Shared across machines rather than node-locked
- Sold through authorised resellers only
- Quoted rather than listed
Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler
On request- iTwin Capture Modeler$undefined/year
- Subscription entitlement through Bentley licensing
- Consumption charged against Bentley Keys on some agreements
- Reality Modeling WorkSuite bundles Modeler with reality data management
Which should you pick?
Choose Agisoft Metashape if
- You need structure-from-motion alignment.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Linux.
- You also want dense point cloud generation.
Choose Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler if
- You need aerial triangulation.
- You work on Windows, Cloud.
- You also want dense mesh reconstruction.
Questions people ask
- Is Agisoft Metashape or Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler better?
- Neither clearly leads. Agisoft Metashape starts at $179/one-time and Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Agisoft Metashape or Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler?
- Agisoft Metashape starts at $179/one-time and Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler at On request.
- Does Agisoft Metashape or Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler run on more platforms?
- Agisoft Metashape runs on Windows, macOS, Linux. Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler runs on Windows, Cloud.
- What is Agisoft Metashape best used for?
- Agisoft Metashape is most often used for a survey or engineering firm processing high volumes of drone imagery that wants unlimited local processing instead of per-hectare cloud credits, a quarry or mine measuring stockpile volumes monthly, where the same flight is reprocessed repeatedly and cloud pricing by area is punitive, an archaeology or heritage team documenting sites on a capital grant with no recurring software budget to renew a subscription, a vfx or games studio scanning props and environments, where standard at $179 covers the whole requirement because georeferencing is irrelevant. Of those, a survey or engineering firm processing high volumes of drone imagery that wants unlimited local processing instead of per-hectare cloud credits and a quarry or mine measuring stockpile volumes monthly, where the same flight is reprocessed repeatedly and cloud pricing by area is punitive are not what Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler is typically brought in for.
- What can Agisoft Metashape do that Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler cannot?
- Agisoft Metashape covers Structure-from-motion alignment, Dense point cloud generation, Mesh and texture, Orthomosaic and DEM. Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler covers Aerial triangulation, Dense mesh reconstruction, Point cloud fusion, Orthophoto and DSM output.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Agisoft Metashape: How much does Metashape cost?
Professional is $3,499 and Standard is $179, both node-locked. Floating licences are quoted through resellers.
Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler: Is ContextCapture discontinued?
The name is. The product continues as iTwin Capture Modeler within Bentley's iTwin family.
Agisoft Metashape: Is it a subscription?
No. These are perpetual node-locked licences. Major version upgrades are charged separately.
Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler: Does it still support a perpetual licence?
New buyers should expect subscription or consumption-based entitlements. Confirm the exact conversion path if you hold an older perpetual licence.
Agisoft Metashape: What is the difference between Standard and Professional?
Standard has no georeferencing, coordinate systems, ground control points, orthomosaic export or scripting. Anything survey or mapping related requires Professional.
Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler: Can it process laser scan data as well as photographs?
Yes. It fuses point clouds with imagery in a single reconstruction.
Agisoft Metashape: Does it process in the cloud?
No. All processing is local on your own hardware, which is the main reason it is cheap at volume and slow on weak machines.
Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler: Do I need other Bentley software to use it?
No, output formats are usable elsewhere, but the commercial and workflow case is strongest if you already run MicroStation or OpenRoads.
Agisoft Metashape: Are there educational licences?
Yes, Agisoft offers reduced academic pricing on a separate page.
Related pages
More on Agisoft Metashape
More on Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler
Other head to heads
- Agisoft Metashape vs QGIS
- Agisoft Metashape vs Correlator3D
- Agisoft Metashape vs Global Mapper
- Agisoft Metashape vs Cesium ion
- Agisoft Metashape vs Potree
- Agisoft Metashape vs Leica Infinity
- Agisoft Metashape vs Emlid Studio
- Agisoft Metashape vs onX Maps
- Agisoft Metashape vs SW Maps
- Agisoft Metashape vs Fused
- Agisoft Metashape vs Lonboard
- Agisoft Metashape vs Trailforks
- Agisoft Metashape vs Atlas.co
- Agisoft Metashape vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- Agisoft Metashape vs Felt
- Agisoft Metashape vs Geographic Calculator
- Agisoft Metashape vs RealityScan
- Agisoft Metashape vs Carlson Software
- Agisoft Metashape vs ANSYS Fluent
- Agisoft Metashape vs MicroSurvey CAD
- Agisoft Metashape vs FreeCAD
- Agisoft Metashape vs Altium 365
- Agisoft Metashape vs CloudCompare
- Agisoft Metashape vs KiCad
- Agisoft Metashape vs Nomad Sculpt
- Agisoft Metashape vs Zoo
- Agisoft Metashape vs Enscape
- Agisoft Metashape vs Siemens NX
- Agisoft Metashape vs Shapr3D
- Agisoft Metashape vs Houdini
- Agisoft Metashape vs ZBrush
- Agisoft Metashape vs Arnold
- Agisoft Metashape vs Inventor
- Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler vs QGIS
- Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler vs Correlator3D
- Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler vs Global Mapper
- Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler vs Cesium ion
- Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler vs Potree
- Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler vs Leica Infinity
- Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler vs Emlid Studio
- Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler vs onX Maps
- Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler vs SW Maps
- Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler vs Fused
- Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler vs Lonboard
- Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler vs Trailforks
- Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler vs Atlas.co
- Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler vs Felt
- Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler vs Geographic Calculator
- Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler vs RealityScan
- Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler vs Carlson Software
- Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler vs ANSYS Fluent
- Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler vs MicroSurvey CAD
- Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler vs FreeCAD
- Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler vs Altium 365
- Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler vs CloudCompare
- Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler vs KiCad
- Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler vs Nomad Sculpt
- Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler vs Zoo
- Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler vs Enscape
- Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler vs Siemens NX
- Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler vs Shapr3D
- Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler vs Houdini
- Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler vs ZBrush
- Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler vs Arnold
- Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler vs Inventor
