Maps · head to head
Agisoft Metashape vs Mappedin

Agisoft Metashape
Maps
Desktop photogrammetry that turns photographs into point clouds, meshes, orthomosaics and DEMs
- From
- $179/one-time
- Rated
- -

Mappedin
Maps
Enterprise indoor mapping platform that helps venues create interactive 3D maps, wayfinding
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Mappedin has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Agisoft Metashape processing is entirely local, so throughput is a function of your workstation, and a large project on modest hardware can take days where a cloud service would return results overnight.; Mappedin location naming is the leading source of integration failures, requiring manual cleanup of AI-generated labels
- They diverge on capability: Agisoft Metashape covers Structure-from-motion alignment, Mappedin covers Core Functionality.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Agisoft Metashape and Mappedin actually diverge.
| Attribute | Agisoft Metashape | Mappedin |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $179/one-time | Free |
| Pricing model | One-time purchase | Unknown |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Windows, macOS, Linux | Web, iOS, Android, Cloud |
| Founded | Unknown | 2011 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maps).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Agisoft Metashape
- Structure-from-motion alignment
- Dense point cloud generation
- Mesh and texture
- Orthomosaic and DEM
- Ground control points
- Point cloud classification
- Multispectral processing
- Python and Java scripting
Only in Mappedin
- Core Functionality
- User Interface
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Agisoft Metashape
- A survey or engineering firm processing high volumes of drone imagery that wants unlimited local processing instead of per-hectare cloud creditsnot Mappedin
- A quarry or mine measuring stockpile volumes monthly, where the same flight is reprocessed repeatedly and cloud pricing by area is punitivenot Mappedin
- An archaeology or heritage team documenting sites on a capital grant with no recurring software budget to renew a subscriptionnot Mappedin
- A VFX or games studio scanning props and environments, where Standard at $179 covers the whole requirement because georeferencing is irrelevantnot Mappedin
Mappedin
- Indoor navigation and map experience for buildingsnot Agisoft Metashape
- Operations management for facility and workplace planningnot Agisoft Metashape
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Agisoft Metashape
- Processing is entirely local, so throughput is a function of your workstation, and a large project on modest hardware can take days where a cloud service would return results overnight.
- The vendor is a Russian company, and since 2022 payment is restricted to wire transfer, ACH and SEPA direct debit with no card payment, which some corporate and government procurement departments simply cannot process.
- There is no collaboration layer: no shared projects, no web viewer, no permissions. Sharing results means sending files, which is a real limitation on multi-office teams.
- Support is thin compared with commercial drone platforms, and the software assumes photogrammetric competence; users who do not understand overlap, ground control and residuals produce confidently wrong models.
- A node-locked licence is tied to a machine, and moving it or covering a second workstation means either a reseller-quoted floating licence or buying twice, which erodes the cost advantage for teams rather than individuals.
Mappedin
- Location naming is the leading source of integration failures, requiring manual cleanup of AI-generated labels
- Multi-building campus maps not supported for Microsoft Places integration
- No native digital signage CMS for integrated sign management
- Limited analytics capabilities compared to competitors in complex enterprise environments
Pricing, plan by plan
Agisoft Metashape
$179/one-time- Standard$179/one-time
- Photogrammetric alignment, dense cloud, mesh and texture
- No georeferencing or coordinate systems
- No ground control points
- Professional$3499/one-time
- Everything in Standard
- Georeferencing, coordinate systems and ground control points
- Orthomosaic, DEM and point cloud classification
- Floating licence$undefined/one-time
- Shared across machines rather than node-locked
- Sold through authorised resellers only
- Quoted rather than listed
Mappedin
Free- FreeFree
- 1 map
- Basic indoor mapping
- No SDK access
- Custom Enterprise$undefined/mo
- Subscription-based on square footage
- Full platform access
- SDKs and APIs
Which should you pick?
Choose Agisoft Metashape if
- You need structure-from-motion alignment.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Linux.
- You also want dense point cloud generation.
Choose Mappedin if
- You need core functionality.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, Cloud.
- You also want user interface.
Questions people ask
- Is Agisoft Metashape or Mappedin better?
- Neither clearly leads. Agisoft Metashape starts at $179/one-time and Mappedin at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Agisoft Metashape or Mappedin?
- Mappedin has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $179/one-time for Agisoft Metashape and Free for Mappedin.
- Does Agisoft Metashape or Mappedin run on more platforms?
- Agisoft Metashape runs on Windows, macOS, Linux. Mappedin runs on Web, iOS, Android, Cloud.
- Can I use Mappedin for free?
- Yes. Mappedin has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Agisoft Metashape starts at $179/one-time.
- What is Agisoft Metashape best used for?
- Agisoft Metashape is most often used for a survey or engineering firm processing high volumes of drone imagery that wants unlimited local processing instead of per-hectare cloud credits, a quarry or mine measuring stockpile volumes monthly, where the same flight is reprocessed repeatedly and cloud pricing by area is punitive, an archaeology or heritage team documenting sites on a capital grant with no recurring software budget to renew a subscription, a vfx or games studio scanning props and environments, where standard at $179 covers the whole requirement because georeferencing is irrelevant. Of those, a survey or engineering firm processing high volumes of drone imagery that wants unlimited local processing instead of per-hectare cloud credits and a quarry or mine measuring stockpile volumes monthly, where the same flight is reprocessed repeatedly and cloud pricing by area is punitive are not what Mappedin is typically brought in for.
- What can Agisoft Metashape do that Mappedin cannot?
- Agisoft Metashape covers Structure-from-motion alignment, Dense point cloud generation, Mesh and texture, Orthomosaic and DEM. Mappedin covers Core Functionality, User Interface.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Agisoft Metashape: How much does Metashape cost?
Professional is $3,499 and Standard is $179, both node-locked. Floating licences are quoted through resellers.
Mappedin: Does Mappedin support multi-building campus mapping?
Mappedin supports multi-building deployments, but the Places integration requires each building to be mapped as a separate venue rather than as one unified campus map.
SourceAgisoft Metashape: Is it a subscription?
No. These are perpetual node-locked licences. Major version upgrades are charged separately.
Mappedin: How long does it take to deploy Mappedin for a large venue?
Large venue deployments typically go live within 30-60 days from contract signature. The Mappedin Maker platform enables rapid map creation from floor plans, with professional map-making services available for additional fees.
SourceAgisoft Metashape: What is the difference between Standard and Professional?
Standard has no georeferencing, coordinate systems, ground control points, orthomosaic export or scripting. Anything survey or mapping related requires Professional.
Mappedin: What platforms and SDKs does Mappedin provide?
Mappedin offers SDKs for Web, iOS, and Android, plus comprehensive APIs and webhooks for integrations. The platform supports venues including airports, shopping malls, stadiums, workplaces, and healthcare facilities.
SourceAgisoft Metashape: Does it process in the cloud?
No. All processing is local on your own hardware, which is the main reason it is cheap at volume and slow on weak machines.
Mappedin: Does Mappedin have a free plan?
Yes, Mappedin offers a free plan for creating one initial digital map at app.mappedin.com. Pricing is subscription-based and scales with building size in square footage or square meters.
SourceAgisoft Metashape: Are there educational licences?
Yes, Agisoft offers reduced academic pricing on a separate page.
Mappedin: What compliance certifications does Mappedin have?
Mappedin is SOC2 certified, GDPR compliant, and WCAG accessible. The platform includes real-time data management and analytics capabilities.
SourceRelated pages
More on Agisoft Metashape
Other head to heads
- Agisoft Metashape vs QGIS
- Agisoft Metashape vs Correlator3D
- Agisoft Metashape vs Global Mapper
- Agisoft Metashape vs Cesium ion
- Agisoft Metashape vs Potree
- Agisoft Metashape vs Leica Infinity
- Agisoft Metashape vs Emlid Studio
- Agisoft Metashape vs onX Maps
- Agisoft Metashape vs SW Maps
- Agisoft Metashape vs Fused
- Agisoft Metashape vs Lonboard
- Agisoft Metashape vs Trailforks
- Agisoft Metashape vs Atlas.co
- Agisoft Metashape vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- Agisoft Metashape vs Felt
- Agisoft Metashape vs Geographic Calculator
- Agisoft Metashape vs Esri ArcGIS
- Agisoft Metashape vs Mapbox
- Agisoft Metashape vs IndoorAtlas
- Agisoft Metashape vs Google Maps Platform
- Agisoft Metashape vs LocationIQ
- Agisoft Metashape vs HERE Technologies
- Agisoft Metashape vs CARTO
- Agisoft Metashape vs Leaflet
- Agisoft Metashape vs Radar
- Agisoft Metashape vs TomTom Developer Portal
- Agisoft Metashape vs Apple Maps
- Agisoft Metashape vs Navmii GPS
- Agisoft Metashape vs Nominatim
- Agisoft Metashape vs OpenLayers
- Agisoft Metashape vs OpenRouteService
- Agisoft Metashape vs OpenStreetMap
- Agisoft Metashape vs OsmAnd
- Mappedin vs QGIS
- Mappedin vs Correlator3D
- Mappedin vs Global Mapper
- Mappedin vs Cesium ion
- Mappedin vs Potree
- Mappedin vs Leica Infinity
- Mappedin vs Emlid Studio
- Mappedin vs onX Maps
- Mappedin vs SW Maps
- Mappedin vs Fused
- Mappedin vs Lonboard
- Mappedin vs Trailforks
- Mappedin vs Atlas.co
- Mappedin vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- Mappedin vs Felt
- Mappedin vs Geographic Calculator
- Mappedin vs Esri ArcGIS
- Mappedin vs Mapbox
- Mappedin vs IndoorAtlas
- Mappedin vs Google Maps Platform
- Mappedin vs LocationIQ
- Mappedin vs HERE Technologies
- Mappedin vs CARTO
- Mappedin vs Leaflet
- Mappedin vs Radar
- Mappedin vs TomTom Developer Portal
- Mappedin vs Apple Maps
- Mappedin vs Navmii GPS
- Mappedin vs Nominatim
- Mappedin vs OpenLayers
- Mappedin vs OpenRouteService
- Mappedin vs OpenStreetMap
- Mappedin vs OsmAnd
