Automation Integration · head to head
Activiti vs Trigger.dev

Activiti
Automation Integration
Apache 2.0 BPMN engine under Hyland, from which Flowable and Camunda were forked
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Trigger.dev
Automation Integration
Build and deploy fully managed AI agents and workflows
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Activiti the last stable release was 8.2.0 in January 2024, and while release candidate builds continue, a two-year gap between stable versions is a real risk signal for a production dependency.; Trigger.dev unclear scaling costs beyond included limits; pricing becomes complex beyond base plan features
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Activiti and Trigger.dev actually diverge.
| Attribute | Activiti | Trigger.dev |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Open source, no licence fee | freemium |
| Platforms | Linux, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes | Web |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Automation Integration).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Activiti
- BPMN 2.0 engine
- Activiti Cloud
- Modeler
- Java and REST APIs
- Pluggable persistence
- Identity integration
Only in Trigger.dev
Nothing recorded that Activiti does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Activiti
- An Alfresco or Hyland content services deployment where Activiti is already the embedded workflow enginenot Trigger.dev
- A Java application that needs to embed a BPMN engine as a library under a permissive licencenot Trigger.dev
- An organisation that has ruled out Camunda 8 on licence grounds and needs an Apache 2.0 alternativenot Trigger.dev
- Document-centric approval workflows where the process engine sits inside the content management stack rather than beside itnot Trigger.dev
Trigger.dev
- Job automation and workflow orchestrationnot Activiti
- API-driven task schedulingnot Activiti
- Background job processing for applicationsnot Activiti
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Activiti
- The last stable release was 8.2.0 in January 2024, and while release candidate builds continue, a two-year gap between stable versions is a real risk signal for a production dependency.
- Both Camunda and Flowable forked away and took large parts of the contributor base with them, so the community, tutorials and third-party tooling around Activiti are much thinner than around either fork.
- Commercial support is only realistically available by buying Hyland Alfresco subscriptions, so there is no way to pay for Activiti support on its own.
- Activiti Cloud imposes a distributed architecture of several Spring Boot services plus Keycloak, which is heavy for teams who simply wanted an embeddable engine.
- Documentation is dated and partly split between old Alfresco sites and Hyland Connect, and the transition between Activiti 6, 7 and 8 architectures makes much of the older material actively misleading.
Trigger.dev
- Unclear scaling costs beyond included limits; pricing becomes complex beyond base plan features
- No published Enterprise pricing; requires contacting sales
- HIPAA BAA compliance requires separate add-on request
- Pro plan uses conditional language that obscures exact overage costs
- Compute billing granularity is unclear; waits under 5 seconds still consume compute resources
Pricing, plan by plan
Activiti
Free- ActivitiFree
- Apache 2.0 licence
- Embeddable Java library or Activiti Cloud services
- No usage limits
Trigger.dev
Free- FreeFree
- $5 monthly credits
- 20 concurrent runs
- 1 day log retention
- Hobby$10/month
- $10 monthly credits
- 50 concurrent runs
- 7 day log retention
- Pro$50/month
- $50 monthly credits
- 200+ concurrent runs
- 30 day log retention
- Enterprise$null/month
- Custom discounts
- RBAC and SSO
- SOC 2 reports
Which should you pick?
Choose Activiti if
- You need bpmn 2.0 engine.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes.
- You also want activiti cloud.
Questions people ask
- Is Activiti or Trigger.dev better?
- Neither clearly leads. Activiti starts at Free and Trigger.dev at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Activiti or Trigger.dev?
- Activiti starts at Free and Trigger.dev at Free.
- Does Activiti or Trigger.dev run on more platforms?
- Activiti runs on Linux, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes. Trigger.dev runs on Web.
- Can I use Activiti for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Activiti best used for?
- Activiti is most often used for an alfresco or hyland content services deployment where activiti is already the embedded workflow engine, a java application that needs to embed a bpmn engine as a library under a permissive licence, an organisation that has ruled out camunda 8 on licence grounds and needs an apache 2.0 alternative, document-centric approval workflows where the process engine sits inside the content management stack rather than beside it. Of those, an alfresco or hyland content services deployment where activiti is already the embedded workflow engine and a java application that needs to embed a bpmn engine as a library under a permissive licence are not what Trigger.dev is typically brought in for.
- What can Activiti do that Trigger.dev cannot?
- Activiti covers BPMN 2.0 engine, Activiti Cloud, Modeler, Java and REST APIs.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Activiti: Is Activiti still maintained?
Yes, Hyland continues to publish builds, but the last stable release was 8.2.0 in January 2024.
Trigger.dev: Is there a free plan for Trigger.dev?
Yes, the Free plan offers $5 in monthly credits, 20 concurrent runs, 1 day log retention, and community support at no cost.
SourceActiviti: What is its relationship to Camunda and Flowable?
Both are forks of Activiti: Camunda in 2013 and Flowable in 2016, when core developers left Alfresco.
Trigger.dev: What's the starting price for a paid plan?
The Hobby plan costs $10 per month USD and includes $10 monthly credits, 50 concurrent runs, and 7 day log retention.
SourceActiviti: What licence is it?
Apache 2.0, which distinguishes it from Camunda 8’s source-available licence.
Activiti: Should I choose Activiti for a new project?
Only if the Apache licence or an existing Alfresco deployment is decisive. Flowable and Camunda have far larger ecosystems.
Related pages
More on Trigger.dev
Other head to heads
- Activiti vs n8n
- Activiti vs Temporal
- Activiti vs Flowable
- Activiti vs jBPM
- Activiti vs Camunda
- Activiti vs Nango
- Activiti vs Kogito
- Activiti vs Airbyte
- Activiti vs Windmill
- Activiti vs Meltano
- Activiti vs Zapier
- Activiti vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Activiti vs Census
- Activiti vs Decodable
- Activiti vs Dify
- Activiti vs Flowise
- Activiti vs MuleSoft
- Activiti vs Inngest
- Activiti vs CrewAI
- Activiti vs Autonoly
- Activiti vs Dagster
- Activiti vs Prefect
- Activiti vs Tray.io
- Activiti vs Cyclr
- Activiti vs Hightouch
- Activiti vs Jitterbit
- Activiti vs Pipedream
- Trigger.dev vs n8n
- Trigger.dev vs Temporal
- Trigger.dev vs Flowable
- Trigger.dev vs jBPM
- Trigger.dev vs Camunda
- Trigger.dev vs Nango
- Trigger.dev vs Kogito
- Trigger.dev vs Airbyte
- Trigger.dev vs Windmill
- Trigger.dev vs Meltano
- Trigger.dev vs Zapier
- Trigger.dev vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Trigger.dev vs Census
- Trigger.dev vs Decodable
- Trigger.dev vs Dify
- Trigger.dev vs Flowise
- Trigger.dev vs MuleSoft
- Trigger.dev vs Inngest
- Trigger.dev vs CrewAI
- Trigger.dev vs Autonoly
- Trigger.dev vs Dagster
- Trigger.dev vs Prefect
- Trigger.dev vs Tray.io
- Trigger.dev vs Cyclr
- Trigger.dev vs Hightouch
- Trigger.dev vs Jitterbit
- Trigger.dev vs Pipedream
