Automation Integration · head to head
Activiti vs CrewAI

Activiti
Automation Integration
Apache 2.0 BPMN engine under Hyland, from which Flowable and Camunda were forked
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

CrewAI
Automation Integration
The Enterprise Agent Build and Runtime for the work your business runs on
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Activiti the last stable release was 8.2.0 in January 2024, and while release candidate builds continue, a two-year gap between stable versions is a real risk signal for a production dependency.; CrewAI free tier limited to only 50 workflow executions per month
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Activiti and CrewAI actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Automation Integration).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Activiti
- BPMN 2.0 engine
- Activiti Cloud
- Modeler
- Java and REST APIs
- Pluggable persistence
- Identity integration
Only in CrewAI
Nothing recorded that Activiti does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Activiti
- An Alfresco or Hyland content services deployment where Activiti is already the embedded workflow enginenot CrewAI
- A Java application that needs to embed a BPMN engine as a library under a permissive licencenot CrewAI
- An organisation that has ruled out Camunda 8 on licence grounds and needs an Apache 2.0 alternativenot CrewAI
- Document-centric approval workflows where the process engine sits inside the content management stack rather than beside itnot CrewAI
CrewAI
- Enriching sales leads with company revenue and insights automaticallynot Activiti
- Accelerating first contact with leads from multiple systemsnot Activiti
- Automating quality assurance testing for voice agentsnot Activiti
- Generating curriculum content and instructor materials instantlynot Activiti
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Activiti
- The last stable release was 8.2.0 in January 2024, and while release candidate builds continue, a two-year gap between stable versions is a real risk signal for a production dependency.
- Both Camunda and Flowable forked away and took large parts of the contributor base with them, so the community, tutorials and third-party tooling around Activiti are much thinner than around either fork.
- Commercial support is only realistically available by buying Hyland Alfresco subscriptions, so there is no way to pay for Activiti support on its own.
- Activiti Cloud imposes a distributed architecture of several Spring Boot services plus Keycloak, which is heavy for teams who simply wanted an embeddable engine.
- Documentation is dated and partly split between old Alfresco sites and Hyland Connect, and the transition between Activiti 6, 7 and 8 architectures makes much of the older material actively misleading.
CrewAI
- Free tier limited to only 50 workflow executions per month
- Enterprise pricing is not published; requires contact for quote
- No public information about paid tier pricing between free and enterprise
Pricing, plan by plan
Activiti
Free- ActivitiFree
- Apache 2.0 licence
- Embeddable Java library or Activiti Cloud services
- No usage limits
CrewAI
Free- BasicFree
- 50 workflow executions/month
- Visual editor and AI copilot
- GitHub integration
- Enterprise$null/month
- Custom pricing upon request
- Everything in Basic plus advanced features
- Enterprise connectors
Which should you pick?
Choose Activiti if
- You need bpmn 2.0 engine.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes.
- You also want activiti cloud.
Questions people ask
- Is Activiti or CrewAI better?
- Neither clearly leads. Activiti starts at Free and CrewAI at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Activiti or CrewAI?
- Activiti starts at Free and CrewAI at Free.
- Does Activiti or CrewAI run on more platforms?
- Activiti runs on Linux, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes. CrewAI runs on Web.
- Can I use Activiti for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Activiti best used for?
- Activiti is most often used for an alfresco or hyland content services deployment where activiti is already the embedded workflow engine, a java application that needs to embed a bpmn engine as a library under a permissive licence, an organisation that has ruled out camunda 8 on licence grounds and needs an apache 2.0 alternative, document-centric approval workflows where the process engine sits inside the content management stack rather than beside it. Of those, an alfresco or hyland content services deployment where activiti is already the embedded workflow engine and a java application that needs to embed a bpmn engine as a library under a permissive licence are not what CrewAI is typically brought in for.
- What can Activiti do that CrewAI cannot?
- Activiti covers BPMN 2.0 engine, Activiti Cloud, Modeler, Java and REST APIs.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Activiti: Is Activiti still maintained?
Yes, Hyland continues to publish builds, but the last stable release was 8.2.0 in January 2024.
CrewAI: Is CrewAI free?
CrewAI offers a free Basic tier that includes 50 workflow executions per month, access to the visual editor, AI copilot, and GitHub integration. Enterprise plans with custom pricing are available for larger deployments.
SourceActiviti: What is its relationship to Camunda and Flowable?
Both are forks of Activiti: Camunda in 2013 and Flowable in 2016, when core developers left Alfresco.
CrewAI: How much does CrewAI Enterprise cost?
CrewAI Enterprise pricing is custom and available upon request. Enterprise includes dedicated VPC deployment, FedRamp High compliance, SSO and RBAC, PII redaction, and dedicated support with 45-day onboarding.
SourceActiviti: What licence is it?
Apache 2.0, which distinguishes it from Camunda 8’s source-available licence.
CrewAI: Can I self-host CrewAI?
Enterprise tier customers can deploy CrewAI on their own VPC or own infrastructure in addition to CrewAI cloud deployment, but specific pricing for self-hosted options is not published.
SourceActiviti: Should I choose Activiti for a new project?
Only if the Apache licence or an existing Alfresco deployment is decisive. Flowable and Camunda have far larger ecosystems.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Activiti vs n8n
- Activiti vs Temporal
- Activiti vs Flowable
- Activiti vs jBPM
- Activiti vs Camunda
- Activiti vs Nango
- Activiti vs Kogito
- Activiti vs Airbyte
- Activiti vs Windmill
- Activiti vs Meltano
- Activiti vs Zapier
- Activiti vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Activiti vs Census
- Activiti vs Decodable
- Activiti vs Dify
- Activiti vs Flowise
- Activiti vs MuleSoft
- Activiti vs Trigger.dev
- Activiti vs Autonoly
- Activiti vs Dagster
- Activiti vs RudderStack
- Activiti vs Prefect
- Activiti vs Automation Anywhere
- Activiti vs Nintex
- Activiti vs Celigo
- Activiti vs Stitch
- Activiti vs Talend
- Activiti vs Tealium
- Activiti vs Tines
- Activiti vs Xano
- CrewAI vs n8n
- CrewAI vs Temporal
- CrewAI vs Flowable
- CrewAI vs jBPM
- CrewAI vs Camunda
- CrewAI vs Nango
- CrewAI vs Kogito
- CrewAI vs Airbyte
- CrewAI vs Windmill
- CrewAI vs Meltano
- CrewAI vs Zapier
- CrewAI vs Microsoft Power Automate
- CrewAI vs Census
- CrewAI vs Decodable
- CrewAI vs Dify
- CrewAI vs Flowise
- CrewAI vs MuleSoft
- CrewAI vs Trigger.dev
- CrewAI vs Autonoly
- CrewAI vs Dagster
- CrewAI vs RudderStack
- CrewAI vs Prefect
- CrewAI vs Automation Anywhere
- CrewAI vs Nintex
- CrewAI vs Celigo
- CrewAI vs Stitch
- CrewAI vs Talend
- CrewAI vs Tealium
- CrewAI vs Tines
- CrewAI vs Xano
