Software · head to head
Achievers vs Paragon
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Achievers pricing is not published and requires a demo; Paragon no price is published for either plan, and both require a quote
- They diverge on capability: Achievers covers Peer-to-peer recognition, Paragon covers Embedded workflows.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Achievers and Paragon actually diverge.
Identical on both: pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Achievers
- Peer-to-peer recognition
- Manager recognition
- Points-based rewards
- Marketplace rewards
- Pulse surveys
- Employee connections
- Analytics dashboard
- Values alignment
Only in Paragon
- Embedded workflows
- Native integrations
- Workflow builder
- Error handling
- Monitoring
- Analytics
- Webhooks
- 500+ apps
Both cover
- Slack
- GDPR
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Achievers
- Employee recognitionnot Paragon
- Rewards programnot Paragon
- Engagement measurementnot Paragon
- Culture buildingnot Paragon
- Retention improvementnot Paragon
Paragon
- Embedding third party integrations into a SaaS productnot Achievers
- Managing customer facing connectors without building each onenot Achievers
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Achievers
- Pricing is not published and requires a demo
- Aimed at mid-market and enterprise organisations rather than small teams
- Sold as separate named modules, Recognize, Reward and Celebrate, so a full programme means more than one line on the quote
Paragon
- No price is published for either plan, and both require a quote
- Cost scales with the number of customer tenants using the integrations, so the bill follows an end customer count rather than the vendor's own usage
- SAML SSO, self hosting, dynamic field mapping and SLAs are all Enterprise only
Pricing, plan by plan
Achievers
On request- Recognize$undefined/month
- Peer-to-peer recognition
- Manager recognition
- Points & rewards
- Listen$undefined/month
- Engagement surveys
- Pulse surveys
- Analytics
- Connect$undefined/month
- Employee connections
- Interest groups
- Events
Paragon
$299/month- Starter$299/month
- 50 integrations
- Basic support
- Growth$999/month
- 200 integrations
- Priority support
- Enterprise$5000/month
- Unlimited integrations
- Dedicated support
Which should you pick?
Choose Achievers if
- You need peer-to-peer recognition.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android, Api.
- You also want manager recognition.
Choose Paragon if
- You need embedded workflows.
- You work on Web, Embedded.
- You also want native integrations.
Questions people ask
- Is Achievers or Paragon better?
- Neither clearly leads. Achievers starts at On request and Paragon at $299/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Achievers or Paragon?
- Achievers starts at On request and Paragon at $299/month.
- Does Achievers or Paragon run on more platforms?
- Achievers runs on Web, Ios, Android, Api. Paragon runs on Web, Embedded.
- What is Achievers best used for?
- Achievers is most often used for employee recognition, rewards program, engagement measurement, culture building. Of those, employee recognition and rewards program are not what Paragon is typically brought in for.
- What can Achievers do that Paragon cannot?
- Achievers covers Peer-to-peer recognition, Manager recognition, Points-based rewards, Marketplace rewards. Paragon covers Embedded workflows, Native integrations, Workflow builder, Error handling. Both handle Slack, GDPR.
Related pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Achievers vs BambooHR
- Achievers vs Workday
- Achievers vs Culture Amp
- Achievers vs Freshteam
- Achievers vs TINYpulse
- Achievers vs Zoho People
- Achievers vs 15Five
- Achievers vs Bonusly
- Achievers vs CharlieHR
- Achievers vs Kudos
- Achievers vs Lattice
- Achievers vs Personio
- Achievers vs Breathe HR
- Achievers vs Darwinbox
- Achievers vs Employment Hero
- Achievers vs greytHR
- Achievers vs HiBob
- Achievers vs Homebase
- Achievers vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Achievers vs n8n
- Achievers vs Zapier
- Achievers vs MuleSoft
- Achievers vs Parabola
- Achievers vs Zapier Plus
- Achievers vs Jitterbit
- Achievers vs mParticle
- Achievers vs RudderStack
- Achievers vs Workato
- Achievers vs Airbyte
- Achievers vs Automate.io
- Achievers vs Boomi
- Achievers vs Browser Use
- Achievers vs Browserbase
- Achievers vs Celigo
- Achievers vs Census
- Achievers vs CrewAI
- Paragon vs BambooHR
- Paragon vs Workday
- Paragon vs Culture Amp
- Paragon vs Freshteam
- Paragon vs TINYpulse
- Paragon vs Zoho People
- Paragon vs 15Five
- Paragon vs Bonusly
- Paragon vs CharlieHR
- Paragon vs Kudos
- Paragon vs Lattice
- Paragon vs Personio
- Paragon vs Breathe HR
- Paragon vs Darwinbox
- Paragon vs Employment Hero
- Paragon vs greytHR
- Paragon vs HiBob
- Paragon vs Homebase
- Paragon vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Paragon vs n8n
- Paragon vs Zapier
- Paragon vs MuleSoft
- Paragon vs Parabola
- Paragon vs Zapier Plus
- Paragon vs Jitterbit
- Paragon vs mParticle
- Paragon vs RudderStack
- Paragon vs Workato
- Paragon vs Airbyte
- Paragon vs Automate.io
- Paragon vs Boomi
- Paragon vs Browser Use
- Paragon vs Browserbase
- Paragon vs Celigo
- Paragon vs Census
- Paragon vs CrewAI


