Software · head to head
Achievers vs Greenhouse
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Achievers pricing is not published and requires a demo; Greenhouse core plan lacks talent discovery and contact lookups
- They diverge on capability: Achievers covers Peer-to-peer recognition, Greenhouse covers Applicant tracking.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Achievers and Greenhouse actually diverge.
| Attribute | Achievers | Greenhouse |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | subscription | quote |
| Founded | 2002 | 2012 |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), platforms (Web, Ios, Android, Api), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Achievers
- Peer-to-peer recognition
- Manager recognition
- Points-based rewards
- Marketplace rewards
- Pulse surveys
- Employee connections
- Analytics dashboard
- Values alignment
Only in Greenhouse
- Applicant tracking
- Interview scheduling
- Scorecard system
- Job board posting
- Candidate CRM
- Reporting & analytics
- Offer management
- EEO compliance
Both cover
- Slack
- GDPR
- Data encryption
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Achievers
- Employee recognitionnot Greenhouse
- Rewards programnot Greenhouse
- Engagement measurementnot Greenhouse
- Culture buildingnot Greenhouse
- Retention improvementnot Greenhouse
Greenhouse
- Applicant tracking system for structured hiringnot Achievers
- AI-powered interview notetaking and sourcingnot Achievers
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Achievers
- Pricing is not published and requires a demo
- Aimed at mid-market and enterprise organisations rather than small teams
- Sold as separate named modules, Recognize, Reward and Celebrate, so a full programme means more than one line on the quote
Greenhouse
- Core plan lacks talent discovery and contact lookups
- Core plan lacks email automation and applicant texting
- Plus plan lacks resume anonymisation and application limits
- Plus plan lacks audit logging and developer tools
- Pricing customised by hiring volume and company size, not published
- Only Pro tier offers audit logs and developer sandbox
Pricing, plan by plan
Achievers
On request- Recognize$undefined/month
- Peer-to-peer recognition
- Manager recognition
- Points & rewards
- Listen$undefined/month
- Engagement surveys
- Pulse surveys
- Analytics
- Connect$undefined/month
- Employee connections
- Interest groups
- Events
Greenhouse
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Greenhouse review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Achievers if
- You need peer-to-peer recognition.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android, Api.
- You also want manager recognition.
Choose Greenhouse if
- You need applicant tracking.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android, Api.
- You also want interview scheduling.
Questions people ask
- Is Achievers or Greenhouse better?
- Neither clearly leads. Achievers starts at On request and Greenhouse at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Achievers or Greenhouse?
- Achievers starts at On request and Greenhouse at On request.
- Does Achievers or Greenhouse run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, Ios, Android, Api, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- What is Achievers best used for?
- Achievers is most often used for employee recognition, rewards program, engagement measurement, culture building. Of those, employee recognition and rewards program are not what Greenhouse is typically brought in for.
- What can Achievers do that Greenhouse cannot?
- Achievers covers Peer-to-peer recognition, Manager recognition, Points-based rewards, Marketplace rewards. Greenhouse covers Applicant tracking, Interview scheduling, Scorecard system, Job board posting. Both handle Slack, GDPR, Data encryption.
Related pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Achievers vs BambooHR
- Achievers vs Workday
- Achievers vs Culture Amp
- Achievers vs Freshteam
- Achievers vs TINYpulse
- Achievers vs Zoho People
- Achievers vs 15Five
- Achievers vs Bonusly
- Achievers vs CharlieHR
- Achievers vs Kudos
- Achievers vs Lattice
- Achievers vs Personio
- Achievers vs Breathe HR
- Achievers vs Darwinbox
- Achievers vs Employment Hero
- Achievers vs greytHR
- Achievers vs HiBob
- Achievers vs Homebase
- Achievers vs Asana
- Achievers vs ClickUp
- Achievers vs Figma
- Achievers vs Linear
- Achievers vs Monday.com
- Achievers vs Notion
- Achievers vs Amplitude
- Achievers vs Datadog
- Achievers vs PostHog
- Achievers vs PyCharm
- Achievers vs Sketch
- Achievers vs Docker
- Achievers vs Netlify
- Achievers vs Okta
- Achievers vs Aha!
- Achievers vs Coda
- Achievers vs Dashlane
- Achievers vs GitHub
- Greenhouse vs BambooHR
- Greenhouse vs Workday
- Greenhouse vs Culture Amp
- Greenhouse vs Freshteam
- Greenhouse vs TINYpulse
- Greenhouse vs Zoho People
- Greenhouse vs 15Five
- Greenhouse vs Bonusly
- Greenhouse vs CharlieHR
- Greenhouse vs Kudos
- Greenhouse vs Lattice
- Greenhouse vs Personio
- Greenhouse vs Breathe HR
- Greenhouse vs Darwinbox
- Greenhouse vs Employment Hero
- Greenhouse vs greytHR
- Greenhouse vs HiBob
- Greenhouse vs Homebase
- Greenhouse vs Asana
- Greenhouse vs ClickUp
- Greenhouse vs Figma
- Greenhouse vs Linear
- Greenhouse vs Monday.com
- Greenhouse vs Notion
- Greenhouse vs Amplitude
- Greenhouse vs Datadog
- Greenhouse vs PostHog
- Greenhouse vs PyCharm
- Greenhouse vs Sketch
- Greenhouse vs Docker
- Greenhouse vs Netlify
- Greenhouse vs Okta
- Greenhouse vs Aha!
- Greenhouse vs Coda
- Greenhouse vs Dashlane
- Greenhouse vs GitHub


