Relativityvs
Everlaw


Everlaw: Cloud-native and generally reported as easier to learn, aimed at the same work

Ediscovery and legal data platform for large matters
As of 29 August 2026, Relativity's pricing is not published; the vendor quotes on request. The established enterprise ediscovery platform, used by large firms and corporate legal for the biggest matters. Softwr lists it under Legal. Relativity is available on Web, Self-hosted.
Overview
Relativity is an ediscovery and legal data platform for processing, reviewing and producing documents in litigation and investigations. It is the long-established enterprise option, widely deployed across large law firms, corporate legal departments and government. Its strength is scale and extensibility: very large document sets, a mature review workflow, and an ecosystem of third-party applications built on its platform. That ecosystem is also why it persists — firms build process around it, and process is harder to replace than software.
The honest half
Concrete and checkable, so you can decide whether any of them matter to you. This is the half of a review a vendor will not write about Relativity.
Cross-shopped
Each pairing was judged by two reviewers asking whether a buyer would genuinely weigh the two against each other. The ones that failed were deleted rather than published.


Everlaw: Cloud-native and generally reported as easier to learn, aimed at the same work


Logikcull: Self-service and far cheaper for small matters where Relativity is overkill
Capabilities
Large-scale processing
Handles document sets at the volumes big litigation produces
Review workflow
Coding, batching and quality control across large review teams
Analytics and active learning
Clustering and machine learning to prioritise review
Application ecosystem
Third-party tools built on the platform
Answered, with sources
Each answer names the page it came from, so you can check it rather than take our word for it.
It does not publish rates. Ediscovery is generally billed on data volume and users, quoted per matter or organisation.
No. Corporate legal departments and government agencies use it for investigations as well as litigation.
In practice yes. Relativity certification is a recognised specialism, and that staffing cost is part of the total.
Keep looking
Cloud e-discovery priced by data volume, with review, legal hold and case preparation in one platform
Machine learning contract analysis for review, negotiation and compliance
Thomson Reuters legal research platform, priced per seat with tiers from Edge to Advantage and negotiated enterprise contracts above 10 attorneys
AI research and drafting platform for large law firms, sold on enterprise-only seat pricing with no self-service tier and reported contracts from roughly $50,000 to $360,000 a year
Document and email management for law firms and professional services
Document lifecycle and contract intelligence platform for law firms, built through a decade of acquisitions including Kira Systems, Workshare and Doxly
Configurable case management for plaintiff litigation, intake and mass tort firms
Case management built specifically for plaintiff personal injury firms
Legal research database sold per seat per practice area, with contract value set by firm size and content modules rather than a list price
Automated cookie scanning and consent banner for websites, owned by Usercentrics
Immigration case management with automated USCIS and DOL form population from a single client intake questionnaire
Legal CRM, client intake and marketing automation platform with a 3-user minimum that sets an effective entry floor of roughly $447 a month
Thomson Reuters legal research platform, priced per seat with tiers from Edge to Advantage and negotiated enterprise contracts above 10 attorneys
AI research and drafting platform for large law firms, sold on enterprise-only seat pricing with no self-service tier and reported contracts from roughly $50,000 to $360,000 a year
Case management built specifically for plaintiff personal injury firms
Softwr does not host reviews and shows no star rating for Relativity, because a rating we did not collect is not ours to publish. What is here is the pricing and platform detail from the vendor’s own pages, limitations we could state concretely, and alternatives a reviewer confirmed people weigh against it. Tell us if any of it is wrong.
What people switch to, and what they give up
Every tier, and where the cost actually lands
Put it head to head with anything we hold
Its rating, and an embed for your own site
Legal research database sold per seat per practice area, with contract value set by firm size and content modules rather than a list price
quoteLegal CRM, client intake and marketing automation platform with a 3-user minimum that sets an effective entry floor of roughly $447 a month
Per user per month, with a 3-user minimum on the entry planDocument lifecycle and contract intelligence platform for law firms, built through a decade of acquisitions including Kira Systems, Workshare and Doxly
quoteThomson Reuters legal research platform, priced per seat with tiers from Edge to Advantage and negotiated enterprise contracts above 10 attorneys
quoteImmigration case management with automated USCIS and DOL form population from a single client intake questionnaire
Per user per monthLegal practice management with billing and time tracking, tiered from matter basics to full legal accounting
Per user per monthAI research and drafting platform for large law firms, sold on enterprise-only seat pricing with no self-service tier and reported contracts from roughly $50,000 to $360,000 a year
quoteConfigurable legal practice and accounting management platform sold as two separate products, priced per user with no published rate
Per user per month