Harvey

AI research and drafting platform for large law firms, sold on enterprise-only seat pricing with no self-service tier and reported contracts from roughly $50,000 to $360,000 a year

As of 1 September 2026, Harvey's pricing is not published; the vendor quotes on request. A legal AI product built for BigLaw and in-house legal departments rather than solo or small-firm practitioners, with complete pricing opacity: there is no published rate, no self-service signup, and reported per-seat costs of roughly $1,000 to $2,000 a month depending on usage tier. Softwr lists it under Legal. Harvey is made by Harvey AI, available on Web.

Visit siteVisit Harvey

Overview

What Harvey does

Harvey provides AI-assisted legal research, drafting, contract analysis and due diligence workflows, trained and tuned specifically on legal documents and citation conventions rather than general-purpose model output. It integrates with a firm document management system and offers workflow-specific tools rather than a single chat interface, aimed at replicating tasks associate lawyers and paralegals currently perform manually. The commercial reality is that Harvey does not sell to individual lawyers or small firms in any meaningful way. Pricing is enterprise-only, quoted per seat with modular bundling, and industry reporting places per-seat cost at roughly $1,000 to $1,200 a month for standard use and $1,200 to $2,000-plus for unlimited use, with 25-seat minimums common. Reported entry-level enterprise deals start around $360,000 a year, and third-party buyer reports describe a median contract near $175,000 a year for BigLaw firms, with additional platform fees on top of licence cost that Harvey treats as standard rather than optional at scale. Buyers are AmLaw 200 and larger global firms and large corporate legal departments; the company reports it has reached roughly $190 million in annualised revenue and serves half of the AmLaw 100. The trade-off for anyone smaller is stark: Harvey is simply not sized, priced or sold for a small or mid-size firm, and evaluating it against a solo-friendly tool like Docketwise or a mid-market product like Spellbook is comparing different markets entirely.

What people use it for

An AmLaw 100 or 200 firm wanting AI-assisted due diligence review across large contract sets
A large corporate legal department needing firm-tuned drafting on its own precedent library
A litigation practice wanting AI research assistance integrated directly with its document management system
A firm large enough to absorb a 25-seat minimum and enterprise contract cost, evaluating AI tools at BigLaw scale

Where it falls short

Concrete and checkable, so you can decide whether any of them matter to you. This is the half of a review a vendor will not write about Harvey.

There is no published pricing anywhere, and no self-service tier at all, so even qualifying for a quote requires an enterprise sales process most small and mid-size firms cannot justify starting.
25-seat minimums put it structurally out of reach for solo, boutique and most mid-size firms regardless of interest.
Reported additional platform fees on top of the headline per-seat licence mean the effective total cost is materially higher than the quoted seat price alone suggests.
As a well-funded, fast-growing AI vendor, its product and pricing model are still evolving quickly, which is a real risk for a firm signing a multi-year enterprise contract now.
Being trained and marketed specifically for BigLaw workflows means smaller firms evaluating it are comparing themselves against a product that was not built or priced with them in mind.

Cross-shopped

What people choose instead of Harvey

Each pairing was judged by two reviewers asking whether a buyer would genuinely weigh the two against each other. The ones that failed were deleted rather than published.

Harveyvs
Spellbook
Spellbook: If you want AI contract drafting inside Word at a scale and price appropriate for a mid-size firm rather than BigLaw
Harveyvs
Relativity
Relativity: If your actual need is e-discovery review rather than AI drafting and research
Harveyvs
Westlaw
Westlaw: If core legal research, not AI drafting, is the priority and budget does not support an enterprise AI contract

Pricing

What Harvey costs

Taken from the vendor's own pricing page. Prices move, so check before you buy.

Enterprise (BigLaw)

On request

No self-service signup, quote-only via sales
25-seat minimums commonly reported
Reported per-seat cost roughly $1,000-2,000/month depending on usage tier
Reported entry contracts from around $360,000/year; median reported around $175,000/year
Additional platform fees on top of licence cost are common at scale

Capabilities

Features

Legal research assistant
AI-assisted case law and statute research with citation support
Contract analysis
Automated review and issue-spotting across contract sets, aimed at due diligence workflows
Document drafting
Draft generation for memos, briefs and correspondence from firm-specific templates and precedent
Workflow-specific tools
Task-built modules (research, drafting, review) rather than a single general chat interface
DMS integration
Connects to firm document management systems such as iManage and NetDocuments
Firm-tuned deployment
Custom tuning on a firm own precedent and style during enterprise onboarding

Answered, with sources

Questions people ask

Each answer names the page it came from, so you can check it rather than take our word for it.

Can a small firm buy Harvey?

In practice, no. There is no self-service tier, and reported 25-seat minimums and six-figure contract values put it out of reach for most small and mid-size firms.

How much does Harvey actually cost?

Nothing is published. Third-party reporting estimates $1,000-2,000 per seat per month and enterprise contracts from roughly $360,000 to over $1.5 million a year including platform fees.

Does Harvey replace Westlaw or LexisNexis?

No. It is an AI research, drafting and review layer, typically deployed alongside rather than instead of a primary legal research database.

Keep looking

Where to go from Harvey

Best Legal software for

Compare Harvey with

Other Legal software

Westlaw
Thomson Reuters legal research platform, priced per seat with tiers from Edge to Advantage and negotiated enterprise contracts above 10 attorneys
Pricing on request11 researched notes
Litera
Document lifecycle and contract intelligence platform for law firms, built through a decade of acquisitions including Kira Systems, Workshare and Doxly
Pricing on request11 researched notes
Spellbook
Contract drafting and review assistant inside Microsoft Word
Pricing on request11 researched notes
Relativity
Ediscovery and legal data platform for large matters
Pricing on request8 researched notes
LexisNexis
Legal research database sold per seat per practice area, with contract value set by firm size and content modules rather than a list price
Pricing on request11 researched notes
Luminance
Machine learning contract analysis for review, negotiation and compliance
Pricing on request11 researched notes
Lawmatics
Legal CRM, client intake and marketing automation platform with a 3-user minimum that sets an effective entry floor of roughly $447 a month
11 researched notes
Actionstep
Configurable legal practice and accounting management platform sold as two separate products, priced per user with no published rate
11 researched notes
iubenda
Published-price privacy compliance: certified consent banner, privacy policy and cookie policy from under 60 euros a year
From €59.88/yr12 researched notes
CosmoLex
Practice management with a full legal general ledger and trust accounting built in
From $89/mo11 researched notes
CASEpeer
Case management built specifically for plaintiff personal injury firms
From $79/mo11 researched notes
Litify
Legal case and matter management built natively on Salesforce
Pricing on request11 researched notes
Intapp
Risk, compliance and business intake software for professional services firms
Pricing on request11 researched notes
Rocket Matter
Legal practice management with billing and time tracking, tiered from matter basics to full legal accounting
11 researched notes
Secure Privacy
Consent management and website privacy compliance priced per domain by monthly consent volume
Free, then $15/mo13 researched notes
Tabs3
Billing, trust and general ledger accounting for small and mid-sized US law firms
From $69/mo11 researched notes
Litera
Document lifecycle and contract intelligence platform for law firms, built through a decade of acquisitions including Kira Systems, Workshare and Doxly
Pricing on request11 researched notes
Litify
Legal case and matter management built natively on Salesforce
Pricing on request11 researched notes

Softwr does not host reviews and shows no star rating for Harvey, because a rating we did not collect is not ours to publish. What is here is the pricing and platform detail from the vendor’s own pages, limitations we could state concretely, and alternatives a reviewer confirmed people weigh against it. Tell us if any of it is wrong.

Best Legal software alternatives

View all Legal software