Softwr

Real Estate · head to head

TenantCloud vs Yardi Voyager

TenantCloud logo

TenantCloud

Real Estate

Low-cost property management aimed at self-managing landlords rather than third-party managers

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Yardi Voyager logo

Yardi Voyager

Real Estate

Property management and accounting platform for institutional residential and commercial portfolios

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: TenantCloud the accounting is categorised income and expense rather than a double entry general ledger, so it will not support trust accounting or the owner statements a licensed third-party manager has to produce.; Yardi Voyager implementation frequently costs as much as or more than the first year of licence fees, and the contract clock usually starts before the portfolio is live.
  • They diverge on capability: TenantCloud covers Unit-banded plans, Yardi Voyager covers Full property accounting.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which TenantCloud and Yardi Voyager actually diverge.

Attributes where TenantCloud and Yardi Voyager differ
AttributeTenantCloudYardi Voyager
Pricing modelPer month by unit countquote

Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), platforms (Web, iOS, Android), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Real Estate).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in TenantCloud

  • Unit-banded plans
  • Rent collection
  • Listing syndication
  • Tenant screening
  • Maintenance requests
  • Income and expense tracking
  • Lease documents and e-signature

Only in Yardi Voyager

  • Full property accounting
  • Multi-asset support
  • RentCafe
  • Budgeting and forecasting
  • Compliance modules
  • Yardi payment processing

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

TenantCloud

  • A landlord with six to thirty units who wants rent by ACH, receipts and a tax-ready expense record without paying management-suite pricesnot Yardi Voyager
  • Someone inheriting a small portfolio who needs leases, applications and screening in one place from a standing startnot Yardi Voyager
  • A part-time landlord who wants tenants to submit maintenance requests through an application rather than by text messagenot Yardi Voyager
  • Testing whether online rent collection improves on-time payment before committing to a full property management platformnot Yardi Voyager

Yardi Voyager

  • An owner or fund manager that must produce audited investor reporting from the same system that runs operationsnot TenantCloud
  • A mixed portfolio of commercial and residential assets that would otherwise need two systemsnot TenantCloud
  • An affordable housing operator needing certification and regulatory compliance workflow built innot TenantCloud
  • A third-party manager onboarding client portfolios that already report on Yardinot TenantCloud

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

TenantCloud

  • The accounting is categorised income and expense rather than a double entry general ledger, so it will not support trust accounting or the owner statements a licensed third-party manager has to produce.
  • Plans are banded by unit count, which means crossing a band boundary by a single unit steps the monthly bill up rather than nudging it, and the bands are where most of the vendor pricing power sits.
  • A large share of the vendor economics comes from screening fees, insurance commissions and payment processing rather than the subscription, so the true annual cost depends on volume you cannot see when you sign up.
  • Owner reporting is thin because the product assumes the landlord is the owner, which makes it unsuitable the moment you start managing property for someone else.
  • Support and product depth trail Buildium and AppFolio noticeably, and the escape route when you outgrow it is a migration to a different vendor rather than an upgrade path within this one.

Yardi Voyager

  • Implementation frequently costs as much as or more than the first year of licence fees, and the contract clock usually starts before the portfolio is live.
  • Module-based pricing means the quoted per-unit rate covers far less than most operators assume, and adding resident portals, procurement or utility billing repeatedly reopens the budget.
  • Reporting beyond the standard set often requires Yardi consultants or a specialist partner, so internal teams stay dependent on paid services for routine changes.
  • Parts of the interface remain dense and dated, which lengthens onboarding for site staff and drives some operators to buy a separate front-end product.
  • Exporting a full portfolio history to another platform is slow and costly, so switching decisions are effectively made once a decade rather than at each renewal.

Pricing, plan by plan

TenantCloud

On request
  • Starter$undefined/month
    • Banded by unit count
    • Rent collection and online applications
    • Maintenance requests
  • Growth$undefined/month
    • Higher unit band
    • Listing syndication
    • Custom lease templates
  • Pro$undefined/month
    • Highest published unit band
    • Team access
    • Advanced reporting
  • Business$undefined/year
    • Quoted above the published bands
    • Multiple portfolios
    • Onboarding assistance

Yardi Voyager

On request
  • Yardi Voyager$undefined/year
    • Quoted per unit per month with annual minimums
    • Each module such as RentCafe, procurement or utility billing priced separately
    • Implementation, data migration and training charged as professional services

Which should you pick?

Choose TenantCloud if

  • You need unit-banded plans.
  • You work on Web, iOS, Android.
  • You also want rent collection.
TenantCloud review

Choose Yardi Voyager if

  • You need full property accounting.
  • You work on Web, iOS, Android.
  • You also want multi-asset support.
Yardi Voyager review

Questions people ask

Is TenantCloud or Yardi Voyager better?
Neither clearly leads. TenantCloud starts at On request and Yardi Voyager at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, TenantCloud or Yardi Voyager?
TenantCloud starts at On request and Yardi Voyager at On request.
Does TenantCloud or Yardi Voyager run on more platforms?
Both run on Web, iOS, Android, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
What is TenantCloud best used for?
TenantCloud is most often used for a landlord with six to thirty units who wants rent by ach, receipts and a tax-ready expense record without paying management-suite prices, someone inheriting a small portfolio who needs leases, applications and screening in one place from a standing start, a part-time landlord who wants tenants to submit maintenance requests through an application rather than by text message, testing whether online rent collection improves on-time payment before committing to a full property management platform. Of those, a landlord with six to thirty units who wants rent by ach, receipts and a tax-ready expense record without paying management-suite prices and someone inheriting a small portfolio who needs leases, applications and screening in one place from a standing start are not what Yardi Voyager is typically brought in for.
What can TenantCloud do that Yardi Voyager cannot?
TenantCloud covers Unit-banded plans, Rent collection, Listing syndication, Tenant screening. Yardi Voyager covers Full property accounting, Multi-asset support, RentCafe, Budgeting and forecasting.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

TenantCloud: Can I use it to manage property for other owners?

Not properly. There is no trust accounting and owner statements are limited, so a licensed manager holding client money should look at Buildium or Rent Manager.

Yardi Voyager: Does Yardi publish Voyager pricing?

No. Only Breeze, the small portfolio product, has published per-unit rates. Voyager is quoted per unit per module against annual minimums.

TenantCloud: Who pays for tenant screening?

Usually the applicant, though the landlord can absorb it. The screening fee is a separate charge from the subscription and is part of how the vendor earns.

Yardi Voyager: How long does implementation take?

Months rather than weeks for anything beyond a small single-asset-class portfolio, and professional services are charged separately.

TenantCloud: What happens when I cross a unit band?

The monthly price steps to the next band immediately, so a portfolio sitting one unit over a boundary pays for headroom it is not using.

Yardi Voyager: Is Voyager suitable under 1,000 units?

Usually not. Yardi steers smaller portfolios to Breeze or Breeze Premier, and the Voyager cost structure rarely justifies itself at that size.

TenantCloud: Does it handle commercial units?

Only in a basic way. There is no CAM reconciliation or commercial escalation handling.

Share

Related pages

More on TenantCloud

More on Yardi Voyager

Keep looking

Other head to heads