Backup · head to head
CloudCasa vs Trilio

CloudCasa
Backup
SaaS Kubernetes backup and migration with published per-node pricing
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Trilio
Backup
Backup and recovery for OpenStack, Kubernetes and Red Hat Virtualization
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: CloudCasa at $69 per node per month, a fifty-node estate costs over forty thousand dollars a year at list, which is more than many teams expect from a product marketed on its free tier.; Trilio coverage is deliberately narrow, so a mixed estate with VMware and physical servers needs a second backup product and two sets of restore procedures.
- They diverge on capability: CloudCasa covers SaaS control plane, Trilio covers OpenStack backup.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which CloudCasa and Trilio actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Backup).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in CloudCasa
- SaaS control plane
- Free tier
- Cross-cluster restore
- Managed service support
- Bring your own storage
- Velero compatibility
Only in Trilio
- OpenStack backup
- Kubernetes backup
- OpenShift Virtualization
- Open format backups
- Incremental forever
- Self-service restore
- Free basic edition
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
CloudCasa
- A team wanting Kubernetes backup running this afternoon without deploying and maintaining a backup servernot Trilio
- A small cluster of five nodes or fewer that needs real backup at no licence costnot Trilio
- An organisation running Velero already and wanting a managed control plane and catalogue over the topnot Trilio
- Migrating workloads between EKS and AKS where the tool must restore into a different distributionnot Trilio
Trilio
- A telco running an OpenStack cloud whose incumbent backup vendor supports it only through generic agentsnot CloudCasa
- An organisation migrating virtual machines from VMware to OpenShift Virtualization and needing protection on the new platform from day onenot CloudCasa
- A research institution protecting tenant workloads where each tenant should restore its own data without a ticketnot CloudCasa
- A platform team wanting to evaluate Kubernetes backup properly on ten nodes before committing budgetnot CloudCasa
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
CloudCasa
- At $69 per node per month, a fifty-node estate costs over forty thousand dollars a year at list, which is more than many teams expect from a product marketed on its free tier.
- The control plane is SaaS, so cluster metadata and backup catalogues sit with the vendor, which rules it out where policy prohibits external services holding infrastructure detail.
- Per-node pricing punishes clusters built from many small nodes, so the licensing metric can push architecture decisions in directions the platform team would not otherwise choose.
- The free tier stops at five nodes with no intermediate step, so growth from five to six nodes moves you from nothing to a full commercial rate.
- Catalogic is a much smaller vendor than Veeam or Commvault, which matters for procurement risk assessments and for long-term support commitments on a system you may depend on for years.
Trilio
- Coverage is deliberately narrow, so a mixed estate with VMware and physical servers needs a second backup product and two sets of restore procedures.
- Trilio is a small vendor next to the backup incumbents, and buyers with ten year retention obligations should assess the risk of the company being acquired or wound down.
- Enterprise pricing is per node or per virtual machine and is not published, which makes it hard to compare against per-terabyte competitors without going through sales.
- The free basic edition stops at ten nodes with community support only, so the step from evaluation to production is a full commercial negotiation rather than a tier upgrade.
- Restore performance depends on the object storage or NFS target you supply, and egress charges from a cloud object store during a large recovery sit outside the vendor quote entirely.
Pricing, plan by plan
CloudCasa
Free- BasicFree
- Up to 5 nodes at no cost
- Daily backup schedules for clusters and namespaces
- Basic and advanced restore options
- CloudCasa Pro$69/month
- Per node per month
- Advanced backup policies
- Application-aware backups
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Volume pricing negotiated
- Dedicated support and SLAs
- Custom retention and residency arrangements
Trilio
Free- Basic EditionFree
- Up to ten nodes
- No time limit
- Community support only
- Enterprise Edition$undefined/year
- Priced per node or per virtual machine annually
- No scale limits
- OpenStack, Kubernetes, OpenShift and Red Hat Virtualization
Which should you pick?
Choose CloudCasa if
- You need saas control plane.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Kubernetes, Web.
- You also want free tier.
Choose Trilio if
- You need openstack backup.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Web.
- You also want kubernetes backup.
Questions people ask
- Is CloudCasa or Trilio better?
- Neither clearly leads. CloudCasa starts at Free and Trilio at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, CloudCasa or Trilio?
- CloudCasa starts at Free and Trilio at Free.
- Does CloudCasa or Trilio run on more platforms?
- CloudCasa runs on Kubernetes, Web. Trilio runs on Linux, Web.
- Can I use CloudCasa for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is CloudCasa best used for?
- CloudCasa is most often used for a team wanting kubernetes backup running this afternoon without deploying and maintaining a backup server, a small cluster of five nodes or fewer that needs real backup at no licence cost, an organisation running velero already and wanting a managed control plane and catalogue over the top, migrating workloads between eks and aks where the tool must restore into a different distribution. Of those, a team wanting kubernetes backup running this afternoon without deploying and maintaining a backup server and a small cluster of five nodes or fewer that needs real backup at no licence cost are not what Trilio is typically brought in for.
- What can CloudCasa do that Trilio cannot?
- CloudCasa covers SaaS control plane, Free tier, Cross-cluster restore, Managed service support. Trilio covers OpenStack backup, Kubernetes backup, OpenShift Virtualization, Open format backups.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
CloudCasa: What does it cost?
Free for up to five nodes. CloudCasa Pro is $69 per node per month. Enterprise arrangements are negotiated.
Trilio: Is the free edition production usable?
It is functionally complete up to ten nodes with community support only. Use it to evaluate, but understand that production incidents have no vendor behind them at that tier.
CloudCasa: Where does the backup data go?
Typically to your own S3-compatible bucket. The vendor hosts the control plane and catalogue, not necessarily your data.
Trilio: Does it support OpenShift Virtualization?
Yes, which is the main reason it appears on shortlists for organisations moving virtual machines off VMware.
CloudCasa: Does it work with Velero?
Yes. It can manage existing Velero installations, which makes it a lower-friction upgrade than a rip and replace.
Trilio: Where are backups stored?
On NFS or S3-compatible object storage you provide, in an open format rather than a proprietary vendor container.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- CloudCasa vs Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes
- CloudCasa vs Rubrik Cloud Data Management
- CloudCasa vs HYCU
- CloudCasa vs Portworx Backup
- CloudCasa vs Velero
- CloudCasa vs BDRShield
- CloudCasa vs Druva Data Resiliency Cloud
- CloudCasa vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- CloudCasa vs Redstor
- CloudCasa vs AvePoint Cloud Backup
- CloudCasa vs Spanning Backup
- CloudCasa vs Dell EMC NetWorker
- CloudCasa vs EaseUS Todo Backup
- CloudCasa vs IBM Storage Protect
- CloudCasa vs Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery
- CloudCasa vs Macrium Reflect
- CloudCasa vs Commvault Complete Data Protection
- CloudCasa vs Kopia
- CloudCasa vs Proxmox Backup Server
- CloudCasa vs rustic
- CloudCasa vs HPE StoreOnce
- CloudCasa vs MSP360 Backup
- CloudCasa vs N-able Backup
- CloudCasa vs OwnBackup
- Trilio vs Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes
- Trilio vs Rubrik Cloud Data Management
- Trilio vs HYCU
- Trilio vs Portworx Backup
- Trilio vs Velero
- Trilio vs BDRShield
- Trilio vs Druva Data Resiliency Cloud
- Trilio vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- Trilio vs Redstor
- Trilio vs AvePoint Cloud Backup
- Trilio vs Spanning Backup
- Trilio vs Dell EMC NetWorker
- Trilio vs EaseUS Todo Backup
- Trilio vs IBM Storage Protect
- Trilio vs Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery
- Trilio vs Macrium Reflect
- Trilio vs Commvault Complete Data Protection
- Trilio vs Kopia
- Trilio vs Proxmox Backup Server
- Trilio vs rustic
- Trilio vs HPE StoreOnce
- Trilio vs MSP360 Backup
- Trilio vs N-able Backup
- Trilio vs OwnBackup
