Cybersecurity · head to head
Chainguard vs Transmit Security

Chainguard
Cybersecurity
Secure-by-default open source software with hardened container images and libraries
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Transmit Security
Cybersecurity
Customer identity platform built around passwordless and fraud signals
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Chainguard has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Chainguard containers Catalog at 19,000 USD/year expensive for teams under 10 people; Transmit Security pricing is not published, so it cannot be compared early against competitors that post per monthly active user rates, and the eventual quote often mixes per-user and per-transaction units.
- They diverge on capability: Chainguard covers Hardened container images, Transmit Security covers Passwordless authentication.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Chainguard and Transmit Security actually diverge.
| Attribute | Chainguard | Transmit Security |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | Licensing by artifact type and team size | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Cloud, Container, VM | Web, iOS, Android |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Chainguard
- Hardened container images
- CVE remediation SLA
- SLSA L2/L3 builds
- Sigstore signatures
- SBOM generation
- Language libraries
- VM images
- Artifact scanning
Only in Transmit Security
- Passwordless authentication
- Detection and response
- Identity verification
- Orchestration
- Account recovery
- Bot and automation detection
- Composable APIs
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Chainguard
- Deploying hardened container images with minimal attack surfacenot Transmit Security
- Meeting supply chain security requirements for regulated industriesnot Transmit Security
- Reducing CVE exposure with contractual remediation guaranteesnot Transmit Security
- Building secure language packages with automatic backportsnot Transmit Security
- Verifying artifact provenance with Sigstore signaturesnot Transmit Security
Transmit Security
- A bank moving a consumer base off passwords to passkeys without losing customers at the migration stepnot Chainguard
- An insurer whose account recovery flow is the main account takeover route and needs risk scoring inside itnot Chainguard
- A retailer that wants bot detection at login rather than only at checkoutnot Chainguard
- An organisation replacing an in-house customer login system that has become an unfunded engineering liabilitynot Chainguard
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Chainguard
- Containers Catalog at 19,000 USD/year expensive for teams under 10 people
- Per-image pricing for containers requires custom quotes with no transparency
- Free tier limited to 5 container images for testing
- Libraries pricing by ecosystem and developer count lacks transparent per-developer cost
- VM image catalog pricing opacity makes cost estimation difficult
Transmit Security
- Pricing is not published, so it cannot be compared early against competitors that post per monthly active user rates, and the eventual quote often mixes per-user and per-transaction units.
- Migrating a live consumer identity base is a high risk project, and credential migration constraints mean some users must re-register, which shows up as measurable churn.
- The vendor is smaller than the identity incumbents, so the partner and systems integrator pool is thinner and staffing a large programme is harder.
- Workforce identity is not the focus, so an organisation wanting one vendor for employees and customers will still run two platforms.
- The fraud detection value depends on traffic volume feeding the models, so a smaller deployment gets less benefit from exactly the capability that justified choosing it over a plain identity provider.
Pricing, plan by plan
Chainguard
Free- Free TierFree
- Five container images to test and deploy
- Containers Per-Image$undefined/custom
- Licensed by quantity and type
- Base images, application images, AI/ML images, FIPS variants
- Custom pricing per image
- Containers Catalog$19000/year
- For 10-person engineering teams
- 2,000+ container images
- Contractual CVE remediation SLAs
- Libraries Licensing$undefined/custom
- Licensed by ecosystem (Python, Java, JavaScript)
- Licensed by developer count
- Unlimited pulls with no metering
Transmit Security
On request- Transmit Security Platform$undefined/year
- Priced per monthly active user or per transaction by service
- Services licensed individually or as a platform
- Free developer tier for evaluation
Which should you pick?
Choose Chainguard if
- You need hardened container images.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, Container, VM.
- You also want cve remediation sla.
Choose Transmit Security if
- You need passwordless authentication.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want detection and response.
Questions people ask
- Is Chainguard or Transmit Security better?
- Neither clearly leads. Chainguard starts at Free and Transmit Security at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Chainguard or Transmit Security?
- Chainguard has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Chainguard and On request for Transmit Security.
- Does Chainguard or Transmit Security run on more platforms?
- Chainguard runs on Cloud, Container, VM. Transmit Security runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- Can I use Chainguard for free?
- Yes. Chainguard has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Transmit Security starts at On request.
- What is Chainguard best used for?
- Chainguard is most often used for deploying hardened container images with minimal attack surface, meeting supply chain security requirements for regulated industries, reducing cve exposure with contractual remediation guarantees, building secure language packages with automatic backports. Of those, deploying hardened container images with minimal attack surface and meeting supply chain security requirements for regulated industries are not what Transmit Security is typically brought in for.
- What can Chainguard do that Transmit Security cannot?
- Chainguard covers Hardened container images, CVE remediation SLA, SLSA L2/L3 builds, Sigstore signatures. Transmit Security covers Passwordless authentication, Detection and response, Identity verification, Orchestration.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Chainguard: How much is the Chainguard Containers Catalog?
The Containers Catalog is 19,000 USD per year for 10-person engineering teams, providing access to 2,000+ hardened container images.
SourceTransmit Security: Do we have to replace our existing identity provider?
No. The services are composable, so detection and response or verification can be adopted alongside an existing provider such as Okta or Entra ID.
Chainguard: What SLAs does Chainguard offer?
Chainguard provides contractual CVE remediation SLAs: 7 days for critical vulnerabilities, 14 days for high/medium/low severity, all with priority support.
SourceTransmit Security: Is fraud detection an extra licence?
It is a separate service, but it is designed to run inside the authentication flow rather than as a bolted-on second vendor. Confirm which services are in your quote.
Chainguard: Can I try Chainguard before purchasing?
Yes. The free tier includes five container images for testing and deployment, allowing hands-on evaluation.
SourceTransmit Security: Is there a way to try it?
Yes, a free developer tier exists for evaluation, though production use is an enterprise agreement.
Related pages
More on Transmit Security
Other head to heads
- Chainguard vs Snyk
- Chainguard vs Trivy
- Chainguard vs Doppler
- Chainguard vs Infisical
- Chainguard vs Grype
- Chainguard vs Arnica
- Chainguard vs HashiCorp Vault
- Chainguard vs Bitwarden
- Chainguard vs Semgrep
- Chainguard vs Authelia
- Chainguard vs Endor Labs
- Chainguard vs Tenable
- Chainguard vs Hanwha Vision
- Chainguard vs Idira
- Chainguard vs IVPN
- Chainguard vs Logto
- Chainguard vs Malwarebytes
- Chainguard vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Chainguard vs Descope
- Chainguard vs NICE Actimize
- Chainguard vs Beyond Identity
- Chainguard vs Sardine
- Chainguard vs Feedzai
- Chainguard vs Socure
- Chainguard vs Unit21
- Chainguard vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Chainguard vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Chainguard vs Ping Identity
- Chainguard vs Stytch
- Chainguard vs Rhombus Systems
- Chainguard vs Spot AI
- Chainguard vs Syft
- Chainguard vs ThetaRay
- Chainguard vs Trulioo
- Transmit Security vs Snyk
- Transmit Security vs Trivy
- Transmit Security vs Doppler
- Transmit Security vs Infisical
- Transmit Security vs Grype
- Transmit Security vs Arnica
- Transmit Security vs HashiCorp Vault
- Transmit Security vs Bitwarden
- Transmit Security vs Semgrep
- Transmit Security vs Authelia
- Transmit Security vs Endor Labs
- Transmit Security vs Tenable
- Transmit Security vs Hanwha Vision
- Transmit Security vs Idira
- Transmit Security vs IVPN
- Transmit Security vs Logto
- Transmit Security vs Malwarebytes
- Transmit Security vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Transmit Security vs Descope
- Transmit Security vs NICE Actimize
- Transmit Security vs Beyond Identity
- Transmit Security vs Sardine
- Transmit Security vs Feedzai
- Transmit Security vs Socure
- Transmit Security vs Unit21
- Transmit Security vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Transmit Security vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Transmit Security vs Ping Identity
- Transmit Security vs Stytch
- Transmit Security vs Rhombus Systems
- Transmit Security vs Spot AI
- Transmit Security vs Syft
- Transmit Security vs ThetaRay
- Transmit Security vs Trulioo
