Healthcare · head to head
TheraNest vs Visage Imaging

TheraNest
Healthcare
Mental health EHR and practice management priced per therapist
- From
- $29/month
- Rated
- -

Visage Imaging
Healthcare
Server-side streaming PACS built for radiologists reading very large studies over thin connections
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: TheraNest the Essentials plan includes no insurance claims at all, so any practice that bills a payer is effectively on the 59 USD tier or above and the advertised 29 USD entry price does not apply to it.; Visage Imaging pricing is per exam against a minimum annual volume, so an organisation whose imaging activity is flat pays a floor while a growing one sees the software line rise every year rather than amortise.
- They diverge on capability: TheraNest covers Progress notes and treatment plans, Visage Imaging covers Server-side rendering.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which TheraNest and Visage Imaging actually diverge.
| Attribute | TheraNest | Visage Imaging |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $29/month | On request |
| Pricing model | Per user per month | quote |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Windows, macOS, Web, iOS, Cloud |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Healthcare).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in TheraNest
- Progress notes and treatment plans
- Insurance claims
- Client portal
- Telehealth
- Group and family sessions
- Payroll and staff reporting
Only in Visage Imaging
- Server-side rendering
- One Viewer
- Native multi-dimensional tools
- Digital breast tomosynthesis reading
- Open archive
- Cloud PACS operations
- AI accelerator
- On the fly patient jacket
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
TheraNest
- A solo therapist who needs a HIPAA aligned note and scheduling system and does not bill insurance, where the 29 USD entry tier is genuinely sufficientnot Visage Imaging
- A group practice of six to twenty clinicians that wants per clinician productivity and payroll reporting without buying a separate practice management layernot Visage Imaging
- A practice moving off paper or a general purpose calendar that needs a client portal for intake forms and consent signaturesnot Visage Imaging
- A behavioural health organisation that bills a steady volume of insurance claims each month and can size the Advanced allowance against its actual claim countnot Visage Imaging
Visage Imaging
- An academic health system whose radiologists read from home and cannot tolerate a thousand slice CT taking minutes to opennot TheraNest
- A breast imaging service moving to tomosynthesis where study sizes have made the existing PACS unusable at volumenot TheraNest
- A teleradiology group covering many client sites that needs one viewer rather than a client-specific workstation per contractnot TheraNest
- A health system mid migration that needs priors from three legacy archives assembled into one patient jacket before the data move finishesnot TheraNest
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
TheraNest
- The Essentials plan includes no insurance claims at all, so any practice that bills a payer is effectively on the 59 USD tier or above and the advertised 29 USD entry price does not apply to it.
- Telehealth is only in the Premier plan, so a practice that wants video sessions pays 89 USD per therapist per month even if it needs nothing else from that tier.
- An annual AMA CPT licence fee is billed separately each December on top of subscription cost, which surprises practices that budgeted only the monthly figure.
- Additional administrative users are chargeable, so a practice with front desk and billing staff who never see clients still pays 19 to 29 USD per head for people who generate no revenue.
- The product sits inside a consolidated portfolio that has already renamed the parent company from Therapy Brands to Ensora Health, and product investment in a portfolio is directed by the owner rather than by this product line, so roadmap commitments are worth less than they would be from a single product vendor.
Visage Imaging
- Pricing is per exam against a minimum annual volume, so an organisation whose imaging activity is flat pays a floor while a growing one sees the software line rise every year rather than amortise.
- Module breadth outside radiology is narrower than at Sectra or the large modality vendors, so a group planning to digitise pathology on the same platform will not find it here.
- Server-side rendering shifts the cost to central infrastructure, so the saving on radiologist workstations is partly offset by what you spend on servers or cloud compute.
- Pro Medicus concentrates on very large contracts, and smaller imaging groups report long sales cycles and little appetite from the vendor for deals below a certain volume.
- Diagnostic AI is third party, surfaced through the accelerator framework rather than developed in house, so algorithm licensing, validation and monitoring remain the buyer problem.
Pricing, plan by plan
TheraNest
$29/month- Essentials$29/month
- Per therapist
- Scheduling and client portal
- HIPAA aligned notes and documentation
- Advanced$59/month
- Per therapist
- 30 insurance claims per month included
- Custom forms
- Premier$89/month
- Per therapist
- Unlimited insurance claims
- Billing automation
Visage Imaging
On request- Visage 7 enterprise contract$undefined/year
- Transaction pricing per exam with a minimum annual volume commitment
- Seven to ten year terms typical for health system contracts
- Contract totals for major deals are disclosed by Pro Medicus to the ASX
Which should you pick?
Choose TheraNest if
- You need progress notes and treatment plans.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want insurance claims.
Choose Visage Imaging if
- You need server-side rendering.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Web, iOS, Cloud.
- You also want one viewer.
Questions people ask
- Is TheraNest or Visage Imaging better?
- Neither clearly leads. TheraNest starts at $29/month and Visage Imaging at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, TheraNest or Visage Imaging?
- TheraNest starts at $29/month and Visage Imaging at On request.
- Does TheraNest or Visage Imaging run on more platforms?
- TheraNest runs on Web, iOS, Android. Visage Imaging runs on Windows, macOS, Web, iOS, Cloud.
- What is TheraNest best used for?
- TheraNest is most often used for a solo therapist who needs a hipaa aligned note and scheduling system and does not bill insurance, where the 29 usd entry tier is genuinely sufficient, a group practice of six to twenty clinicians that wants per clinician productivity and payroll reporting without buying a separate practice management layer, a practice moving off paper or a general purpose calendar that needs a client portal for intake forms and consent signatures, a behavioural health organisation that bills a steady volume of insurance claims each month and can size the advanced allowance against its actual claim count. Of those, a solo therapist who needs a hipaa aligned note and scheduling system and does not bill insurance, where the 29 usd entry tier is genuinely sufficient and a group practice of six to twenty clinicians that wants per clinician productivity and payroll reporting without buying a separate practice management layer are not what Visage Imaging is typically brought in for.
- What can TheraNest do that Visage Imaging cannot?
- TheraNest covers Progress notes and treatment plans, Insurance claims, Client portal, Telehealth. Visage Imaging covers Server-side rendering, One Viewer, Native multi-dimensional tools, Digital breast tomosynthesis reading.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
TheraNest: Is TheraNest still sold under that name?
Yes. The company rebranded from Therapy Brands to Ensora Health and the product is now marketed as TheraNest by Ensora Health, but you still buy TheraNest.
Visage Imaging: Who owns Visage Imaging?
Pro Medicus Limited, listed on the Australian Securities Exchange. That listing means major contract values and terms are publicly announced.
TheraNest: Can I bill insurance on the cheapest plan?
No. Essentials includes no claims. Advanced includes 30 claims a month and Premier is unlimited.
Visage Imaging: How is Visage priced?
Per exam, against a minimum annual volume, on multi-year terms. Because Pro Medicus discloses large contract totals and durations to the market, buyers can estimate a per exam rate before entering negotiation.
TheraNest: Are there hidden costs?
Two. Additional admin users are charged per head, and an AMA CPT licence fee is billed annually in December per therapist.
Visage Imaging: Is Visage 7 FDA cleared for diagnostic interpretation?
Yes, Visage 7 holds 510(k) clearance for diagnostic viewing including mammography and tomosynthesis on validated displays. Confirm the exact cleared modality list for your intended use.
TheraNest: Does it support group practices?
Yes, with per clinician reporting and payroll figures, though every clinician and every admin is a paid seat.
Visage Imaging: Does it work as a full cloud PACS?
Yes, Visage 7 runs complete PACS operations in the cloud rather than cloud viewing over an on-premise archive.
Related pages
More on Visage Imaging
Other head to heads
- TheraNest vs SimplePractice
- TheraNest vs Kareo Clinical
- TheraNest vs Jane App
- TheraNest vs TherapyNotes
- TheraNest vs BetterHelp
- TheraNest vs Ginger
- TheraNest vs Athenahealth
- TheraNest vs DrChrono
- TheraNest vs WebPT
- TheraNest vs Allscripts TouchWorks
- TheraNest vs ChiroTouch
- TheraNest vs Healthie
- TheraNest vs Cerner PowerChart
- TheraNest vs Doctolib
- TheraNest vs Doximity
- TheraNest vs eClinicalWorks
- TheraNest vs Cerner PowerWorks
- TheraNest vs Sectra
- TheraNest vs Rad AI
- TheraNest vs Epic Systems
- TheraNest vs Fujifilm Synapse
- TheraNest vs Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- TheraNest vs Gleamer
- TheraNest vs Annalise.ai
- TheraNest vs OpenMRS
- TheraNest vs Signant Health
- TheraNest vs Ambra Health
- TheraNest vs Aidoc
- TheraNest vs Clue
- TheraNest vs Allscripts
- TheraNest vs Dentrix
- TheraNest vs DHIS2
- TheraNest vs Flo
- TheraNest vs Epic MyChart
- Visage Imaging vs SimplePractice
- Visage Imaging vs Kareo Clinical
- Visage Imaging vs Jane App
- Visage Imaging vs TherapyNotes
- Visage Imaging vs BetterHelp
- Visage Imaging vs Ginger
- Visage Imaging vs Athenahealth
- Visage Imaging vs DrChrono
- Visage Imaging vs WebPT
- Visage Imaging vs Allscripts TouchWorks
- Visage Imaging vs ChiroTouch
- Visage Imaging vs Healthie
- Visage Imaging vs Cerner PowerChart
- Visage Imaging vs Doctolib
- Visage Imaging vs Doximity
- Visage Imaging vs eClinicalWorks
- Visage Imaging vs Cerner PowerWorks
- Visage Imaging vs Sectra
- Visage Imaging vs Rad AI
- Visage Imaging vs Epic Systems
- Visage Imaging vs Fujifilm Synapse
- Visage Imaging vs Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- Visage Imaging vs Gleamer
- Visage Imaging vs Annalise.ai
- Visage Imaging vs OpenMRS
- Visage Imaging vs Signant Health
- Visage Imaging vs Ambra Health
- Visage Imaging vs Aidoc
- Visage Imaging vs Clue
- Visage Imaging vs Allscripts
- Visage Imaging vs Dentrix
- Visage Imaging vs DHIS2
- Visage Imaging vs Flo
- Visage Imaging vs Epic MyChart
