Healthcare · head to head
Kareo Clinical vs Visage Imaging

Kareo Clinical
Healthcare
Specialized EHR and practice management for independent and small practices
- From
- $89/month
- Rated
- -

Visage Imaging
Healthcare
Server-side streaming PACS built for radiologists reading very large studies over thin connections
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Kareo Clinical kareo is now part of Tebra and sold under the Tebra brand rather than as a standalone product; Visage Imaging pricing is per exam against a minimum annual volume, so an organisation whose imaging activity is flat pays a floor while a growing one sees the software line rise every year rather than amortise.
- They diverge on capability: Kareo Clinical covers Electronic Health Records, Visage Imaging covers Server-side rendering.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Kareo Clinical and Visage Imaging actually diverge.
| Attribute | Kareo Clinical | Visage Imaging |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $89/month | On request |
| Pricing model | subscription | quote |
| Platforms | Web, Mobile | Windows, macOS, Web, iOS, Cloud |
| Founded | 2010 | Unknown |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Healthcare).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Kareo Clinical
- Electronic Health Records
- Scheduling
- Patient Portal
- Medical Billing
- ePrescribing
- Analytics
- Labs
- Pharmacies
Only in Visage Imaging
- Server-side rendering
- One Viewer
- Native multi-dimensional tools
- Digital breast tomosynthesis reading
- Open archive
- Cloud PACS operations
- AI accelerator
- On the fly patient jacket
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Kareo Clinical
- Practice management, scheduling and billing for independent medical practicesnot Visage Imaging
- Electronic health records and e-prescribing for small clinicsnot Visage Imaging
- Insurance claim submission and patient payment collectionnot Visage Imaging
Visage Imaging
- An academic health system whose radiologists read from home and cannot tolerate a thousand slice CT taking minutes to opennot Kareo Clinical
- A breast imaging service moving to tomosynthesis where study sizes have made the existing PACS unusable at volumenot Kareo Clinical
- A teleradiology group covering many client sites that needs one viewer rather than a client-specific workstation per contractnot Kareo Clinical
- A health system mid migration that needs priors from three legacy archives assembled into one patient jacket before the data move finishesnot Kareo Clinical
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Kareo Clinical
- Kareo is now part of Tebra and sold under the Tebra brand rather than as a standalone product
- Tebra publishes no rate: pricing varies with provider count, features and implementation requirements and is quoted during a demo
- Billing counts clinical providers such as MDs, DOs, NPs and PAs, so adding a prescriber raises the bill even though non clinical staff are free
- Electronic prescribing of controlled substances setup costs about $75 per provider as a one time fee
- PDMP integration costs $500 one time per facility plus about $50 per user per year
Visage Imaging
- Pricing is per exam against a minimum annual volume, so an organisation whose imaging activity is flat pays a floor while a growing one sees the software line rise every year rather than amortise.
- Module breadth outside radiology is narrower than at Sectra or the large modality vendors, so a group planning to digitise pathology on the same platform will not find it here.
- Server-side rendering shifts the cost to central infrastructure, so the saving on radiologist workstations is partly offset by what you spend on servers or cloud compute.
- Pro Medicus concentrates on very large contracts, and smaller imaging groups report long sales cycles and little appetite from the vendor for deals below a certain volume.
- Diagnostic AI is third party, surfaced through the accelerator framework rather than developed in house, so algorithm licensing, validation and monitoring remain the buyer problem.
Pricing, plan by plan
Kareo Clinical
$89/month- Clinical Starter$89/month
- EHR
- Scheduling
- Patient Portal
- Clinical Plus$189/month
- Everything in Starter
- Billing
- Analytics
Visage Imaging
On request- Visage 7 enterprise contract$undefined/year
- Transaction pricing per exam with a minimum annual volume commitment
- Seven to ten year terms typical for health system contracts
- Contract totals for major deals are disclosed by Pro Medicus to the ASX
Which should you pick?
Choose Kareo Clinical if
- You need electronic health records.
- You work on Web, Mobile.
- You also want scheduling.
Choose Visage Imaging if
- You need server-side rendering.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Web, iOS, Cloud.
- You also want one viewer.
Questions people ask
- Is Kareo Clinical or Visage Imaging better?
- Neither clearly leads. Kareo Clinical starts at $89/month and Visage Imaging at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Kareo Clinical or Visage Imaging?
- Kareo Clinical starts at $89/month and Visage Imaging at On request.
- Does Kareo Clinical or Visage Imaging run on more platforms?
- Kareo Clinical runs on Web, Mobile. Visage Imaging runs on Windows, macOS, Web, iOS, Cloud.
- What is Kareo Clinical best used for?
- Kareo Clinical is most often used for practice management, scheduling and billing for independent medical practices, electronic health records and e-prescribing for small clinics, insurance claim submission and patient payment collection. Of those, practice management, scheduling and billing for independent medical practices and electronic health records and e-prescribing for small clinics are not what Visage Imaging is typically brought in for.
- What can Kareo Clinical do that Visage Imaging cannot?
- Kareo Clinical covers Electronic Health Records, Scheduling, Patient Portal, Medical Billing. Visage Imaging covers Server-side rendering, One Viewer, Native multi-dimensional tools, Digital breast tomosynthesis reading.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Kareo Clinical: How much does Kareo Clinical (now Tebra) cost?
Kareo Clinical pricing is not published publicly. Pricing is based on the number of clinical providers in your practice, not seat licenses. Setup includes optional EPCS at $75/provider and PDMP Integration at $500 one-time per facility plus $50/user/year.
SourceVisage Imaging: Who owns Visage Imaging?
Pro Medicus Limited, listed on the Australian Securities Exchange. That listing means major contract values and terms are publicly announced.
Kareo Clinical: Does Tebra charge for front desk staff and medical assistants?
No. Tebra provides unlimited non-clinical staff access at no extra cost. Front desk staff, medical assistants, billers, and office admins can all access scheduling, charting, and claims modules without increasing billing.
SourceVisage Imaging: How is Visage priced?
Per exam, against a minimum annual volume, on multi-year terms. Because Pro Medicus discloses large contract totals and durations to the market, buyers can estimate a per exam rate before entering negotiation.
Kareo Clinical: Are there reduced rates for low-volume practices on Tebra?
Yes. Practices with providers billing under 100 claims monthly receive lower-tier pricing for those low-volume providers.
SourceVisage Imaging: Is Visage 7 FDA cleared for diagnostic interpretation?
Yes, Visage 7 holds 510(k) clearance for diagnostic viewing including mammography and tomosynthesis on validated displays. Confirm the exact cleared modality list for your intended use.
Visage Imaging: Does it work as a full cloud PACS?
Yes, Visage 7 runs complete PACS operations in the cloud rather than cloud viewing over an on-premise archive.
Related pages
More on Kareo Clinical
More on Visage Imaging
Other head to heads
- Kareo Clinical vs Athenahealth
- Kareo Clinical vs TheraNest
- Kareo Clinical vs Epic Systems
- Kareo Clinical vs Cerner
- Kareo Clinical vs Amwell
- Kareo Clinical vs Practice Fusion
- Kareo Clinical vs DrChrono
- Kareo Clinical vs NextGen Healthcare
- Kareo Clinical vs WebPT
- Kareo Clinical vs Allscripts TouchWorks
- Kareo Clinical vs ChiroTouch
- Kareo Clinical vs eClinicalWorks
- Kareo Clinical vs Rx30
- Kareo Clinical vs Aidoc
- Kareo Clinical vs Annalise.ai
- Kareo Clinical vs Doctor on Demand
- Kareo Clinical vs Doxy.me
- Kareo Clinical vs Fujifilm Synapse
- Kareo Clinical vs Sectra
- Kareo Clinical vs Rad AI
- Kareo Clinical vs Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- Kareo Clinical vs Gleamer
- Kareo Clinical vs OpenMRS
- Kareo Clinical vs Signant Health
- Kareo Clinical vs Ambra Health
- Kareo Clinical vs Clue
- Kareo Clinical vs Allscripts
- Kareo Clinical vs Dentrix
- Kareo Clinical vs DHIS2
- Kareo Clinical vs Flo
- Kareo Clinical vs Epic MyChart
- Visage Imaging vs Athenahealth
- Visage Imaging vs TheraNest
- Visage Imaging vs Epic Systems
- Visage Imaging vs Cerner
- Visage Imaging vs Amwell
- Visage Imaging vs Practice Fusion
- Visage Imaging vs DrChrono
- Visage Imaging vs NextGen Healthcare
- Visage Imaging vs WebPT
- Visage Imaging vs Allscripts TouchWorks
- Visage Imaging vs ChiroTouch
- Visage Imaging vs eClinicalWorks
- Visage Imaging vs Rx30
- Visage Imaging vs Aidoc
- Visage Imaging vs Annalise.ai
- Visage Imaging vs Doctor on Demand
- Visage Imaging vs Doxy.me
- Visage Imaging vs Fujifilm Synapse
- Visage Imaging vs Sectra
- Visage Imaging vs Rad AI
- Visage Imaging vs Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- Visage Imaging vs Gleamer
- Visage Imaging vs OpenMRS
- Visage Imaging vs Signant Health
- Visage Imaging vs Ambra Health
- Visage Imaging vs Clue
- Visage Imaging vs Allscripts
- Visage Imaging vs Dentrix
- Visage Imaging vs DHIS2
- Visage Imaging vs Flo
- Visage Imaging vs Epic MyChart
