Softwr

Spreadsheets · head to head

Teable vs Whalesync

Teable logo

Teable

Spreadsheets

Spreadsheet interface over real PostgreSQL tables, so the data stays queryable by anything that speaks SQL

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Whalesync logo

Whalesync

No-Code

Two-way real-time sync between no-code databases and SaaS tools

From
$40/month
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Only Teable has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
  • Each has a real cost: Teable the automation builder is far less capable than the established commercial alternatives, so multi step workflows usually end up in an external tool that must be paid for and maintained separately.; Whalesync pricing counts records held in sync rather than changes made, so a large but rarely edited catalogue costs the same as a highly active one and the economics punish exactly the datasets that need the least work.
  • They diverge on capability: Teable covers PostgreSQL native storage, Whalesync covers Two-way sync.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Teable and Whalesync actually diverge.

Attributes where Teable and Whalesync differ
AttributeTeableWhalesync
Starting priceFree$40/month
Pricing modelOpen source, no licence feePer month by records in sync
Free tierYesNo
PlatformsWeb, LinuxWeb
CategorySpreadsheetsNo-Code

Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Teable

  • PostgreSQL native storage
  • Multiple views
  • Linked records and rollups
  • Generated REST API
  • Real time collaboration
  • Self hosting via Docker
  • Field level permissions

Only in Whalesync

  • Two-way sync
  • Live updates
  • Field mapping
  • Unlimited mappings
  • Backfill
  • Monitoring
  • Database connectors
  • Relational field support

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Teable

  • A team that has hit the record ceiling of a hosted spreadsheet database and does not want to move to raw SQLnot Whalesync
  • Operational data that a business intelligence tool must also read directly, without an export or a sync jobnot Whalesync
  • A regulated or data resident organisation that needs the underlying database inside its own infrastructurenot Whalesync
  • An internal tool where a grid interface and a REST API over the same table are both requirednot Whalesync

Whalesync

  • A team that plans work in Notion but reports from Airtable and needs one edit to appear in both without anyone copying it acrossnot Teable
  • A marketing site built in Webflow whose content is authored and managed in Airtable, kept in step continuously rather than republished on a schedulenot Teable
  • A startup keeping a Postgres application database and an internal Airtable operations view aligned without building a sync servicenot Teable
  • An agency keeping a client CRM and a project tracker consistent so account managers and delivery staff work from the same recordsnot Teable

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Teable

  • The automation builder is far less capable than the established commercial alternatives, so multi step workflows usually end up in an external tool that must be paid for and maintained separately.
  • Self hosting moves PostgreSQL backups, version upgrades, connection pooling and capacity planning onto your team, and the licence saving disappears if that time is costed honestly.
  • The integration catalogue is small, so connecting to a common business system often means writing against the REST API rather than installing a connector.
  • The project is young relative to the products it replaces, and interface and API changes still arrive at a pace that requires reading release notes before upgrading.
  • Storing every table as a real PostgreSQL table means schema changes are real migrations, so a careless field type change on a large table can lock it far longer than a spreadsheet user would expect.

Whalesync

  • Pricing counts records held in sync rather than changes made, so a large but rarely edited catalogue costs the same as a highly active one and the economics punish exactly the datasets that need the least work.
  • The gap between the 1,000 record starter tier and the million record higher tiers is very wide with no published intermediate price, so a business at ten thousand records cannot tell what it will pay without contacting the vendor.
  • Bidirectional sync has conflict semantics, and when two people edit the same field in two tools within a sync interval one edit is lost, which is silent and only discovered when someone notices their change reverted.
  • It is a small company holding a live connection in the middle of operational data, so continuity risk is real and any team relying on it should keep an export routine and know how it would rebuild the mapping.
  • It syncs records between tools but does not transform or model data, so anything requiring aggregation, deduplication or business logic between the two ends still needs a separate tool or a warehouse.

Pricing, plan by plan

Teable

Free
  • Self hosted open sourceFree
    • No licence fee
    • Unlimited rows subject to your PostgreSQL capacity
    • Docker deployment

Whalesync

$40/month
  • Starter$40/month
    • 1,000 records in sync
    • Live two-way sync
    • Unlimited mappings and row changes
  • Plus$undefined/month
    • Up to 1,000,000 records in sync
    • Live two-way sync
    • Unlimited mappings and row changes
  • Pro$undefined/month
    • Up to 1,000,000 records in sync
    • Priority support
    • Advanced field handling

Which should you pick?

Choose Teable if

  • You need postgresql native storage.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Web, Linux.
  • You also want multiple views.
Teable review

Choose Whalesync if

  • You need two-way sync.
  • You also want live updates.
Whalesync review

Questions people ask

Is Teable or Whalesync better?
Neither clearly leads. Teable starts at Free and Whalesync at $40/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Teable or Whalesync?
Teable has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Teable and $40/month for Whalesync.
Does Teable or Whalesync run on more platforms?
Teable runs on Web, Linux. Whalesync runs on Web.
Can I use Teable for free?
Yes. Teable has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Whalesync starts at $40/month.
What is Teable best used for?
Teable is most often used for a team that has hit the record ceiling of a hosted spreadsheet database and does not want to move to raw sql, operational data that a business intelligence tool must also read directly, without an export or a sync job, a regulated or data resident organisation that needs the underlying database inside its own infrastructure, an internal tool where a grid interface and a rest api over the same table are both required. Of those, a team that has hit the record ceiling of a hosted spreadsheet database and does not want to move to raw sql and operational data that a business intelligence tool must also read directly, without an export or a sync job are not what Whalesync is typically brought in for.
What can Teable do that Whalesync cannot?
Teable covers PostgreSQL native storage, Multiple views, Linked records and rollups, Generated REST API. Whalesync covers Two-way sync, Live updates, Field mapping, Unlimited mappings.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Teable: How many rows can it actually hold?

As many as your PostgreSQL instance can serve. There is no product imposed record limit on the self hosted edition, which is the main reason to choose it.

Whalesync: How is this different from Zapier?

Zapier triggers one-way actions. Whalesync maintains a persistent mapping between two copies of a record so edits flow both ways without loops or duplicates, which two zaps cannot achieve reliably.

Teable: Can I query the data with SQL directly?

Yes. Tables are real PostgreSQL tables, so any SQL client or reporting tool can read them.

Whalesync: What counts as a record in sync?

A record becomes counted the first time it syncs, and records are not double counted across the two applications, so a thousand paired rows count once rather than twice.

Teable: Is self hosting genuinely free?

The licence is. The database server, backups and the engineer maintaining them are not.

Whalesync: Is there a free plan?

No, only a seven day trial. Paid plans start around 40 US dollars a month for a thousand records.

Teable: Does it replace Airtable feature for feature?

No. Views and field types are close; automations, apps and the integration catalogue are not.

Whalesync: What happens on a sync conflict?

One side wins and the other edit is discarded. Teams that expect simultaneous editing of the same fields in two tools should establish an owning system per field rather than relying on the sync to arbitrate.

Teable: What happens to my data if the project stops?

It remains in a standard PostgreSQL database that you control, which is a materially better exit than a proprietary export format.

Share

Related pages

More on Teable

More on Whalesync

Keep looking

Other head to heads