Spreadsheets · head to head
Baserow vs Whalesync

Whalesync
No-Code
Two-way real-time sync between no-code databases and SaaS tools
- From
- $40/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Baserow has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Baserow the free tier is capped at 3,000 rows and 2GB of storage per workspace; Whalesync pricing counts records held in sync rather than changes made, so a large but rarely edited catalogue costs the same as a highly active one and the economics punish exactly the datasets that need the least work.
- They diverge on capability: Baserow covers Database tables, Whalesync covers Two-way sync.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Baserow and Whalesync actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Baserow
- Database tables
- Multiple views
- Forms
- API access
- Real-time collaboration
- Templates
- Plugins
- Self-hosting
Only in Whalesync
- Two-way sync
- Live updates
- Field mapping
- Unlimited mappings
- Backfill
- Monitoring
- Database connectors
- Relational field support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Baserow
- Self-hosting an open source alternative to a spreadsheet databasenot Whalesync
- Structured team data with Kanban, calendar and grid viewsnot Whalesync
- Building internal tools on top of a database with an APInot Whalesync
- Sharing data with external app users without giving them full seatsnot Whalesync
Whalesync
- A team that plans work in Notion but reports from Airtable and needs one edit to appear in both without anyone copying it acrossnot Baserow
- A marketing site built in Webflow whose content is authored and managed in Airtable, kept in step continuously rather than republished on a schedulenot Baserow
- A startup keeping a Postgres application database and an internal Airtable operations view aligned without building a sync servicenot Baserow
- An agency keeping a client CRM and a project tracker consistent so account managers and delivery staff work from the same recordsnot Baserow
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Baserow
- The free tier is capped at 3,000 rows and 2GB of storage per workspace
- Kanban, calendar and survey views need Premium at $10 per user per month billed yearly
- Role-based permissions, audit logs and SSO require Premium or higher
- Row limits are per workspace rather than per table, so splitting data across bases does not raise the ceiling
- Automation runs are metered as credits, 2,000 a month on free
Whalesync
- Pricing counts records held in sync rather than changes made, so a large but rarely edited catalogue costs the same as a highly active one and the economics punish exactly the datasets that need the least work.
- The gap between the 1,000 record starter tier and the million record higher tiers is very wide with no published intermediate price, so a business at ten thousand records cannot tell what it will pay without contacting the vendor.
- Bidirectional sync has conflict semantics, and when two people edit the same field in two tools within a sync interval one edit is lost, which is silent and only discovered when someone notices their change reverted.
- It is a small company holding a live connection in the middle of operational data, so continuity risk is real and any team relying on it should keep an export routine and know how it would rebuild the mapping.
- It syncs records between tools but does not transform or model data, so anything requiring aggregation, deduplication or business logic between the two ends still needs a separate tool or a warehouse.
Pricing, plan by plan
Baserow
Free- FreeFree
- 3000 rows per workspace
- 2 GB storage per workspace
- 2000 automation credits monthly
- Premium$10/month
- 50000 rows per workspace
- 20 GB storage per workspace
- 100000 automation credits monthly
- Advanced$18/month
- 250000 rows per workspace
- 100 GB storage per workspace
- 500000 automation credits monthly
- Enterprise$null/month
- 1000000 rows per workspace
- 1000 GB storage per workspace
- 2000000 automation credits monthly
Whalesync
$40/month- Starter$40/month
- 1,000 records in sync
- Live two-way sync
- Unlimited mappings and row changes
- Plus$undefined/month
- Up to 1,000,000 records in sync
- Live two-way sync
- Unlimited mappings and row changes
- Pro$undefined/month
- Up to 1,000,000 records in sync
- Priority support
- Advanced field handling
Which should you pick?
Choose Baserow if
- You need database tables.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api, Self-hosted.
- You also want multiple views.
Questions people ask
- Is Baserow or Whalesync better?
- Neither clearly leads. Baserow starts at Free and Whalesync at $40/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Baserow or Whalesync?
- Baserow has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Baserow and $40/month for Whalesync.
- Does Baserow or Whalesync run on more platforms?
- Baserow runs on Web, Api, Self-hosted. Whalesync runs on Web.
- Can I use Baserow for free?
- Yes. Baserow has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Whalesync starts at $40/month.
- What is Baserow best used for?
- Baserow is most often used for self-hosting an open source alternative to a spreadsheet database, structured team data with kanban, calendar and grid views, building internal tools on top of a database with an api, sharing data with external app users without giving them full seats. Of those, self-hosting an open source alternative to a spreadsheet database and structured team data with kanban, calendar and grid views are not what Whalesync is typically brought in for.
- What can Baserow do that Whalesync cannot?
- Baserow covers Database tables, Multiple views, Forms, API access. Whalesync covers Two-way sync, Live updates, Field mapping, Unlimited mappings.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Baserow: Does Baserow have a free plan?
Baserow's Free plan includes 3000 rows per workspace, 2 GB storage, 2000 automation credits monthly, and access to Grid, Form, and Gallery views. It supports up to 500 external app users and includes 65+ templates with no credit card required.
SourceWhalesync: How is this different from Zapier?
Zapier triggers one-way actions. Whalesync maintains a persistent mapping between two copies of a record so edits flow both ways without loops or duplicates, which two zaps cannot achieve reliably.
Baserow: What row and storage limits does Baserow provide by plan?
Free plan: 3000 rows and 2 GB storage; Premium plan: 50000 rows and 20 GB; Advanced plan: 250000 rows and 100 GB; Enterprise plan: 1000000 rows and 1 TB. All limits are per workspace.
SourceWhalesync: What counts as a record in sync?
A record becomes counted the first time it syncs, and records are not double counted across the two applications, so a thousand paired rows count once rather than twice.
Baserow: How much does Baserow Premium cost?
Baserow Premium costs $10 per user per month when billed annually, or $12 per month when billing monthly. Yearly billing provides better rates than monthly. Advanced plan costs $18/user/month annually or $22/month monthly.
SourceWhalesync: Is there a free plan?
No, only a seven day trial. Paid plans start around 40 US dollars a month for a thousand records.
Baserow: What are automation credit limits in Baserow?
Free plan provides 2000 monthly automation credits, Premium provides 100000 monthly credits, Advanced provides 500000 monthly credits, and Enterprise provides 2000000 monthly credits for workflow automation.
SourceWhalesync: What happens on a sync conflict?
One side wins and the other edit is discarded. Teams that expect simultaneous editing of the same fields in two tools should establish an owning system per field rather than relying on the sync to arbitrate.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Baserow vs SeaTable
- Baserow vs APITable
- Baserow vs Mathesar
- Baserow vs Teable
- Baserow vs Tableau
- Baserow vs Metabase
- Baserow vs Looker
- Baserow vs Redash
- Baserow vs Rowy
- Baserow vs NocoDB
- Baserow vs Budibase
- Baserow vs Equals
- Baserow vs Quadratic
- Baserow vs Sigma Computing
- Baserow vs Stacker
- Baserow vs Softr
- Baserow vs Noloco
- Baserow vs Quickbase
- Baserow vs AppSheet
- Baserow vs Kintone
- Baserow vs Mendix
- Baserow vs FlutterFlow
- Baserow vs Caspio
- Baserow vs ToolJet
- Baserow vs WeWeb
- Baserow vs Directual
- Baserow vs Corteza
- Baserow vs Draftbit
- Baserow vs Momen
- Whalesync vs SeaTable
- Whalesync vs APITable
- Whalesync vs Mathesar
- Whalesync vs Teable
- Whalesync vs Tableau
- Whalesync vs Metabase
- Whalesync vs Looker
- Whalesync vs Redash
- Whalesync vs Rowy
- Whalesync vs NocoDB
- Whalesync vs Budibase
- Whalesync vs Equals
- Whalesync vs Quadratic
- Whalesync vs Sigma Computing
- Whalesync vs Stacker
- Whalesync vs Softr
- Whalesync vs Noloco
- Whalesync vs Quickbase
- Whalesync vs AppSheet
- Whalesync vs Kintone
- Whalesync vs Mendix
- Whalesync vs FlutterFlow
- Whalesync vs Caspio
- Whalesync vs ToolJet
- Whalesync vs WeWeb
- Whalesync vs Directual
- Whalesync vs Corteza
- Whalesync vs Draftbit
- Whalesync vs Momen

