No-Code · head to head
Caspio vs Teable

Caspio
No-Code
No-code database app platform charging by data records and DataPages rather than by user seats
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Teable
Spreadsheets
Spreadsheet interface over real PostgreSQL tables, so the data stays queryable by anything that speaks SQL
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Teable has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Caspio data record limits are hard caps (1.25 million on Team, 4 million on Business), so a fast-growing dataset can force an upgrade even with the same small internal team using it.; Teable the automation builder is far less capable than the established commercial alternatives, so multi step workflows usually end up in an external tool that must be paid for and maintained separately.
- They diverge on capability: Caspio covers Visual app builder, Teable covers PostgreSQL native storage.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Caspio and Teable actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Caspio
- Visual app builder
- DataPages
- Unlimited users
- Workflow automation
- HIPAA compliance add-on
- Multi-currency billing
Only in Teable
- PostgreSQL native storage
- Multiple views
- Linked records and rollups
- Generated REST API
- Real time collaboration
- Self hosting via Docker
- Field level permissions
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Caspio
- A public-facing organisation running intake forms or surveys with unpredictable, potentially large numbers of occasional external usersnot Teable
- A nonprofit or membership organisation embedding a portal into an existing website without paying per member seatnot Teable
- A team whose main constraint is data record volume rather than the number of people who need accessnot Teable
- A healthcare-adjacent use case needing HIPAA-eligible hosting as a defined add-on rather than a separate vendornot Teable
Teable
- A team that has hit the record ceiling of a hosted spreadsheet database and does not want to move to raw SQLnot Caspio
- Operational data that a business intelligence tool must also read directly, without an export or a sync jobnot Caspio
- A regulated or data resident organisation that needs the underlying database inside its own infrastructurenot Caspio
- An internal tool where a grid interface and a REST API over the same table are both requirednot Caspio
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Caspio
- Data record limits are hard caps (1.25 million on Team, 4 million on Business), so a fast-growing dataset can force an upgrade even with the same small internal team using it.
- DataPage counts (100 on Team, 200 on Business) limit how many distinct app components can be built, which becomes a real constraint for an organisation running many small, separate apps rather than a few large ones.
- The HIPAA compliance add-on costs 500 US dollars a month on top of the base plan with a one-year minimum term, a meaningful additional commitment for healthcare-adjacent buyers.
- Its unlimited-user model is only cheaper than per-seat competitors when the user count is genuinely high relative to data volume; a small team with heavy data needs may find a per-seat platform cheaper.
- The visual builder and DataPages approach is less suited to complex multi-step business process automation than platforms built around workflow engines, such as Appian or Mendix.
Teable
- The automation builder is far less capable than the established commercial alternatives, so multi step workflows usually end up in an external tool that must be paid for and maintained separately.
- Self hosting moves PostgreSQL backups, version upgrades, connection pooling and capacity planning onto your team, and the licence saving disappears if that time is costed honestly.
- The integration catalogue is small, so connecting to a common business system often means writing against the REST API rather than installing a connector.
- The project is young relative to the products it replaces, and interface and API changes still arrive at a pace that requires reading release notes before upgrading.
- Storing every table as a real PostgreSQL table means schema changes are real migrations, so a careless field type change on a large table can lock it far longer than a spreadsheet user would expect.
Pricing, plan by plan
Caspio
On request- Team$300/month
- Unlimited users
- 5 app authors
- 100 DataPages
- Business$600/month
- Unlimited users
- Unlimited app authors
- 200 DataPages
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Custom quote
- Unlimited DataPages
- 2,000,000+ data records
Teable
Free- Self hosted open sourceFree
- No licence fee
- Unlimited rows subject to your PostgreSQL capacity
- Docker deployment
Which should you pick?
Choose Teable if
- You need postgresql native storage.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux.
- You also want multiple views.
Questions people ask
- Is Caspio or Teable better?
- Neither clearly leads. Caspio starts at On request and Teable at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Caspio or Teable?
- Teable has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Caspio and Free for Teable.
- Does Caspio or Teable run on more platforms?
- Caspio runs on Web. Teable runs on Web, Linux.
- Can I use Teable for free?
- Yes. Teable has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Caspio starts at On request.
- What is Caspio best used for?
- Caspio is most often used for a public-facing organisation running intake forms or surveys with unpredictable, potentially large numbers of occasional external users, a nonprofit or membership organisation embedding a portal into an existing website without paying per member seat, a team whose main constraint is data record volume rather than the number of people who need access, a healthcare-adjacent use case needing hipaa-eligible hosting as a defined add-on rather than a separate vendor. Of those, a public-facing organisation running intake forms or surveys with unpredictable, potentially large numbers of occasional external users and a nonprofit or membership organisation embedding a portal into an existing website without paying per member seat are not what Teable is typically brought in for.
- What can Caspio do that Teable cannot?
- Caspio covers Visual app builder, DataPages, Unlimited users, Workflow automation. Teable covers PostgreSQL native storage, Multiple views, Linked records and rollups, Generated REST API.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Caspio: Does Caspio charge per user?
No. Every published tier includes unlimited users; the price scales with data record volume and DataPage count instead.
Teable: How many rows can it actually hold?
As many as your PostgreSQL instance can serve. There is no product imposed record limit on the self hosted edition, which is the main reason to choose it.
Caspio: What is a DataPage?
An individually configured, embeddable app component, such as a form or report, that can be placed inside an existing website.
Teable: Can I query the data with SQL directly?
Yes. Tables are real PostgreSQL tables, so any SQL client or reporting tool can read them.
Caspio: Is HIPAA compliance included?
No, it is a separate add-on priced at 500 US dollars a month with a minimum one-year term.
Teable: Is self hosting genuinely free?
The licence is. The database server, backups and the engineer maintaining them are not.
Teable: Does it replace Airtable feature for feature?
No. Views and field types are close; automations, apps and the integration catalogue are not.
Teable: What happens to my data if the project stops?
It remains in a standard PostgreSQL database that you control, which is a materially better exit than a proprietary export format.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Caspio vs Quickbase
- Caspio vs Zoho Creator
- Caspio vs Mendix
- Caspio vs OutSystems
- Caspio vs Directual
- Caspio vs Appian
- Caspio vs Noloco
- Caspio vs Superblocks
- Caspio vs Whalesync
- Caspio vs Momen
- Caspio vs Pabbly Connect
- Caspio vs Stacker
- Caspio vs Thunkable
- Caspio vs Baserow
- Caspio vs NocoDB
- Caspio vs APITable
- Caspio vs Mathesar
- Caspio vs Rowy
- Caspio vs SeaTable
- Caspio vs Equals
- Caspio vs Looker
- Caspio vs Numbers
- Caspio vs Cube Software
- Caspio vs Quadratic
- Caspio vs Tableau
- Caspio vs Coefficient
- Teable vs Quickbase
- Teable vs Zoho Creator
- Teable vs Mendix
- Teable vs OutSystems
- Teable vs Directual
- Teable vs Appian
- Teable vs Noloco
- Teable vs Superblocks
- Teable vs Whalesync
- Teable vs Momen
- Teable vs Pabbly Connect
- Teable vs Stacker
- Teable vs Thunkable
- Teable vs Baserow
- Teable vs NocoDB
- Teable vs APITable
- Teable vs Mathesar
- Teable vs Rowy
- Teable vs SeaTable
- Teable vs Equals
- Teable vs Looker
- Teable vs Numbers
- Teable vs Cube Software
- Teable vs Quadratic
- Teable vs Tableau
- Teable vs Coefficient
