No-Code · head to head
Softr vs Teable

Softr
No-Code
No-code platform for building web apps, client portals and directories from data
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Teable
Spreadsheets
Spreadsheet interface over real PostgreSQL tables, so the data stays queryable by anything that speaks SQL
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Softr pricing scales with the number of app users, which can get expensive for consumer-facing apps.; Teable the automation builder is far less capable than the established commercial alternatives, so multi step workflows usually end up in an external tool that must be paid for and maintained separately.
- They diverge on capability: Softr covers Data source connectors, Teable covers PostgreSQL native storage.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Softr and Teable actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Softr
- Data source connectors
- Pre-built blocks
- User authentication & permissions
- Client portals
- Payments
- Custom domains
Only in Teable
- PostgreSQL native storage
- Multiple views
- Linked records and rollups
- Generated REST API
- Real time collaboration
- Self hosting via Docker
- Field level permissions
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Softr
- Client and partner portalsnot Teable
- Internal tools on top of Airtablenot Teable
- Directory and marketplace websitesnot Teable
- MVP prototypes for startupsnot Teable
Teable
- A team that has hit the record ceiling of a hosted spreadsheet database and does not want to move to raw SQLnot Softr
- Operational data that a business intelligence tool must also read directly, without an export or a sync jobnot Softr
- A regulated or data resident organisation that needs the underlying database inside its own infrastructurenot Softr
- An internal tool where a grid interface and a REST API over the same table are both requirednot Softr
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Softr
- Pricing scales with the number of app users, which can get expensive for consumer-facing apps.
- Complex custom logic requires workarounds since it lacks a full scripting layer.
- Deep customization of UI beyond provided blocks is limited compared to code-based builders.
- Performance depends heavily on the connected data source, e.g. Airtable API limits.
Teable
- The automation builder is far less capable than the established commercial alternatives, so multi step workflows usually end up in an external tool that must be paid for and maintained separately.
- Self hosting moves PostgreSQL backups, version upgrades, connection pooling and capacity planning onto your team, and the licence saving disappears if that time is costed honestly.
- The integration catalogue is small, so connecting to a common business system often means writing against the REST API rather than installing a connector.
- The project is young relative to the products it replaces, and interface and API changes still arrive at a pace that requires reading release notes before upgrading.
- Storing every table as a real PostgreSQL table means schema changes are real migrations, so a careless field type change on a large table can lock it far longer than a spreadsheet user would expect.
Pricing, plan by plan
Softr
Free- FreeFree
- Up to 3 app builders
- 5 combined app users
- No custom domain
- Basic$25/month
- 1 app builder
- 5 Team + 5 Client users
- 1 custom domain
- Pro$119/month
- 2 app builders
- Up to 50 Team + 250 Client users
- 1 custom domain
- Business$395/month
- 3 app builders
- Up to 100 Team + 500 Client users
- 1 custom domain
Teable
Free- Self hosted open sourceFree
- No licence fee
- Unlimited rows subject to your PostgreSQL capacity
- Docker deployment
Which should you pick?
Choose Softr if
- You need data source connectors.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web.
- You also want pre-built blocks.
Choose Teable if
- You need postgresql native storage.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux.
- You also want multiple views.
Questions people ask
- Is Softr or Teable better?
- Neither clearly leads. Softr starts at Free and Teable at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Softr or Teable?
- Softr starts at Free and Teable at Free.
- Does Softr or Teable run on more platforms?
- Softr runs on web. Teable runs on Web, Linux.
- Can I use Softr for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Softr best used for?
- Softr is most often used for client and partner portals, internal tools on top of airtable, directory and marketplace websites, mvp prototypes for startups. Of those, client and partner portals and internal tools on top of airtable are not what Teable is typically brought in for.
- What can Softr do that Teable cannot?
- Softr covers Data source connectors, Pre-built blocks, User authentication & permissions, Client portals. Teable covers PostgreSQL native storage, Multiple views, Linked records and rollups, Generated REST API.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Softr: What does Softr cost?
Softr offers Free, Basic ($25/mo), Pro ($119/mo), Business ($395/mo), and custom Enterprise plans, with annual billing giving roughly two months free.
SourceTeable: How many rows can it actually hold?
As many as your PostgreSQL instance can serve. There is no product imposed record limit on the self hosted edition, which is the main reason to choose it.
Softr: Is there a free plan, and what are its limits?
The Free plan allows up to 3 app builders and 5 combined app users, with no custom domain included.
SourceTeable: Can I query the data with SQL directly?
Yes. Tables are real PostgreSQL tables, so any SQL client or reporting tool can read them.
Softr: How is usage metered?
Softr charges based on the number of app builders and app users (Team and Client), not on the number of apps published; extra users and domains cost additional monthly fees.
SourceTeable: Is self hosting genuinely free?
The licence is. The database server, backups and the engineer maintaining them are not.
Teable: Does it replace Airtable feature for feature?
No. Views and field types are close; automations, apps and the integration catalogue are not.
Teable: What happens to my data if the project stops?
It remains in a standard PostgreSQL database that you control, which is a materially better exit than a proprietary export format.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Softr vs Noloco
- Softr vs Stacker
- Softr vs Bubble
- Softr vs Glide
- Softr vs WeWeb
- Softr vs ToolJet
- Softr vs Appsmith
- Softr vs Whalesync
- Softr vs Draftbit
- Softr vs FlutterFlow
- Softr vs Superblocks
- Softr vs AppSheet
- Softr vs Corteza
- Softr vs Directual
- Softr vs Baserow
- Softr vs NocoDB
- Softr vs APITable
- Softr vs Mathesar
- Softr vs Rowy
- Softr vs SeaTable
- Softr vs Equals
- Softr vs Looker
- Softr vs Numbers
- Softr vs Cube Software
- Softr vs Quadratic
- Softr vs Tableau
- Softr vs Coefficient
- Teable vs Noloco
- Teable vs Stacker
- Teable vs Bubble
- Teable vs Glide
- Teable vs WeWeb
- Teable vs ToolJet
- Teable vs Appsmith
- Teable vs Whalesync
- Teable vs Draftbit
- Teable vs FlutterFlow
- Teable vs Superblocks
- Teable vs AppSheet
- Teable vs Corteza
- Teable vs Directual
- Teable vs Baserow
- Teable vs NocoDB
- Teable vs APITable
- Teable vs Mathesar
- Teable vs Rowy
- Teable vs SeaTable
- Teable vs Equals
- Teable vs Looker
- Teable vs Numbers
- Teable vs Cube Software
- Teable vs Quadratic
- Teable vs Tableau
- Teable vs Coefficient
