Nonprofits · head to head
GrantStation vs Sumac

GrantStation
Nonprofits
A low-cost grant opportunity database sold on annual membership, usually at a heavy standing discount
- From
- $199/year
- Rated
- -

Sumac
Nonprofits
Modular nonprofit CRM that pairs donor management with client case management
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: GrantStation it is a database with no pipeline, no deadline tracking against your own applications and no post-award reporting, so any team of more than one ends up managing grants in a spreadsheet anyway.; Sumac pricing is not published at all, so a small organisation cannot compare Sumac against per contact priced competitors without committing to a sales process.
- They diverge on capability: GrantStation covers US grantmaker database, Sumac covers Donor and gift management.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which GrantStation and Sumac actually diverge.
| Attribute | GrantStation | Sumac |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $199/year | On request |
| Pricing model | Per organisation per year | quote |
| Platforms | Web | Web, Windows |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Nonprofits).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in GrantStation
- US grantmaker database
- Federal and state funding
- International and Canadian databases
- Weekly opportunity bulletin
- PathFinder library
- Saved searches
Only in Sumac
- Donor and gift management
- Case management module
- Memberships and volunteers
- Grant management
- Role based permissions
- Custom fields and forms
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
GrantStation
- A small nonprofit with no grants budget that needs a starting list of plausible funders in its statenot Sumac
- A solo grant writer validating whether a cause area has enough funders to justify a grants strategynot Sumac
- An organisation whose state nonprofit association resells the membership at 75 to 139 dollars, making it near-free researchnot Sumac
- Supplementing an existing donor CRM with opportunity discovery without adding a second four-figure subscriptionnot Sumac
Sumac
- A social service agency that must record client cases and donor gifts without buying two systemsnot GrantStation
- A charity that wants only donor and grant modules and refuses to pay for an events suite it will not usenot GrantStation
- A Canadian organisation wanting local support hours and receipting conventionsnot GrantStation
- An agency replacing a legacy Access or FileMaker database with something supportednot GrantStation
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
GrantStation
- It is a database with no pipeline, no deadline tracking against your own applications and no post-award reporting, so any team of more than one ends up managing grants in a spreadsheet anyway.
- The published 699 dollar list price bears no relation to the market price, which means buyers who purchase direct without checking association rates routinely overpay by three to nine times.
- Funder records are broad but shallow compared with 990-derived tools, so vetting whether a foundation actually funds organisations like yours still requires separate research.
- There are no integrations with donor CRMs or accounting systems, so nothing found in GrantStation flows anywhere else without manual re-entry.
- Data freshness varies by database, and the international pool in particular is thin relative to the US listings it is bundled with.
Sumac
- Pricing is not published at all, so a small organisation cannot compare Sumac against per contact priced competitors without committing to a sales process.
- The interface reflects the product's age, and staff arriving from consumer grade software find navigation and data entry slower than in newer CRMs.
- Holding client case notes and donor records in one database makes permission design a compliance obligation, and a misconfigured role can expose confidential client material to fundraising staff.
- The integration catalogue is small, so payment, email and accounting connections outside the listed few mean manual export or paid custom work.
- Modular licensing means the price rises in visible steps as programmes expand, and organisations frequently discover the module they need most was not in the original quote.
Pricing, plan by plan
GrantStation
$199/year- Membership (promotional or association rate)$199/year
- Full US, Canadian and international databases
- Weekly opportunity bulletin
- PathFinder training library
- Membership (list price)$699/year
- Identical access to the promotional rate
- Rarely the price actually paid
Sumac
On request- Sumac$undefined/year
- Quoted by module selection and organisation size
- Case management is a separately licensed module
- Implementation and data migration quoted separately
Which should you pick?
Choose GrantStation if
- You need us grantmaker database.
- You also want federal and state funding.
Choose Sumac if
- You need donor and gift management.
- You work on Web, Windows.
- You also want case management module.
Questions people ask
- Is GrantStation or Sumac better?
- Neither clearly leads. GrantStation starts at $199/year and Sumac at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, GrantStation or Sumac?
- GrantStation starts at $199/year and Sumac at On request.
- Does GrantStation or Sumac run on more platforms?
- GrantStation runs on Web. Sumac runs on Web, Windows.
- What is GrantStation best used for?
- GrantStation is most often used for a small nonprofit with no grants budget that needs a starting list of plausible funders in its state, a solo grant writer validating whether a cause area has enough funders to justify a grants strategy, an organisation whose state nonprofit association resells the membership at 75 to 139 dollars, making it near-free research, supplementing an existing donor crm with opportunity discovery without adding a second four-figure subscription. Of those, a small nonprofit with no grants budget that needs a starting list of plausible funders in its state and a solo grant writer validating whether a cause area has enough funders to justify a grants strategy are not what Sumac is typically brought in for.
- What can GrantStation do that Sumac cannot?
- GrantStation covers US grantmaker database, Federal and state funding, International and Canadian databases, Weekly opportunity bulletin. Sumac covers Donor and gift management, Case management module, Memberships and volunteers, Grant management.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
GrantStation: What does GrantStation actually cost?
List price is 699 USD a year but the standing promotional rate is 199, and nonprofit associations resell it to members for 75 to 139. Check your association before buying direct.
Sumac: Is Sumac the same product as Societ?
The vendor has been moving its products under the Societ brand, so you may see both names for the same platform during a sales cycle.
GrantStation: Does it track my applications?
No. It finds opportunities. Pipeline, deadlines and reporting have to live elsewhere.
Sumac: Can it handle client case management?
Yes, that is its clearest differentiator among donor CRMs. It is a licensed module, not part of the base product.
GrantStation: How does it compare with Instrumentl?
It is roughly a tenth of the price and does roughly a tenth of the job. Instrumentl adds matching, pipeline and post-award tracking.
Sumac: Is pricing published?
No. It is quoted by module and organisation size, which makes like for like comparison harder than with published per contact products.
GrantStation: Is there a free trial?
GrantStation offers a limited free search tool and periodic trials, but the full databases require membership.
Sumac: Does it work for US charities?
Yes, though the vendor is Canadian and its receipting and support conventions are strongest for Canadian organisations.
Related pages
More on GrantStation
Other head to heads
- GrantStation vs Instrumentl
- GrantStation vs GuideStar
- GrantStation vs Keela
- GrantStation vs Wild Apricot
- GrantStation vs SmartSimple Cloud
- GrantStation vs Blackbaud Grantmaking
- GrantStation vs Candid
- GrantStation vs Submittable
- GrantStation vs CharityEngine
- GrantStation vs Handbid
- GrantStation vs Bonterra
- GrantStation vs Kindful
- GrantStation vs Microsoft Nonprofit Program
- GrantStation vs Mightycause
- GrantStation vs MobileCause
- GrantStation vs OpenGrants
- GrantStation vs Bloomerang
- GrantStation vs DonorPerfect
- GrantStation vs Blackbaud Raiser's Edge
- GrantStation vs CiviCRM
- GrantStation vs Aplos
- GrantStation vs CommCare
- GrantStation vs QuickBooks for Nonprofits
- GrantStation vs Raisely
- GrantStation vs SignUpGenius
- GrantStation vs TechSoup
- GrantStation vs Tendenci
- Sumac vs Instrumentl
- Sumac vs GuideStar
- Sumac vs Keela
- Sumac vs Wild Apricot
- Sumac vs SmartSimple Cloud
- Sumac vs Blackbaud Grantmaking
- Sumac vs Candid
- Sumac vs Submittable
- Sumac vs CharityEngine
- Sumac vs Handbid
- Sumac vs Bonterra
- Sumac vs Kindful
- Sumac vs Microsoft Nonprofit Program
- Sumac vs Mightycause
- Sumac vs MobileCause
- Sumac vs OpenGrants
- Sumac vs Bloomerang
- Sumac vs DonorPerfect
- Sumac vs Blackbaud Raiser's Edge
- Sumac vs CiviCRM
- Sumac vs Aplos
- Sumac vs CommCare
- Sumac vs QuickBooks for Nonprofits
- Sumac vs Raisely
- Sumac vs SignUpGenius
- Sumac vs TechSoup
- Sumac vs Tendenci
