APIs · head to head
Strapi vs Swan

Swan
APIs
European banking-as-a-service platform for embedding accounts, cards and payments into other products
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Strapi cloud pricing is per project, not per account, so a second project doubles the bill; Swan its regulatory base and strongest local account coverage are French and European, so companies needing US, UK-post-Brexit-specific, or broader global banking-as-a-service need an additional provider.
- They diverge on capability: Strapi covers REST API, Swan covers Embedded business accounts.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Strapi and Swan actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (APIs).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Strapi
- REST API
- GraphQL API
- Content management
- PostgreSQL
- MySQL
- MongoDB
- AWS
- Webhooks
Only in Swan
- Embedded business accounts
- Card issuing
- SEPA payments
- Local account localisation
- ACPR regulation
- Usage-based pricing
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Strapi
- Running a self hosted headless CMS with a REST or GraphQL APInot Swan
- Giving editors a content admin panel over a custom content modelnot Swan
Swan
- A vertical SaaS platform wanting to embed business bank accounts under its own brandnot Strapi
- A marketplace wanting to issue cards to sellers or partners without becoming a licensed banknot Strapi
- A company wanting SEPA payment initiation embedded directly into its own productnot Strapi
- A European fintech wanting to avoid a six-figure setup fee and long lock-in typical of legacy banking-as-a-service dealsnot Strapi
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Strapi
- Cloud pricing is per project, not per account, so a second project doubles the bill
- Starter at $35 a month allows 100,000 API requests, and overage is $1.50 per 25,000
- Extra bandwidth is $30 per 100 GB and extra asset storage $0.60 per GB
- Backups start at the Pro plan, weekly, and only become daily at Business
- An uptime SLA is Business only, at $450 a month per project
- Additional environments cost $60 a month on Pro and $300 a month on Business
Swan
- Its regulatory base and strongest local account coverage are French and European, so companies needing US, UK-post-Brexit-specific, or broader global banking-as-a-service need an additional provider.
- Pricing is described only philosophically (usage-based, no big setup fee) rather than published as an actual rate card, so a company still needs a sales conversation to get real numbers.
- Embedding banking features into a product is a substantial compliance and design undertaking regardless of the vendor, and Swan handling the licence does not remove a platform's own KYC, AML and customer support obligations for the accounts it offers.
- As a comparatively young, single-country-licensed e-money institution, its balance sheet and regulatory standing carry more concentration risk than a banking-as-a-service offering backed by an established, multi-jurisdiction bank.
- Local account depth is explicitly limited to France, Germany and Spain, so a platform needing native local accounts in other European countries may find coverage thinner than expected.
Pricing, plan by plan
Strapi
$35/month- Starter$35/month
- 100k API requests
- 50 GB asset storage
- 50 GB asset bandwidth
- Pro$90/month
- 1M API requests
- 250 GB asset storage
- 500 GB asset bandwidth
- Business$450/month
- 10M API requests
- 1000 GB asset storage
- 1000 GB asset bandwidth
Swan
On request- Swan$undefined/month
- Usage-based pricing, no published rate card
- No long-term contract or large setup fee required
- Custom quote based on current, not forecast, usage
Which should you pick?
Choose Strapi if
- You need rest api.
- You work on Node.js, Cloud, Self-hosted, Docker.
- You also want graphql api.
Choose Swan if
- You need embedded business accounts.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want card issuing.
Questions people ask
- Is Strapi or Swan better?
- Neither clearly leads. Strapi starts at $35/month and Swan at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Strapi or Swan?
- Strapi starts at $35/month and Swan at On request.
- Does Strapi or Swan run on more platforms?
- Strapi runs on Node.js, Cloud, Self-hosted, Docker. Swan runs on Web, API.
- What is Strapi best used for?
- Strapi is most often used for running a self hosted headless cms with a rest or graphql api, giving editors a content admin panel over a custom content model. Of those, running a self hosted headless cms with a rest or graphql api and giving editors a content admin panel over a custom content model are not what Swan is typically brought in for.
- What can Strapi do that Swan cannot?
- Strapi covers REST API, GraphQL API, Content management, PostgreSQL. Swan covers Embedded business accounts, Card issuing, SEPA payments, Local account localisation.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Strapi: How much do API request overages cost?
Additional API requests beyond the plan limit cost $1.50 per 25000 requests. Extra asset storage costs $0.60 per GB, and additional bandwidth costs $30 per 100 GB.
SourceSwan: Which countries does Swan offer local accounts in?
France, Germany and Spain specifically, alongside broader SEPA payment coverage.
Strapi: Is yearly billing available?
Yes, yearly billing saves up to 17% compared to monthly billing on Strapi Cloud plans.
SourceSwan: Is pricing published?
No, Swan describes a usage-based, no-large-setup-fee philosophy but requires a quote for actual numbers.
Strapi: What is included with the Pro plan?
The Pro plan costs $90 per month per project and includes 1M API requests, 250 GB asset storage, 500 GB bandwidth, multi-environment support, weekly backups, and manual backups.
SourceSwan: Who regulates Swan?
France's ACPR (Autorite de Controle Prudentiel et de Resolution), as a licensed e-money institution.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Strapi vs PocketBase
- Strapi vs Appwrite
- Strapi vs Hasura
- Strapi vs Sanity
- Strapi vs Directus
- Strapi vs KeystoneJS
- Strapi vs Payload CMS
- Strapi vs Parse Server
- Strapi vs GraphQL Apollo
- Strapi vs Gravitee
- Strapi vs Kong Gateway
- Strapi vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Strapi vs Swagger
- Strapi vs TIBCO Mashery
- Strapi vs Zeplo
- Strapi vs Pusher
- Strapi vs Salt Edge
- Strapi vs Kong
- Strapi vs Vodeno
- Strapi vs Trustly
- Strapi vs Yapily
- Strapi vs Unit
- Strapi vs Griffin
- Strapi vs Weavr
- Strapi vs Fintech Farm
- Strapi vs Lithic
- Strapi vs Solaris
- Strapi vs Treasury Prime
- Strapi vs Synctera
- Strapi vs Astra
- Strapi vs Treblle
- Strapi vs Tribe Payments
- Strapi vs Tuum
- Swan vs PocketBase
- Swan vs Appwrite
- Swan vs Hasura
- Swan vs Sanity
- Swan vs Directus
- Swan vs KeystoneJS
- Swan vs Payload CMS
- Swan vs Parse Server
- Swan vs GraphQL Apollo
- Swan vs Gravitee
- Swan vs Kong Gateway
- Swan vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Swan vs Swagger
- Swan vs TIBCO Mashery
- Swan vs Zeplo
- Swan vs Pusher
- Swan vs Salt Edge
- Swan vs Kong
- Swan vs Vodeno
- Swan vs Trustly
- Swan vs Yapily
- Swan vs Unit
- Swan vs Griffin
- Swan vs Weavr
- Swan vs Fintech Farm
- Swan vs Lithic
- Swan vs Solaris
- Swan vs Treasury Prime
- Swan vs Synctera
- Swan vs Astra
- Swan vs Treblle
- Swan vs Tribe Payments
- Swan vs Tuum

