Softwr

APIs · head to head

Fintech Farm vs Strapi

Fintech Farm logo

Fintech Farm

APIs

"Neobank in a box" for banks in emerging markets, paid on a performance basis

From
On request
Rated
-
Strapi logo

Strapi

APIs

Headless CMS with REST and GraphQL APIs

From
$35/month
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Fintech Farm the performance-based model means a bank is entering an ongoing revenue-sharing relationship rather than buying a one-time or fixed-fee software licence, which changes long-term cost dynamics as the neobank grows.; Strapi cloud pricing is per project, not per account, so a second project doubles the bill
  • They diverge on capability: Fintech Farm covers End-to-end neobank stack, Strapi covers REST API.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Fintech Farm and Strapi actually diverge.

Attributes where Fintech Farm and Strapi differ
AttributeFintech FarmStrapi
Starting priceOn request$35/month
Pricing modelquotesubscription
PlatformsWeb, iOS, AndroidNode.js, Cloud, Self-hosted, Docker
FoundedUnknown2015

Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (APIs).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Fintech Farm

  • End-to-end neobank stack
  • Credit scoring engines
  • Debit, credit and BNPL products
  • Investment features
  • Performance-based partnership
  • Emerging market focus

Only in Strapi

  • REST API
  • GraphQL API
  • Content management
  • PostgreSQL
  • MySQL
  • MongoDB
  • AWS
  • Webhooks

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Fintech Farm

  • A mid-sized regulated bank in an emerging market wanting to launch a neobank without building digital product expertise in housenot Strapi
  • A bank wanting a partner compensated on growth outcomes rather than a fixed software licencenot Strapi
  • An institution needing credit scoring built specifically for thin-file, underbanked emerging market customersnot Strapi
  • A bank expanding into a new emerging market and wanting a proven neobank launch playbook rather than starting from scratchnot Strapi

Strapi

  • Running a self hosted headless CMS with a REST or GraphQL APInot Fintech Farm
  • Giving editors a content admin panel over a custom content modelnot Fintech Farm

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Fintech Farm

  • The performance-based model means a bank is entering an ongoing revenue-sharing relationship rather than buying a one-time or fixed-fee software licence, which changes long-term cost dynamics as the neobank grows.
  • It requires the partner bank to already hold a banking licence and balance sheet, so it is not usable by a company wanting to launch banking services without any existing regulatory status.
  • Focus on emerging markets means less proven track record in developed, heavily regulated markets such as the US or Western Europe.
  • As a smaller, founder-led company relative to Mambu or Temenos, its longevity and ability to support partner banks over a decade-plus relationship carries more vendor-risk uncertainty.
  • Being compensated on customer and revenue growth creates a natural incentive to prioritise growth-driving features over, for example, deep compliance tooling that does not directly move those metrics.

Strapi

  • Cloud pricing is per project, not per account, so a second project doubles the bill
  • Starter at $35 a month allows 100,000 API requests, and overage is $1.50 per 25,000
  • Extra bandwidth is $30 per 100 GB and extra asset storage $0.60 per GB
  • Backups start at the Pro plan, weekly, and only become daily at Business
  • An uptime SLA is Business only, at $450 a month per project
  • Additional environments cost $60 a month on Pro and $300 a month on Business

Pricing, plan by plan

Fintech Farm

On request
  • Fintech Farm$undefined/year
    • Performance-based compensation tied to customer numbers and revenue generated
    • No published flat licence fee

Strapi

$35/month
  • Starter$35/month
    • 100k API requests
    • 50 GB asset storage
    • 50 GB asset bandwidth
  • Pro$90/month
    • 1M API requests
    • 250 GB asset storage
    • 500 GB asset bandwidth
  • Business$450/month
    • 10M API requests
    • 1000 GB asset storage
    • 1000 GB asset bandwidth

Which should you pick?

Choose Fintech Farm if

  • You need end-to-end neobank stack.
  • You work on Web, iOS, Android.
  • You also want credit scoring engines.

Choose Strapi if

  • You need rest api.
  • You work on Node.js, Cloud, Self-hosted, Docker.
  • You also want graphql api.

Questions people ask

Is Fintech Farm or Strapi better?
Neither clearly leads. Fintech Farm starts at On request and Strapi at $35/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Fintech Farm or Strapi?
Fintech Farm starts at On request and Strapi at $35/month.
Does Fintech Farm or Strapi run on more platforms?
Fintech Farm runs on Web, iOS, Android. Strapi runs on Node.js, Cloud, Self-hosted, Docker.
What is Fintech Farm best used for?
Fintech Farm is most often used for a mid-sized regulated bank in an emerging market wanting to launch a neobank without building digital product expertise in house, a bank wanting a partner compensated on growth outcomes rather than a fixed software licence, an institution needing credit scoring built specifically for thin-file, underbanked emerging market customers, a bank expanding into a new emerging market and wanting a proven neobank launch playbook rather than starting from scratch. Of those, a mid-sized regulated bank in an emerging market wanting to launch a neobank without building digital product expertise in house and a bank wanting a partner compensated on growth outcomes rather than a fixed software licence are not what Strapi is typically brought in for.
What can Fintech Farm do that Strapi cannot?
Fintech Farm covers End-to-end neobank stack, Credit scoring engines, Debit, credit and BNPL products, Investment features. Strapi covers REST API, GraphQL API, Content management, PostgreSQL.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Fintech Farm: How is Fintech Farm paid?

On a performance basis, tied to the number of customers and revenue its neobank product generates for the partner bank, rather than a flat licence fee.

Strapi: How much do API request overages cost?

Additional API requests beyond the plan limit cost $1.50 per 25000 requests. Extra asset storage costs $0.60 per GB, and additional bandwidth costs $30 per 100 GB.

Source
Fintech Farm: Does the bank need its own licence?

Yes, Fintech Farm partners with banks that already hold a banking licence and balance sheet; it does not provide the licence itself.

Strapi: Is yearly billing available?

Yes, yearly billing saves up to 17% compared to monthly billing on Strapi Cloud plans.

Source
Fintech Farm: Which markets does it focus on?

Emerging markets, including operations across regions such as Vietnam, Nigeria and increasingly India.

Strapi: What is included with the Pro plan?

The Pro plan costs $90 per month per project and includes 1M API requests, 250 GB asset storage, 500 GB bandwidth, multi-environment support, weekly backups, and manual backups.

Source
Share

Related pages

Other head to heads