APIs · head to head
Sanity vs Swan

Sanity
APIs
Headless CMS with real-time collaborative editing and structured content APIs
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Swan
APIs
European banking-as-a-service platform for embedding accounts, cards and payments into other products
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Sanity has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Sanity free plan limited to 10,000 documents and 100GB assets; Swan its regulatory base and strongest local account coverage are French and European, so companies needing US, UK-post-Brexit-specific, or broader global banking-as-a-service need an additional provider.
- They diverge on capability: Sanity covers Content API, Swan covers Embedded business accounts.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Sanity and Swan actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (APIs).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Sanity
- Content API
- Collaborative editing
- Structured content
- Webhooks
- Third-party services
- GROQ query language
- Cloud support
- JavaScript SDK support
Only in Swan
- Embedded business accounts
- Card issuing
- SEPA payments
- Local account localisation
- ACPR regulation
- Usage-based pricing
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Sanity
- Headless CMS for structured content managementnot Swan
- Collaborative content editing with real-time multiplayer supportnot Swan
- API-driven content delivery with GROQ query languagenot Swan
Swan
- A vertical SaaS platform wanting to embed business bank accounts under its own brandnot Sanity
- A marketplace wanting to issue cards to sellers or partners without becoming a licensed banknot Sanity
- A company wanting SEPA payment initiation embedded directly into its own productnot Sanity
- A European fintech wanting to avoid a six-figure setup fee and long lock-in typical of legacy banking-as-a-service dealsnot Sanity
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Sanity
- Free plan limited to 10,000 documents and 100GB assets
- Free plan supports only public datasets
- Growth plan capped at 50 seats maximum
- Private datasets, scheduled drafts, and comments/tasks require paid plans
- Annual billing unavailable for Growth plan; Enterprise-only
Swan
- Its regulatory base and strongest local account coverage are French and European, so companies needing US, UK-post-Brexit-specific, or broader global banking-as-a-service need an additional provider.
- Pricing is described only philosophically (usage-based, no big setup fee) rather than published as an actual rate card, so a company still needs a sales conversation to get real numbers.
- Embedding banking features into a product is a substantial compliance and design undertaking regardless of the vendor, and Swan handling the licence does not remove a platform's own KYC, AML and customer support obligations for the accounts it offers.
- As a comparatively young, single-country-licensed e-money institution, its balance sheet and regulatory standing carry more concentration risk than a banking-as-a-service offering backed by an established, multi-jurisdiction bank.
- Local account depth is explicitly limited to France, Germany and Spain, so a platform needing native local accounts in other European countries may find coverage thinner than expected.
Pricing, plan by plan
Sanity
Free- FreeFree
- Up to 20 seats
- 2 public datasets only
- 10,000 documents included
- Growth$15/month
- Up to 50 seats per seat
- 2 private or public datasets
- 25,000 documents included
- Enterprise$null/month
- Custom seats
- Custom datasets
- Custom document limits
Swan
On request- Swan$undefined/month
- Usage-based pricing, no published rate card
- No long-term contract or large setup fee required
- Custom quote based on current, not forecast, usage
Which should you pick?
Choose Sanity if
- You need content api.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want collaborative editing.
Choose Swan if
- You need embedded business accounts.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want card issuing.
Questions people ask
- Is Sanity or Swan better?
- Neither clearly leads. Sanity starts at Free and Swan at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Sanity or Swan?
- Sanity has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Sanity and On request for Swan.
- Does Sanity or Swan run on more platforms?
- Sanity runs on Web. Swan runs on Web, API.
- Can I use Sanity for free?
- Yes. Sanity has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Swan starts at On request.
- What is Sanity best used for?
- Sanity is most often used for headless cms for structured content management, collaborative content editing with real-time multiplayer support, api-driven content delivery with groq query language. Of those, headless cms for structured content management and collaborative content editing with real-time multiplayer support are not what Swan is typically brought in for.
- What can Sanity do that Swan cannot?
- Sanity covers Content API, Collaborative editing, Structured content, Webhooks. Swan covers Embedded business accounts, Card issuing, SEPA payments, Local account localisation.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Sanity: What does the Sanity Free plan include?
The Free plan includes up to 20 seats, 2 public datasets, 10,000 documents, 1 million API CDN requests per month, and 2 permission roles.
SourceSwan: Which countries does Swan offer local accounts in?
France, Germany and Spain specifically, alongside broader SEPA payment coverage.
Sanity: How much does Sanity Growth plan cost per user?
The Growth plan costs $15 per seat per month, with up to 50 seats, and includes 25,000 documents, 1 million API CDN requests, and 5 permission roles.
SourceSwan: Is pricing published?
No, Swan describes a usage-based, no-large-setup-fee philosophy but requires a quote for actual numbers.
Sanity: What is included in Sanity Enterprise pricing?
Enterprise pricing is custom and requires contacting sales. It includes custom seat limits, custom datasets, Single Sign-On, and dedicated support.
SourceSwan: Who regulates Swan?
France's ACPR (Autorite de Controle Prudentiel et de Resolution), as a licensed e-money institution.
Sanity: Does Sanity offer annual billing discounts?
Annual and invoice payment options are available exclusively for Enterprise customers. Self-serve plans (Free and Growth) use monthly billing only.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Sanity vs Payload CMS
- Sanity vs KeystoneJS
- Sanity vs Strapi
- Sanity vs GraphQL Apollo
- Sanity vs Prisma
- Sanity vs Sensedia
- Sanity vs Hasura
- Sanity vs PocketBase
- Sanity vs Directus
- Sanity vs Paw
- Sanity vs Tyk
- Sanity vs Janus Gateway
- Sanity vs Kong Gateway
- Sanity vs Marqeta
- Sanity vs Meniga
- Sanity vs Moov
- Sanity vs MX Technologies
- Sanity vs PubNub
- Sanity vs Vodeno
- Sanity vs Trustly
- Sanity vs Yapily
- Sanity vs Unit
- Sanity vs Griffin
- Sanity vs Weavr
- Sanity vs Fintech Farm
- Sanity vs Lithic
- Sanity vs Solaris
- Sanity vs Treasury Prime
- Sanity vs Synctera
- Sanity vs Astra
- Sanity vs Treblle
- Sanity vs Tribe Payments
- Sanity vs Tuum
- Swan vs Payload CMS
- Swan vs KeystoneJS
- Swan vs Strapi
- Swan vs GraphQL Apollo
- Swan vs Prisma
- Swan vs Sensedia
- Swan vs Hasura
- Swan vs PocketBase
- Swan vs Directus
- Swan vs Paw
- Swan vs Tyk
- Swan vs Janus Gateway
- Swan vs Kong Gateway
- Swan vs Marqeta
- Swan vs Meniga
- Swan vs Moov
- Swan vs MX Technologies
- Swan vs PubNub
- Swan vs Vodeno
- Swan vs Trustly
- Swan vs Yapily
- Swan vs Unit
- Swan vs Griffin
- Swan vs Weavr
- Swan vs Fintech Farm
- Swan vs Lithic
- Swan vs Solaris
- Swan vs Treasury Prime
- Swan vs Synctera
- Swan vs Astra
- Swan vs Treblle
- Swan vs Tribe Payments
- Swan vs Tuum
